+1
Regards,
Adrian
Jonas Lim wrote:
+1
Regards,
Jonas
- Original Message - From: Hiram Chirino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 1:26 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.0.2
Since it was brought up, and folks concurred
+1
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/26/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it was brought up, and folks concurred that it's about time to put
out
a bug fix release for ActiveMQ, I've put together a binary release of
ActiveMQ 4.0.2:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-847?page=comments#action_36647 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-847:
I think 1) is a duplicate of AMQ-835 maybe?
Memory Leaks
Key: AMQ-847
On 7/20/06, Lalit Nagpal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Q1. Can anybody please tell me key differences between Stomp and Openwire.
Which one i should go for if i need to write a C++ Layer to talk to
ActiveMQ. Drawbacks and Advantages can help me a lot.
This was already answered in another thread
Incidentally I've struggled a bit with the release plugin in the past;
have found it a little temperamental. (I ended up not using it when I
released xbean as I just couldn't get it to work after following the
instructions to the letter). The bits I like though are all that
switching of poms,
+1
On 26 Jul 2006, at 06:26, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Since it was brought up, and folks concurred that it's about time
to put out
a bug fix release for ActiveMQ, I've put together a binary release of
ActiveMQ 4.0.2:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC1/
The ActiveMQ Core Build on GBuild's Continuum (http://ci.gbuild.org/
continuum/target/) has been failing since July 7th. See http://
ci.gbuild.org/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm?
view=ProjectBuildbuildId=5212id=4 for the specific failures.
Are these tests failing for
I've been trying to build from source (from trunk) for a couple of days,
and every day I run into the same issue with the servicemix-common
artifact on the mvn2 repos:
[INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.
Missing:
--
1)
I like the idea of being able to have more read-able endpoint elements in
the xbean XML :)
P
On 7/26/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's they way to do it.
But HttpEndpoint delegates to ConsumerProcessor / ProviderProcessor, so
you
also need
to write another processor for your
I agree that we probably want to break the layout / distribution and
documentation up, and I like the idea of a Spring-like User Guide.
If everyone is ok with it I'd like to start a page on the wiki regarding
possible new SVN structure, a page on builds. As for the user guide I've
found the
I agree that we need to push more examples away from the lw-container
approach, I have been thinking that we could do this by continuing to
extend the archetypes.
P
On 7/26/06, Terry Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would recommend more worked examples in the documentation and
strictly, the
+1 for going away from lw-container when possible.
I think both archetypes and ready to run examples are necessary.
On 7/27/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that we need to push more examples away from the lw-container
approach, I have been thinking that we could do this by
Let's move on !
On 7/27/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that we probably want to break the layout / distribution and
documentation up, and I like the idea of a Spring-like User Guide.
If everyone is ok with it I'd like to start a page on the wiki regarding
possible new SVN
*ProviderProcessor in servicemix-jms overwrites the MimeMessage content-type
with the one from the incoming normalizedmessage
-
Key: SM-502
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-406?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-406.
Fix Version/s: 3.0-M3
(was: 3.0-M2)
Resolution: Fixed
Author: gnodet
Date: Thu Jul 27 09:22:11 2006
New Revision: 426121
URL:
Cool, thx.
I'm ready to help in any way I can, so if you have any question on the
component or
JBI in general, feel free to ask :)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
ant elder wrote:
Bringing this into Tuscany sounds really good to me and I'd like to
help you
do it. I'll go have a look at whats needed
Hi, Matt!
I am rather new to Geronimo, so please be patient if my questions
sound rather stupid.
2006/7/27, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The second method is to use an optimistic strategy where a mono incrementing
column or timestamp is
used to disambiguate tuples from each other. The
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2067?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha reopened GERONIMO-2067:
--
Configs migration to M2
---
Key: GERONIMO-2067
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2067?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2067:
-
Attachment: m2-plugins.patch
hot-deployer.patch
1. The latest m2-plugins.patch is made against m2migration branch rev
Jason,
I have attached the patches for the car-maven-plugin here for my
convenience just in case I need to refer to something.
Thanks
Anita
--- Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2067?page=all ]
Anita
Thanks!
I will look at it tomorrow... I should have been in bed like 3 hours
ago (but still up setting up my new macbookpro).
--jason
On Jul 27, 2006, at 3:47 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Jason,
I have attached the patches for the car-maven-plugin here for my
convenience just in case
Looks like your base LICENSE and NOTICE files contain only AL 2.0
license information. Since you're releasing code under multiple
licenses, according to http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html, all
license/notice information needs to be placed there.
--kevan
On Jul 26, 2006, at 1:26 AM,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-9?page=all ]
Slava updated DAYTRADER-9:
--
Attachment: DAYTRADER-9_updated.patch
Matt,
Thanks for catching the duplicate data. I must have done the mistake
tranfering the changes from my working environment to
Hi Matt...
On 7/27/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted to let people know about one of the fixes I'm putting into 1.1.1.I addressed this issuein a note previously and it has to do with our locking model for CMP persistence.This note is
applicable to OpenEJB-2.1.1-SNAPSHOT as well
Aaron,
I think we can do the wiki page at some point to look at the complete
design of the portlet but not right now. Right now I'm more concerned
with fixing some of the problems with what we have before 1.1.1 goes out
the door. I'll work on the problems that I listed and see if I can also
Thanks Mohammed...that's what I ws looking for. cheers.
Mohammed Nour wrote:
Hi Matt...
On 7/27/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted to let people know about one of the fixes I'm putting into
1.1.1. I
addressed this issue
in a note previously and it has to do with our
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-9?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed DAYTRADER-9.
-
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Matt Hogstrom
Thanks Slava...patches applied and tested. Cheers.
Sending
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2190?page=all ]
Timothy Sutton updated GERONIMO-2190:
-
I actually resolved what was wrong with this issue. It was my fault why this
was not working. I was setting the system property
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Hi, Matt!
I am rather new to Geronimo, so please be patient if my questions
sound rather stupid.
2006/7/27, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The second method is to use an optimistic strategy where a mono
incrementing column or timestamp is
used to disambiguate
Hi,
I am also finding problems on deploying a webservice packaged
in a war file. I am getting errors during deserialisation. To fix
these errors I have modified the plans for
tomcat-deployer and openejb-deployer gbeans. I have modified their
defaultEnvironment to contain following
Sounds good.
Does virtual topics will fit ServiceMix requirement for WS-Notification
clustering ?
Currently, one problem is that if you deploy the same WS-Notification
consumer on several nodes, they will not act as a single consumer with load
balancing between the consumers. It seems to be the
Can I use a servicemix component (for example XsltComponent) directly like a
web service (how?) or I must create a web service between the client and
servicemix?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/servicemix---web-service-tf2009607.html#a5521126
Sent from the ServiceMix -
+1 for going away from lw-container when possible.
I think both archetypes and ready to run examples are necessary.
Agreed. You need to understand the patterns before you can choose an
archetype to apply.
Terry
Hi Kevan,
This must be new. We were distributing multiple license files. Now that we
need to put it all in 1 license file, do you know how we should handle the
case were the original license was in html format? Should we reformat it to
be in plain text? Or should we just paste in the html
When you say ' web service', i guess you mean http+soap, right ?
You just need to create a wsdl that would describe the transformation and
deploy it to the servicemix-http component.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/27/06, emicalc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I use a servicemix component (for
Deployment fails with InvalidConfigException: Unable to deserialize GBeanState
when Sun JMX RI JAR is on classpath in EAR
-
Key: GERONIMO-2233
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-453?page=comments#action_36648 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on AMQ-453:
-
See also http://www.nabble.com/Virtual-Destination-changes-tf2009484.html
Clustering subscriptions
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2204?page=all ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2204:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.1.1
1.2
Assignee: David Jencks (was: Dain Sundstrom)
Fixed in 1.1.1, needs search for other places this
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2142?page=all ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2142:
---
Attachment: ejbref-itests.jar
Sample applications to demonstrate that ejb-refs between a war and an ejb-jar
work. See README for instructions.
EJB
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2120?page=comments#action_12423850
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2120:
Main part of fix is in openejb ref 2823.
Can't have ejb references outside current config.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2120?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2120.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This part is not a problem in trunk since Dain removed passing around the
ProxyInfo object.
Can't have ejb references outside
Does anybody know where I can find the source code for the geronimo
samples, jsp-examples and tomcat-examples ?
We are using these in our builds from this repository
http://people.apache.org/repo/m1-snapshot-repository/geronimo-samples/wars/
We should archive the classes dirs in these wars just
As part of work on GERONIMO-2148 fixing ejb-refs between modules I
extended (or made work) some non-j2ee functionality and I wonder if
we want it. I think we do. Lets see if I can describe the
functionality:
ejb-link in a j2ee app is only supposed to work between modules in an
ear.
I think extended functionality is good. As long as it doesn't violate
or break our spec compliance, why not allow it to do more? I am in
support of extended functionality.
Jeff
David Jencks wrote:
As part of work on GERONIMO-2148 fixing ejb-refs between modules I
extended (or made work) some
I think it is a benefit to a user. They might be surprised when it doesn't work in another
Appserver. So long as we don't break compliance I think we should keep it.
David Jencks wrote:
As part of work on GERONIMO-2148 fixing ejb-refs between modules I
extended (or made work) some non-j2ee
Hi,
I have a question regarding receive/acknowledge model in AMQ.
If there are 2 consumers (running on separate machines) connected to AMQ
server on the same queue. Consumer-1 receives a message and don't send
acknowledge. Is consumer-2 will be able to receive this messages ever
without
Hi,
I have a question regarding receive/acknowledge model in AMQ.
If there are 2 consumers (running on separate machines) connected to AMQ
server on the same queue. Consumer-1 receives a message and don't send
acknowledge. Is consumer-2 will be able to receive this messages ever
without
On 7/27/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding receive/acknowledge model in AMQ.
If there are 2 consumers (running on separate machines) connected to AMQ
server on the same queue. Consumer-1 receives a message and don't send
acknowledge. Is
I just responded to the other empty thread - thought I'd resend my reply...
On 7/27/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding receive/acknowledge model in AMQ.
If there are 2 consumers (running on separate machines) connected to AMQ
server on the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2227?page=comments#action_12423859
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2227:
Maybe I'm missing something, but you patch appears to assign null to an already
null variable. It also
BTW I've just updated the documentation to show how to customize the
virtual topic behaviour via XML
http://activemq.org/site/virtual-destinations.html
There is also an example of a Composite Queue where sending a message
to a queue/topic can really result in the message being forwarded to a
I believe we used the source from Tomcat verbatim as we did not want to
fork the code. In fact IIRC, it was a rename of the jars.
Jeff
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Does anybody know where I can find the source code for the geronimo
samples, jsp-examples and tomcat-examples ?
We are using these in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2229?page=comments#action_12423860
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2229:
The previous thinking on this is that we are required for j2ee compliance to
ship the uddi application but it
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2227?page=comments#action_12423861
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2227:
Unfortunately, I don't have an example. This change was left on my tree and
I've forgotten specifically what
Hey James,
Thanks for the response, it make sense.
Sorry about the empty thread, subject line was dropped in the first one
so I thought I should add it and sent it again for better readability.
I have noticed another thing though.
If I have few messages in a queue (lets say 10) and bring
On 7/27/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey James,
Thanks for the response, it make sense.
Sorry about the empty thread, subject line was dropped in the first one
so I thought I should add it and sent it again for better readability.
I have noticed another thing though.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-828?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-828.
Resolution: Fixed
For documentation and an example of how to use this feature see...
http://activemq.org/site/configure-startup-destinations.html
add some
This has been requested quite a few times in the past - the ability to
configure in the broker what destinations are available on startup.
I've finally added an implementation and test case to SVN HEAD to fix
AMQ-828.
The documention and an example is here...
Paul,
I haven't heard back about whether you want me to post the same
plugins that are on your site, so I'll assume yes unless I hear
otherwise. I see you updated the paths on your server though, which
is great.
A few more notes about the liferay plugins:
It looks like you have a plugin for
There has been a lot of progress on 1.1.1. We started with 61 issues and we're
down to 21 left.
Originally I suggested that we branch on Friday. I'd like to give a little more time and would like
to revise the branch to a freeze state on Tuesday, August 1 at 0500 PT. At that time I'll spin
On 7/27/06, Jerome Camilleri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
Thanks for the heads up! Do you have a link to the project?
No link because for the moment it's an internal project but we would
like to publish it.
Ah OK :)
Is your intention to create an open source project out
Hi,
I have a question. We have XML libraries in repository/xercers folder and lib/endorsed folder of the server. And also, the manifest file in server.jar refers to the ones in lib/endorsed.
Why do we have these JARs at two places?
Thanks
Phani
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-469?page=all ]
Michael Studman closed SM-469.
--
Fix Version/s: 3.0-M2
Resolution: Fixed
On retesting this in M2, I find I can no longer reproduce it.
XMLStreamHelper / servicemix-jms won't transport
User can lock the default keystore without warning, making jetty server unusable
Key: GERONIMO-2234
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2234
Project:
Locking default keystore results in serialization error on tomcat
-
Key: GERONIMO-2235
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2235
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
At revision 426188. Clean local repo
Test in activation module fails. Anybody know what suddenly changed there ?
-
Test set: org.apache.geronimo.activation.handlers.MailcapTest
If i need to route message based on if an error occurs or not what do I do?
Example
I pass a message m0 to component c1, then pass message from component c1 to
c2, if c2 returns an error I want to pass the contents in m0 to component
c3.
How can I do this, is there some EIP pattern to do this
keystore portlet - providing a null or incorrect password on edit unlock cannot
be recovered
Key: GERONIMO-2236
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2236
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2236?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-2236:
---
Summary: keystore portlet - providing a null or incorrect
password on edit unlock can only be recovered with server recycle (was:
keystore portlet
On 7/27/06, Brian Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Aaron,
We've only tested in Tomcat so far. Our next step is to get a bundle out for
jetty as well.
OK. If you're planning to release a Jetty bundle, that suggests that
we should name the current plugin liferay-portal-tomcat so it'll
leave
Filtering of springframework.org in TomcatDeployer plan creates CNF Exceptions
in Ears
--
Key: GERONIMO-2237
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2237
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2237?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-2237:
---
Affects Version/s: 1.1
(was: 1.1.1)
Filtering of springframework.org in TomcatDeployer plan creates CNF
Exceptions in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2237?page=comments#action_12423902
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2237:
-
We don't have Spring in the server any more so removing the filters should be a
non-event. It won't affect
I know I've put some changes in 1.1 that ought to go into trunk. Is
there a way for me to generate a list of commits I've made (with
version number and comment) in one or both branches over the last
month or so? Otherwise, I guess I'll consult the mailing list
archives.
Thanks,
Aaron
Aaron, I don't know of a tool to do it for you but I do know that you could run svn log --xml -v path_to_repo_branch and parse the output for your userid. I am actually in the process of building a tool for Subversion reporting like what you are looking for but it isn't available yet. I'll keep
IIRC, there were a few minor tweaks of the examples.. See GERONIMO-1299
and GERONIMO-1540 for details..
-Dave-
Jeff Genender wrote:
I believe we used the source from Tomcat verbatim as we did not want to
fork the code. In fact IIRC, it was a rename of the jars.
Jeff
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2182?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-2182.
Fix Version/s: 1.1.1
(was: 1.1.x)
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Aaron Mulder
Committed changes and updated the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2219?page=comments#action_12423904
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-2219:
---
Build, tested and am confident they can go to the trunk. Here goes my +1 for
the work that's been done
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2237?page=comments#action_12423911
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2237:
-
Best of all would be to get Spring out of the parent hierarchy of web apps so
this problem just went away.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2219?page=comments#action_12423914
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2219:
-
+1...go for it.
[RTC] Merge m2migration (functional m2 build) to trunk
2 down... 1 to go. Any PMC member want to be the lucky third?
--jason
On Jul 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Jacek Laskowski (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2219?
page=comments#action_12423904 ]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-2219:
You have them. Matt's comment looks like a +1 and you have Jacek and mine.
Jeff
Jason Dillon wrote:
2 down... 1 to go. Any PMC member want to be the lucky third?
--jason
On Jul 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Jacek Laskowski (JIRA) wrote:
[
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2219?page=comments#action_12423921
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2219:
-
Ok,
That's 3 +1's from PMC membersgo do your vodoo.
[RTC] Merge m2migration (functional m2 build) to
On 7/27/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 down... 1 to go. Any PMC member want to be the lucky third?
After Jeff's you've got three. It's your turn then. Will watch all
your steps...mind them! ;-)
Jason must be one of the happiest men in the world, mustn't he?
Jacek
--
Jacek
We still need some votes on GERONIMO-2223. This is the RTC that
moves genesis out of the sandbox. GERONIMO-2219 is built using
genesis and so you guys already kinda reviewed/tested it. But the
RTC issue is separate because it is logically different than the merge,
Please review and vote
Well, I certainly was not expecting this kinda of speedy response ;-)
Still need you guys to bless this:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2223
--jason
On Jul 27, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/27/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 down... 1 to go.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2223?page=comments#action_12423925
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2223:
-
+1. tested with the m2 build.
[RTC] Move genesis out of the sandbox
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2234?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-2234:
--
Assignee: Joe Bohn
User can lock the default keystore without warning, making jetty server
unusable
We soon need to make a large set of source file header changes do to recent
policy changes.. see:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html.
Hopefully I'll get some time in the next few days and I'll tackle this.
Please let me know if you got some big changes pending commit and want me to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2234?page=all ]
Joe Bohn resolved GERONIMO-2234.
Resolution: Fixed
Added a challenge for now. Would still like to followup with some logic to
require the password to lock since the results are so
One more and we are set.
Any takers?
--jason
On Jul 27, 2006, at 2:10 PM, Jacek Laskowski (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2223?
page=comments#action_12423926 ]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-2223:
---
Built,
Altered the subject, hopefully won't go unnoticed this time :-)
John
John Sisson wrote:
Reposting.. probably got lost in all the email traffic.
John
John Sisson wrote:
Aaron,
What JIRA is associated with this change?
Thanks,
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ammulder
Date: Tue Jul 25
On 7/27/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul,
I haven't heard back about whether you want me to post the same
plugins that are on your site, so I'll assume yes unless I hear
otherwise. I see you updated the paths on your server though, which
is great.
Aaron, I'm at a conference
On Jul 27, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Jason must be one of the happiest men in the world, mustn't he?
Um... I can think of several reasons that I might be happier :-P
* * *
I will merge this back when I finish setting up my new Mac Book Pro :-)
--jason
I have no idea, but it causes an exception; it's definitely a bug.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 7/27/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Altered the subject, hopefully won't go unnoticed this time :-)
John
John Sisson wrote:
Reposting.. probably got lost in all the email traffic.
John
John
On 7/27/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this would simplify configuration for users. Could we log a
warning (that can be enabled/disabled) at deploy time identifying
extended features are being utilised? Putting myself in users shoes, I
would like to use these extensions, but
Is there any desire to continue moving in this direction?
I personally believe that by having the site in Confluence that it
will be much easier for us to keep the content up to date, as well as
easily be able to add new content.
IMO this is the direction that the Geronimo site should
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-?page=all ]
John Sisson closed GERONIMO-.
-
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Application errors in static initialization blocks during serialization of
configuration during deployment
On 7/28/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any desire to continue moving in this direction?
I personally believe that by having the site in Confluence that it
will be much easier for us to keep the content up to date, as well as
easily be able to add new content.
IMO this is
I think it would be worthwhile continuing to work on this but I think we
need to sort out some of the issues mentioned below before we switch
over so any committer can update the site without requiring assistance
from Infra or yourself. I also agree with Matt's comment about it being
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
