[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-94?page=all ]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-94:
Attachment: devtools94.patch
Patch has been tested on importing war projects.
JAR project still doesn't want, but that is not because the
Okay... replying to myself.
How about... since no one has had anything to say.
I suggest we drop the m1 build at the end of next week, friday the 25th.
And unless I hear any objections I am going to follow through... so
please speak up if you want to keep the old rusting clunker around for
On 8/17/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
4.1, which is the first release that is using m2 and has m2
artifacts. I think we should switch over trunk to
On 8/17/06, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/17/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
4.1, which is the first release that is using m2 and has
On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 8/17/06, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/17/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
4.1,
On 8/9/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far there have been no negative reponses, and several PMC +1s
Can we start an official vote and then plan for the removal of m1?
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
+1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I propose we remove the
On Aug 17, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
I caution against removing the m1 until the m2 build has been stable
for a period of time. We made this mistake with ActiveMQ and
ServiceMix and wound up having to restore the m1 build while gremlins
were flushed from the m2 build.
Hrm... its
Not sure if there is such thing as TranQL mailing list, so I figured,
I'll ask here.
Are there any plans to extend TranQL with EJB3 QL support?
Thanks
Andrus
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428896
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2307:
Um, so how would we go about making our own versions?
Open up a text editor with theirs, open up a new file
Does pristine mean that all those ugly runtime exceptions, gbean start
errors, illegal state errors, assertion errors, and NoClassDefFound
errors mentioned in the Maven2 ... we are almost there thread will be
resolved? If so, and we must first remove the m1 build to get these
addressed,
I'm all for getting rid of those test related errors that are not
errors (or maybe are errors and they test is broken and does not
fail)... but I think they are independent.
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Does pristine mean that all those ugly runtime exceptions,
For EJB 3 persistence we're looking to leverage other projects like OpenJPA and
/ or Cayenne.
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Not sure if there is such thing as TranQL mailing list, so I figured,
I'll ask here.
Are there any plans to extend TranQL with EJB3 QL support?
Thanks
Andrus
Andrus is Cayenne ;-)
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
For EJB 3 persistence we're looking to leverage other projects like
OpenJPA and / or Cayenne.
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Not sure if there is such thing as TranQL mailing list, so I figured,
I'll ask here.
Are there any plans to extend TranQL with
I dunno what is up the with TranQL ML either... need to get some more
m2 related changes into that project and not sure where to ask.
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 9:29 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Andrus is Cayenne ;-)
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
For EJB 3 persistence we're looking to leverage other
Yeah :-) so I was checking if there is a parser in the works. Ok,
we'll work on it.
Andrus
On Aug 18, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Andrus is Cayenne ;-)
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
For EJB 3 persistence we're looking to leverage other projects like
OpenJPA and / or Cayenne.
Andrus
Heh, I should have checked the incoming Andrus...my bad...
Jason, on the M2 stuff for Tranql you can kick me or Gianny.
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Yeah :-) so I was checking if there is a parser in the works. Ok, we'll
work on it.
Andrus
On Aug 18, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428897
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2307:
-
My understanding is that you crack open the Spec and type in the elements that
need to be specific and
Okay... *kick*
Can you release tranql using m2, into an m2 repo... that is one of
the G deps that currently must be pulled from an m1 repo, which does
not give us valid v4 poms. I posted patches to djencks for the m2
build a while ago, but they were never published.
Probably needs a bit
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428898
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2307:
How is that different than just stripping out the comments and other docs from
the existing schemas?
What happened to a vote?
Regards,
Alan
Jason Dillon wrote:
Okay... replying to myself.
How about... since no one has had anything to say.
I suggest we drop the m1 build at the end of next week, friday the 25th.
And unless I hear any objections I am going to follow through... so
please
I asked a few times about a formal vote... that all went unanswered. Informally though the response was positive, as I noted in a previous email:snip +1: dain, jason (me), paul, sachin, david jencks, david blevins,prasad, anita, gianny, alan, matt"in favor": aaron"all for dropping, w/ tck
FYI, I have no objections to a formal vote... just I'm not sure how
the voting rules play with our current situation, and was hoping
someone from the PMC would have started the vote.
You want to start one now that you have been recently blessed?
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 9:55 PM, Alan
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428914
]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-2307:
---
Where does it say that they are under the Berkley license? We should document
the source of this information
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2307:
Description:
Geronimo redistributes the Sun J2EE schema files for deployment descriptors etc
but doesn't appear to include anything in the global
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
