Ya, I see this from time to time... not really sure why it pops up sometimes and not at others. Its easy enough to fix... but I think that its much easier with ng.Still talking to maven folks about getting a release of surefire that works with testng + jdk14, but the
2.8-SNAPSHOT works for now...
So you got around this? This was not happening for me so I'm not sure
what is going on, it appears from the next message that you got it to
work.
I did see an UndeclaredThrowableException a time or two but it was
always because the selenium server was not running.
I'm going to dig into yo
Okay, I was able to get something working... though I had to use
classes from geronimo-kernel... not sure how to perform the same
operations with just JMX interfaces.
If anyone knows, please speak up... it would be nice to not need to
use kernel classes to check a few boolean attributes on
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Are plugins specific to Geronimo and Geronimo alone?
> If so, then a sub-project might be a nice idea.
>
Yes...the plugins are specific to Geronimo.
> If not, however, then there is little compelling need
> to make G even more "bloated" with efforts than it is,
> and mak
On 9/3/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The following sentence made me want to make sure we didn't
wander into strange roads and get lost:
"Remember that the Geronimo kernel has no knowledge of J2EE."
This statement has no bearing on the outcome of the project - Geronimo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On 9/2/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Bruce Snyder wrote:
>>> For me, Jeff just hit the nail on the head. Remember that the Geronimo
>>> kernel has n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On 9/2/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Bruce Snyder wrote:
>>> For me, Jeff just hit the nail on the head. Remember that the Geronimo
>>> kernel has n
Are plugins specific to Geronimo and Geronimo alone?
If so, then a sub-project might be a nice idea.
If not, however, then there is little compelling need
to make G even more "bloated" with efforts than it is,
and making it a self-contained project would be best.
Okay, I will try that after I get some sleep.
Its just a bit confusing since I don't see any attribute on any mbean
that looks anything like kernelFullyStarted from jconsole.
Thanks :-)
--jason
On Sep 3, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I think if you get the AbstractName for the Lo
I think if you get the AbstractName for the LocalAttributeManager in a
test program, there's a method on the AbstractName to get or generate
an ObjectName, and then you could use that ObjectName to access the
LocalAttributeManager (and therefore the kernelFullyStarted attribute)
via JMX. I'm not
I found some bits in Daemon that I can use... though it iterates over
all of the configs from a query... is there on bean that can be used
to query the state?
--jason
On Sep 3, 2006, at 5:34 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I think kernelFullyStarted is a GBean attribute on only certain types
of G
Any idea how to actually do that?
--jason
On Sep 3, 2006, at 5:34 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I think kernelFullyStarted is a GBean attribute on only certain types
of GBeans -- I believe PersistentConfigurationList GBeans. It's set
by Daemon.java when the startup process is complete, so it's not
On 9/2/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why would you not want to take the lead on this? You helped push the
idea, you have a majority of the knowledge and your mentoring would
eventually provide your goal..."more plugin authors and more plugins
developed" [paraphrase]. You have a s
I think kernelFullyStarted is a GBean attribute on only certain types
of GBeans -- I believe PersistentConfigurationList GBeans. It's set
by Daemon.java when the startup process is complete, so it's not a
kernel-level feature, but should still work for all practical
purposes. I would think you'd
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2374?page=all ]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-2374.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Okay, this is in... now we have two modules, one with my testng proto and one
with your decorator proto. Ta
And... FYI, as I thought, the decorator setup is per-class... I added
a TestLogin2Test that is just a plain copy to see what it would do.
Anyways, looks like basic (testng) and basic-junit work, so I'm gonna
commit your patch and we can discus further which is the best option.
--jason
On
FYI, I applied your patch... and surefire barfs as I thought it might:
java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException
at $Proxy0.addError(Unknown Source)
at junit.framework.TestResult.addError(TestResult.java:36)
at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:
I think I'm going to make 2 test groups for now... one to test testng
and one to test the junit decorator bits... then we can see which
works better.
I've been playing with console-testsuite today using testng and it
works well... nice to have tags to specify what methods to run before
th
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2299?page=all ]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-2299.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
I've added default assembly configuration for use with {{mvn geronimo:start}}
(and {{mvn geronimo:stop}}).
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2299?page=comments#action_12432325
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2299:
Can probably use {{mvn geronimo:start}} for this... need to add a profile to
the root pom with jetty and tomca
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2348?page=comments#action_12432324
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2348:
---
Created a bug report in bugzilla. Bug #40401.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
21 matches
Mail list logo
