Re: Trunk runtime error GBeanInstanceState- deserializing GBeanState

2006-12-19 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Anita, Try this when you have some time. 1. Remove your .m2 2. "mvn install" from root. 3. cd to testsuite and run "mvn -N install" 4. cd to itests and run "mvn -N install" 5. cd to cxfPojoWS and run "mvn -o install" It's impossible to execute 5 with "-o" flag as the project needs to download c

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M1 Release

2006-12-19 Thread Rick McGuire
+1 Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was done by the lot of y'all :) I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm satisfied with the results. All modes of operation functioned well (SLSB, Direct, EJB and JPA). I toned

Start a 4.1.1 release ?

2006-12-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I'd like to release jencks 2.0 and servicemix 3.1, but I'm a little reluctant to do so because both make heavy use of the ActiveMQ resource adapter, which is unfortunately quite unreliable in 4.1.0, mainly because of the following bug http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1078. Could we re

Re: Start a 4.1.1 release ?

2006-12-19 Thread Rob Davies
sounds a good idea! +1 On 19 Dec 2006, at 09:42, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I'd like to release jencks 2.0 and servicemix 3.1, but I'm a little reluctant to do so because both make heavy use of the ActiveMQ resource adapter, which is unfortunately quite unreliable in 4.1.0, mainly because of th

[jira] Created: (AMQ-1103) Prefetch size < 0 should throw an exception somewhere or be defaulted, as messages are not dispatched anymore

2006-12-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
Prefetch size < 0 should throw an exception somewhere or be defaulted, as messages are not dispatched anymore - Key: AMQ-1103 URL: https://issues.apache.or

[jira] Created: (AMQ-1104) The resource adapter should pool sessions

2006-12-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
The resource adapter should pool sessions - Key: AMQ-1104 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1104 Project: ActiveMQ Issue Type: Improvement Components: Connector R

[jira] Created: (AMQ-1105) Misuse of maxMessages on the ActivationSpec

2006-12-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
Misuse of maxMessages on the ActivationSpec --- Key: AMQ-1105 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1105 Project: ActiveMQ Issue Type: Improvement Components: Connector

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-1105) Misuse of maxMessages when creating a connection consumer

2006-12-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1105?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet updated AMQ-1105: - Summary: Misuse of maxMessages when creating a connection consumer (was: Misuse of maxMessages on the ActivationSpec) > Misuse of maxMessages when creati

[jira] Created: (SM-784) No support for xml message encodings such as ISO-8859-1

2006-12-19 Thread Anders Hammar (JIRA)
No support for xml message encodings such as ISO-8859-1 --- Key: SM-784 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-784 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Bug Components: servi

[jira] Updated: (SM-782) Re-deploy with In-Only Mep

2006-12-19 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-782?page=all ] Grégoire A. updated SM-782: --- Attachment: MultiplexingConsumerProcessor.java.diff It is my first patch for SMX. tell me how to improve it. I would be interessed to become a committer, do you need

[jira] Resolved: (SM-755) The EIP pipeline should have another exchange target for faults

2006-12-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-755?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-755. Fix Version/s: 3.1 Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Guillaume Nodet Author: gnodet Date: Tue Dec 19 03:10:02 2006 New Revision: 488633 URL: http://

Re: Start a 4.1.1 release ?

2006-12-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I guess we can wait a bit to upgrade to the upcoming xbean 2.8 which fixes the xml schema generation -- they can not be used :( atm On 12/19/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to release jencks 2.0 and servicemix 3.1, but I'm a little reluctant to do so because both make he

[jira] Commented: (SM-782) Re-deploy with In-Only Mep

2006-12-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-782?page=comments#action_37726 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-782: If you could just keep the indentation to 4 spaces, the patch will be perfect :) To become a committer, keep sending patches

Re: Error when deploying day trader - 2.0-M1-SNAPSHOT

2006-12-19 Thread Christopher Blythe
Ran into the same thing... for both Geronimo 1.2 and 2.0 you need to add the following to the dependency list in the daytrader deployment plans. org.apache.geronimo.configs j2ee-corba-yoko car On 12/18/06, Krishnakumar B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2.0-M1-SNAPSH

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M1 Release

2006-12-19 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
+1 --vamsi On 12/18/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All, I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was done by the lot of y'all :) I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm satisfied with the results. All modes of operation functioned we

Re: svn commit: r488326 - /geronimo/server/tags/2.0-M1/testsuite/deployment-testsuite/manifestcp/manifestcp-ejb/src/main/resources/META-INF/ejb-jar.xml

2006-12-19 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
I agree with Jason. We should not be changing code once tagged. --vamsi On 12/19/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ugh... this is why I don't like all that moving of branches to tags... A "tag" or "label" should never be modified... its a point in time, not indented (or expected)

Re: svn commit: r487651 - /geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml

2006-12-19 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
On 12/16/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Dec 15, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: > Yikes... what happened on this change? > > The diff shows a lot more changed than just what was indicated in > the comment... > Ya, looks like a formatting change. A diff before would hel

Re: Trunk runtime error GBeanInstanceState- deserializing GBeanState

2006-12-19 Thread anita kulshreshtha
Dims, Yes, it is not straightforward to do an offline build.. This is what many of us do: 1. If starting from an empty repo do a full online build. Delete modules, configs and assemblies directory from .m2 repo. Do an offline build of these items (sometimes car plugin). 2. After an svn update, b

Re: Trunk runtime error GBeanInstanceState- deserializing GBeanState

2006-12-19 Thread Donald Woods
This is a very sad state of affairs, as we are spending more time getting this convoluted maven build to work than writing code, just as many have pointed out and I'm sure will cause jdillon and anyone doing CTS testing ulcers. Is it not time to split the Geronimo 2.0 build into separate mave

Re: Trunk runtime error GBeanInstanceState- deserializing GBeanState

2006-12-19 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Anecdotal evidence: i spent 4 days to get the builds working and took me 2 hours to fix the code problems related to the cxfPojoWS. thanks, -- dims On 12/19/06, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is a very sad state of affairs, as we are spending more time getting this convoluted mave

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2577) Geronimo cluster (Tomcat Version)cannot continue the HttpSession when current node is down.

2006-12-19 Thread Dave Colasurdo (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2577?page=comments#action_12459700 ] Dave Colasurdo commented on GERONIMO-2577: -- 1) Is node c (the failing node) always the same physical machine? 2) Are you 100% certain that all three n

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2671) Streaming API for XML and JAXB integration

2006-12-19 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2671?page=all ] Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-2671: -- Attachment: stax-jaxb.patch It looks like the initial patch created classloader problems for the cxf module. This patch resolves those issues by creatin

Re: Performance Issue

2006-12-19 Thread garima015
Changing the delivery mode to NONpersisitent and creating the session using Session.DUPS_OK_ACKNOWLEDGE is effectively increasing the performance..now it is processing 1000 transactions in less than 2 sec James.Strachan wrote: > > On 12/19/06, garima015 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Thanks fo

Re: svn commit: r487651 - /geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml

2006-12-19 Thread Jason Dillon
I actually use the diff to help me remember what I changed... so its part of my routine. TextMate is awesome too, you can `svn diff | mate` and it will open up an editor in diff mode with colors... so nice :-) --jason On Dec 19, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: On 12/16/0

Java EE 5.0 Report Card updated

2006-12-19 Thread Dave Colasurdo
The Java EE 5.0 Report card has been updated on the project wiki. This update incorporates all the recent 2.0-M1 activity and other recent developments relating to Java EE 5.0. Please take a second to review it for accuracy. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+Java+E

[jira] Commented: (SM-782) Re-deploy with In-Only Mep

2006-12-19 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-782?page=comments#action_37731 ] Grégoire A. commented on SM-782: i can improve my modification by remove the message's context before the return action. two rem: - if we need a mapping between a

Re: svn commit: r487651 - /geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml

2006-12-19 Thread David Blevins
On Dec 19, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: On 12/16/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Dec 15, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: > Yikes... what happened on this change? > > The diff shows a lot more changed than just what was indicated in > the comment... > Ya

[jira] Commented: (SM-782) Re-deploy with In-Only Mep

2006-12-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-782?page=comments#action_37732 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-782: We can not put the context directly in the message exchange, because all properties put inside the exchange / message must b

[jira] Created: (SM-788) start/stop/restart on SM

2006-12-19 Thread Eyji (JIRA)
start/stop/restart on SM Key: SM-788 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-788 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: New Feature Affects Versions: 3.0.1 Environment: Unix/Win32 Reporter

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2577) Geronimo cluster (Tomcat Version)cannot continue the HttpSession when current node is down.

2006-12-19 Thread Dave Colasurdo (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2577?page=comments#action_12459757 ] Dave Colasurdo commented on GERONIMO-2577: -- I have seen clustering fail in multicast mode when the physical machines were not on the same subnet... E

Re: svn commit: r488807 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: PROPOSAL.txt docs_nopublish/

2006-12-19 Thread Jason Dillon
Is server/trunk/STATUS gonna move too? --jason On Dec 19, 2006, at 12:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: kevan Date: Tue Dec 19 12:51:10 2006 New Revision: 488807 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=488807 Log: Move old documents out of trunk into geronimo/private Removed:

[jira] Updated: (SM-782) Re-deploy with In-Only Mep

2006-12-19 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-782?page=all ] Grégoire A. updated SM-782: --- Attachment: MultiplexingConsumerProcessor.java.3.diff Now, the Context is remove. I normalized the attribute initialisation in onStart method. It could be safer to close

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M1 Release

2006-12-19 Thread Christopher M. Cardona
+1 chris Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was done by the lot of y'all :) I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm satisfied with the results. All modes of operation functioned well (SLSB, Direct, EJB and JPA). I

[jira] Commented: (SM-782) Re-deploy with In-Only Mep

2006-12-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-782?page=comments#action_37734 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-782: I think your modifications on the pendingExchanges map have no effect at all. Anyway, I will commit these changes as the code

[jira] Resolved: (SM-782) Re-deploy with In-Only Mep

2006-12-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-782?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-782. Fix Version/s: 3.1 Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Guillaume Nodet Author: gnodet Date: Tue Dec 19 15:17:57 2006 New Revision: 488850 URL: http://

Re: Undocumented stomp header?

2006-12-19 Thread Nathan Mittler
Ok, that clears it up. Thnx! On 12/19/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Dec 17, 2006, at 9:58 AM, Nathan Mittler wrote: > Hey guys, > I was just looking at the stomp transport and noticed what appears > to be an > undocumented extension to stomp adding a header for subscrip