On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Should probably still change the dep to help ensure compatibility.
Ensure compatibility how?
I said "help ensure compatibility"...
So that the spec is compiled against the same version that i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466656
]
Dain Sundstrom commented on GERONIMO-2768:
--
If you look at the pom:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibi
Enabling web statistics collection for jetty fails from the admin console
-
Key: GERONIMO-2775
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2775
Project: Geronimo
cannot create a new jetty http connector from console
-
Key: GERONIMO-2773
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2773
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul McMahan closed GERONIMO-2774.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-M2
> Server memory usage graph does not work
> -
On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Should probably still change the dep to help ensure compatibility.
Ensure compatibility how?
I said "help ensure compatibility"...
So that the spec is compiled against the same version that is
included in the server distribution.
--jason
thx for spotting this - the correction will be in the next major release
cheers,
Rob
On 22 Jan 2007, at 23:32, eguanlao wrote:
Will the misspelled word, "negociation" be changed to "negotiation"
in the
next release? There should be no spelling errors.
javax.jms.JMSException: Wire format ne
On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:34 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Should probably still change the dep to help ensure compatibility.
Ensure compatibility how?
-David
--jason
On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 22, 2007, at 7:45 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
The connector 1.5
Server memory usage graph does not work
---
Key: GERONIMO-2774
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2774
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Can the plugin installer detect usage of the old schema and
automatically convert up to the new schema?
Best wishes,
Paul
On 1/22/07, Jason Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When originally tackling this issue, my hope was to maintain backwards
compatibilty such that any existing xml files wou
Should probably still change the dep to help ensure compatibility.
--jason
On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 22, 2007, at 7:45 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
The connector 1.5 spec has dependency on jta-1.0.1B spec. Should
this be changed to jta_1.1? This would mea
When originally tackling this issue, my hope was to maintain backwards
compatibilty such that any existing xml files would not need to be modified
to work with this schema. I have since determined that this is most likely
not possible. To accomplish the goals of this jira, the current geronimo
v
On Jan 22, 2007, at 7:45 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
The connector 1.5 spec has dependency on jta-1.0.1B spec. Should
this be changed to jta_1.1? This would mean republishing the connector
spec..
That dep was marked as 'provided' so that the dep on
jta_1.0.1B won't pollute our build vi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Blevins closed GERONIMO-2770.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Ejb Deployment with no ejb-jar.xml
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Blevins closed GERONIMO-2772.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Support for EJB 3 descriptors and previous
> -
The connector 1.5 spec has dependency on jta-1.0.1B spec. Should
this be changed to jta_1.1? This would mean republishing the connector
spec..
Thanks
Anita
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
w
On Jan 22, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
It looks like we have the makings of the M2 milestone that has been
talked about. Dave and Dain made a huge chunk of code available so
that one can deploy and use (in limited ways) EJB 3.0. Very
impressed gents, kudos to the two of you.
Ok. All of these issues should be fixed.
-David
On Jan 22, 2007, at 4:46 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I was able to deploy the app successfully but only after using an
openejb-jar.xml.
Dain & Blevins,
On the irc discussion on Sat, 01/20, we th
On Jan 22, 2007, at 4:46 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I was able to deploy the app successfully but only after using an
openejb-jar.xml.
Dain & Blevins,
On the irc discussion on Sat, 01/20, we thought that an
openejb-jar.xml is not mandatory. I
Support for EJB 3 descriptors and previous
--
Key: GERONIMO-2772
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2772
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2769.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 498896. As a result of this change you may get different err
GlassFish specs are being included in 2.0-M2 builds
---
Key: GERONIMO-2771
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2771
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: publi
On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I was able to deploy the app successfully but only after using an
openejb-jar.xml.
Dain & Blevins,
On the irc discussion on Sat, 01/20, we thought that an
openejb-jar.xml is not mandatory. I debugged the builder and realized
the contrary.
In t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon reassigned GERONIMO-2768:
--
Assignee: Dain Sundstrom
Dain, can you please fix this version problem and re-releas
Ejb Deployment with no ejb-jar.xml
--
Key: GERONIMO-2770
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2770
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Aff
ClassFinder listAnnotations
---
Key: XBEAN-70
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-70
Project: XBean
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: David Blevins
Assigned To: David Blevins
Method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466599
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-2690:
This problem was noted in the discussion regarding this patch.
R
EarConfigBuilder ignores geronimo plan if no application.xml present
Key: GERONIMO-2769
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2769
Project: Geronimo
Issue Typ
On Jan 22, 2007, at 3:21 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Jarek,
I had the same error.
Try something like the following in your openejb-jar.xml
http://www.openejb.org/openejb-jar/1.1";>
deployment-id="samples/calculator/stateless
On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Jarek,
I had the same error.
Try something like the following in your openejb-jar.xml
http://www.openejb.org/openejb-jar/1.1";>
deployment-id="samples/calculator/stateless/
CalculatorLocal"
container-id="D
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-44?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37963
]
Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-44:
--
I've updated trunk to log all socket errors as is appropriate for the pl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466575
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2690:
I'm seeing this error when trying to open the classloader viewer
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Mittler closed AMQCPP-50.
Resolution: Fixed
Applied to trunk
> Derive cms::CMSException from std::exception
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tom Kaitchuck updated AMQ-845:
--
Attachment: patch.txt
I ment to add this file a while back and forgot, so it may be a little out of
d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul McMahan reassigned GERONIMO-2651:
--
Assignee: Tim McConnell (was: Paul McMahan)
Tim, IIUC you're looking into this issu
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Mittler closed AMQCPP-40.
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in trunk
> A few stray unix and sun defines
> -
On 1/22/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JSF is currently broken (was working in M1)
I don't think JSF was working in M1. What's currently in trunk is the
same as what was available in M1, which I think was called a
"non-functional" snapshot of apache myfaces. You may be thinking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2767:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.1)
1.1.2
updating 1.1.1 fix version to 1.1
There's a problem with JSTL where an application that is using it must
currently include a dependency in the Geronimo deployment plan against
the jstl jar (see my note to dev entitled "getting at META-INF in a
dependent jar" and GERONIMO-2650) .
...
jstl
jstl
...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2768:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Assignee: (was: Donald Woods)
Attached patch creat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2768:
---
Attachment: G2768.patch
> geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec is still using geronimo-ejb_2.
geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec is still using geronimo-ejb_2.1_spec instead
of new ejb_3.0_spec
--
Key: GERONIMO-2768
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GER
First of all, my apologies if this doesn't make complete sense. I'm not
sure how exactly we're supposed to be able to find the tag library
descriptors defined in META-INF of a jar. All I know for sure is that
we currently have a problem with tags in JSTL and I suspect JSF as well.
JSTL is
Minimize side effects of the offline deployer
-
Key: GERONIMO-2767
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2767
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (R
It looks like we have the makings of the M2 milestone that has been
talked about. Dave and Dain made a huge chunk of code available so
that one can deploy and use (in limited ways) EJB 3.0. Very
impressed gents, kudos to the two of you.
As we did for M1 I'd like to go ahead and branch tom
cannot restart a tomcat http connector from the console
---
Key: GERONIMO-2766
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2766
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Leve
FYI, this built for me. I removed my local maven repo.
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:57 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I'm trying it...
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Did anybody on windows totally nuked the local repo and tried to
build from scratc
On Jan 22, 2007, at 12:39 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Is anyone else seeing this in rev 498634 (latest)?
Hi Anita,
I'm running on 498317 and haven't seen a problem. I've just built
from latest source on another machine and it started fine.
I have noticed that mvn is seeming pretty ea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466529
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2709:
Thanks David. Not sure if I did anything special to generate the
I'm good from this morning.
On Jan 22, 2007, at 12:39 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Is anyone else seeing this in rev 498634 (latest)?
Thanks
Anita
..
.
n.jar;C:\
I have the same problem too. I now have to explicitly specify the plan
to get the desired configId.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/22/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, that did it! Thanks a lot! The tests deployed now and ran ok but
with small issues:
1) The module got deployed with a default
Tim,
A couple of questions on the design/implementation:
1) Since the module builders will get an updated deployment
descriptors, in general, the annotation processors in Tomcat, Jetty,
Web services, EJB, etc. will just need to lookup the resources in
JNDI, right?
2) One thing I'm unclear of is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2709.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-M2
Assignee: David Jencks
Fixed in rev
Ok, that did it! Thanks a lot! The tests deployed now and ran ok but
with small issues:
1) The module got deployed with a default moduleId instead of the one
I specified in the openejb-jar.xml file.
2) It looks like the ejb client support is now in a separate module
(used to be in openejb-core)
Is anyone else seeing this in rev 498634 (latest)?
Thanks
Anita
..
.
n.jar;C:\mytools\jdk1.5.0_08\jre\lib\sunrsasign.jar;C:\mytools\jdk1.5.0_08\jre\lib\jsse.jar;C:\my
Jarek,
I had the same error.
Try something like the following in your openejb-jar.xml
http://www.openejb.org/openejb-jar/1.1";>
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/19/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests
I worked on the EJB 3.0 samples over the weekend and finally got the
samples deployed. In the process, I also dug out some bugs in the
builder (http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=8479403&framed=y).
I might open a JIRA and fix it.
Here are the things that I found not quite working so fa
Offline deployment broken in geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.2-SNAPSHOT
---
Key: GERONIMO-2765
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2765
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466501
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2709:
I recreated the error on macos and verified that the patch fixes
Geronimo - Monday, January 22, 2007
5 Patches in RTC
[GERONIMO-2638] Improve ModuleBuilder and ConfigurationBuilder interfaces
to replace use of JarFile
- Assignee: Sachin Patel
- Reporter: Sachin Patel
- Created: Thu Dec 07 23:41:31 GMT 2006
- Updated: Fri Jan 05
Czesc Jacek,
The https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2762 contains a
simple test to show @Resource injection for entires in
your web.xml file. The current implementation right only only does a
simple JNDI lookup to inject the value. Which means only resources
explicitly defined in the
Hi,
Sorry to get back to you only now. I have captured the details of how
to set-up a demo system there:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Clustering
+Configuration+for+Jetty
I am putting the implementation of an integration test on hold as I
would like to start working on
Hi,
I am trying to get a reference to Session EJB from the web application.
It works if i give the ejb-ref like this in geronimo-web.xml
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming-1.1";>
ejb/TestBean
TestBean
If i add groupId, artifactid and version it throws a error
http://geronimo.apa
63 matches
Mail list logo
