Why do we have milestone releases for this spec?
This is very inconsistent with all of the other spec releases.
--jason
On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: hogstrom
Date: Fri Jan 26 22:22:04 2007
New Revision: 500487
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=
A Fei,
I recommend you cleanup your local repo a bit. One of the repo servers has
been serving up some bad content recently...
Start by removing \.m2\repository\org\apache\geronimo\genesis (and all sub
dirs). If that doesn't work (or you want to skip to the heavy handed
approach), just w
All,
I have made the binaries from Geronimo 2.0-M2 available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M2-rc1
In this directory you will find the various assemblies for your
review as well as one massive tar ball that has the various artifacts
that will ultimately be distributed
Folks,
Got this failure in trunk:
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo Configs :: OpenEJB
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
[INFO] [tools:
Hopefully this won't cause any problems...
Maven 2.0.4 has some issues with excludes where they become global
excludes when they should not be. Have you tried a clean build to
see if this works or not?
--jason
On Jan 26, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
David,
i took at stab
David,
i took at stab at this when i ran into this issue:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=500459
thanks,
dims
On 1/18/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 9:29 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>I looked at openejb3 pom at
> https://svn.apache.org/r
Now I've updated the openejb poms and attempted to deploy an openejb
snapshot.
The openejb deploy breaks when it gets to the samples but this is
apparently expected and means the deploy succeeded.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 26, 2007, at 3:53 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've opened http://jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-58?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38020
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-58:
After applying socketleak1.diff, I still see a leak when I start the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-58?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Albert Strasheim updated AMQCPP-58:
---
Attachment: socketleak1.diff
Patch for leak that happens when createConnection fails due t
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-58?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Albert Strasheim updated AMQCPP-58:
---
Attachment: leaker.cpp
Program I'm using to check for leaks.
> Possible memory leak when
What did you run? This worked great for me an Prasad.
Anyway, I changed the code to catch Exception instead of just
NamingExcetpion.
-dain
On Jan 26, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Dain,
This hack is causing problems:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.xbean.nami
I've opened http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2796 to describe my
understanding of what's going on.
There are at least 7 other maven issues that describe similar
problems. I'd appreciate it if everyone affected by this problem
could vote on this issue and maybe add comments.
Now I'll w
Anita figured out that replacing ${pom.version} with 3.0-incubating-
SNAPSHOT in openejb server pom fixes this problem. It turns out that
jason dillon previously ran into this problem in geronimo and
replaced all ${pom.version} in our poms with our own defined variable
${version}.
I'm inv
I have been experiencing problems with plexus artifacts downloaded
from the codehaus repo. More specifically, the problems are regarding
the plexus-compiler artifact and it's parent. The poms there have been
corrupted.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/26/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 26
On 1/26/07, Dave Colasurdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks... Have included the MDB restriction in the latest attachment.
BTW, The version in the 2.0-M2 branch is quite stale.
Can someone please refresh the copy at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0-M2/RELEASE-NOTE
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38017
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-56:
GCC 4.1.1 doesn't seem to like the AMQCPP_UNUSED macro -- something
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Mittler closed AMQCPP-56.
Resolution: Fixed
gcc problems fixed in trunk.
> GCC warnings and possible SocketFactory bug on
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38015
]
Sridhar Komandur commented on AMQ-920:
--
Rob/James,
I have two-way communication working on my desktop with Discov
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Mittler reopened AMQCPP-56:
--
still a few issues on os x
> GCC warnings and possible SocketFactory bug on 64-bit Linux
>
On Jan 26, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Fei Fei wrote:
so.please tell me what happened?why? isn't some plugins is not in
maven's repository(%HOME%/.m2/repository)?
thanks.
-A Fei-
A Fei,
I recommend you cleanup your local repo a bit. One of the repo
servers has been serving up some bad content rec
On Jan 26, 2007, at 12:21 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 26, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Thanks... Have made the updates...
Is there anything that should be added to the limitations section?
One of the things I mentioned in another email is that MDBs are
On 1/26/07, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 26, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
...
> What Maven's version are you using? I hope it is not 2.0.4 as it would
> be the answer to your question ;-)
The latest and greatest maven is v2.0.4. What other version should
we
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Mittler closed AMQCPP-57.
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in trunk
> Typo in names of delivery modes
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Mittler closed AMQCPP-56.
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in trunk. Tested in msvc with warning level at 3
> GCC warnings and po
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davanum Srinivas closed GERONIMO-2781.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Applied.
thanks,
dims
> Improved CXF-based POJO WebService suppo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467918
]
Davanum Srinivas commented on GERONIMO-2781:
Jarek,
Please check the svn revision 500348. Specificall
On Jan 26, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 1/26/07, Fei Fei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so.please tell me what happened?why?
I'm shooting in the dark, but it might eventually help.
What Maven's version are you using? I hope it is not 2.0.4 as it would
be the answer to your ques
Thanks... Have included the MDB restriction in the latest attachment.
BTW, The version in the 2.0-M2 branch is quite stale.
Can someone please refresh the copy at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0-M2/RELEASE-NOTES-2.0-M2.TXT
with the included attachment.
All futu
On 1/26/07, Fei Fei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so.please tell me what happened?why?
I'm shooting in the dark, but it might eventually help.
What Maven's version are you using? I hope it is not 2.0.4 as it would
be the answer to your question ;-)
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLask
Ideally you shouldn't have to. It looks like it's in the snapshot
repo. Anyone know why this doesn't get pulled down?
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 26, 2007, at 8:45 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Building openejb3 locally fixes the problem.
Jarek
On 1/26/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm
Removed. Thanks for pointing this out guys.
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 25, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
We shouldn't.
--jason
On Jan 25, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Doh! Why do we still generate them?
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 25, 2007, at 12:06 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
I
David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 26, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Thanks... Have made the updates...
Is there anything that should be added to the limitations section?
One of the things I mentioned in another email is that MDBs are
completely untested and should be assumed non-functi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-2781:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2781.patch
The patch also contains updated jaxws-war tests.
> Improve
Improved CXF-based POJO WebService support
--
Key: GERONIMO-2781
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2781
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular
On Jan 26, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Thanks... Have made the updates...
Is there anything that should be added to the limitations section?
One of the things I mentioned in another email is that MDBs are
completely untested and should be assumed non-functional.
Do we full
hello everyone.
I did something according to web page
"http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/building-apache-geronimo-with-maven-2.html",and
the source code of openejb is checkout successfully from apache
SVN:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openejb/trunk/openejb3.
the build log list foll
See EE.6.20, p. 140.
Paul
On 1/26/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/26/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI -- Java EE 5 requires support for JSP debugging.
Could you point to the page of Java EE 5 spec where it's described? I
wonder why it is so important that
Here's what seems to be the relevant section from the -X trace:
[DEBUG] Artifact not found - using stub model: System is offline.
org.apache.openejb:container:pom:3.0-incubating-20070126.103431-20
[DEBUG] Using defaults for missing POM
org.apache.openejb:container:pom:3.0-incubating-SNAPS
Thanks David! openejb-core still has dependency on
openejb-persistence:
org.apache.openejb
openejb-persistence
${pom.version}
The openejb-persistence module has been deleted from the source (rev
500244). Where has this been moved to?
Thanks
Anita
--- David Jencks <[EM
On Jan 26, 2007, at 1:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
so whats the stacktrace with -X? is this geronimo or maven
complaining? Is this pom in your local repo? If so is it
timestamped or -SNAPSHOT?
Maybe... just maybe we're getting closer :-)
Sorry, was on my way out the door...
This er
On 1/26/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI -- Java EE 5 requires support for JSP debugging.
Could you point to the page of Java EE 5 spec where it's described? I
wonder why it is so important that it went into the spec. I always
thought it was available.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
On 1/26/07, Ted Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Providing the org.apache.geronimo.home.dir system property to allow
the home directory to be passed in is good, but if this is not used
(and I'd don't feel it should be required/used in the normal case),
DirectoryUtils.getGeronimoInstallDirectory()
Ok, have added back the restriction regarding undeploying ejb modules
for 2.0-M2. Attaching the latest release notes to this email. Please
verify the eol characters are in the correct format..
Matt will add the Release Notes to the official build.
-Dave-
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Two issues he
so whats the stacktrace with -X? is this geronimo or maven
complaining? Is this pom in your local repo? If so is it timestamped
or -SNAPSHOT?
Maybe... just maybe we're getting closer :-)
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 26, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 26, 2007, at 11:45
On Jan 26, 2007, at 11:45 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 26, 2007, at 8:03 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
This is a fragment from openejb3/server's pom.xml. Could someone
please explain how this works?
I haven't investigate thoroughly, but I believe that this is an
easy way to make su
If you mean openejb/openejb then here it is, i don't have a openejb [d] as
you asked above. BTW I am new to maven, how would I build openejb3 locally,
I presume mvn sometarget ?
Thanks!!
org\apache\openejb\openejb\3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
org\apache\openejb\openejb\3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT\maven-
Two issues here -
1) Dain's fixes are in trunk. They have not been merged with the M2
changes yet. So at the moment, the M2 has these limitations.
2) This is a bigger issue. I don't see the Release Notes in the
unpacked server !!!
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/26/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Dain,
This hack is causing problems:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.xbean.naming.context.ContextFlyweight.listBindings(Context
Flyweight.java:92)
at org.apache.xbean.naming.context.ContextFederation.getFederatedBinding
s(ContextFederation.java:72)
at org.apache
FYI -- Java EE 5 requires support for JSP debugging. Geronimo's
tomcat6-jee5 and jetty6-jee5 assemblies satisfy this requirement by
using Jasper for JSP. I verified that JSP debug works properly in
those assemblies by starting them in debug mode, deploying a JSP that
contains a scriptlet , sett
On Jan 26, 2007, at 8:03 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
This is a fragment from openejb3/server's pom.xml. Could someone
please explain how this works?
I haven't investigate thoroughly, but I believe that this is an easy
way to make sure that if any container module references any server
Building openejb3 locally fixes the problem.
Jarek
On 1/26/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm seeing the same problem now.
Jarek
On 1/26/07, anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Could you please tell us the contents of org/apache/openejb/openejbd
> directory in your
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38011
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-46:
The memory leak an uncaught exception issues have been split out to
Exception is thrown when destroying consumer after connection failure
-
Key: AMQCPP-59
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-59
Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
Possible memory leak when reestablishing connection
---
Key: AMQCPP-58
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-58
Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions
Hi,
We're using ActiveMQ 4.1.0. We have code that periodically calls
ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createConnection() to try to reestablish a
connection when a broker fails. After some time, we were getting a heap
overflow if the broker does not come up.
We narrowed down the problem and can replicat
I'm seeing the same problem now.
Jarek
On 1/26/07, anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could you please tell us the contents of org/apache/openejb/openejbd
directory in your .m2 repo?
Thanks
Anita
--- Don Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a stable revisi
There were some changes made to JACC that requires us to release an
M2 of JACC. So, for Geronimo 2.0-M2 you'll need to build JACC
locally as a -M2 by updating its pom. I'll include that artifact in
the M2 release.
I finally got a good build this morning (lots of failures at Codehaus
ove
This is a fragment from openejb3/server's pom.xml. Could someone
please explain how this works?
Thanks
Anita
org.apache.openejb
container
${pom.version}
pom
compile
_
Add client for loan-broker-bpel
---
Key: SM-826
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-826
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: servicemix-bpe
Affects Versions: incubati
This is how I see it. The apps in geronimo/server/trunk/applications
should be the ones that are absolutely required by the server. Eg:
console, welcome app etc.
The optional apps like servlet-examples, jsp-examples should be moved
elsewhere to a samples directory or project. There is no need to
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-470:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> servicemix-http has no way to set a soap actio
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-532:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> Allow easier deployment of endpoints using ser
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-556:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> CIMERO Eclipse plugin
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-557:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> WSDL 1.1 message normalization for the service
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-575:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> servicemix-common base classes are not designe
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-580:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> Support for standard POST request from the pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-611:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> Reduce non-optional core dependencies
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-624:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> Failed unit test (servicemix-core) :
> org.ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-628:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.jms.JMSFlow
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-626:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> Failed unit test (servicemix-core) :
> org.ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-627:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> Failed unit test (servicemix-core) :
> org.ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-625:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> Failed unit test (servicemix-core) :
> org.ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-642:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> org.apache.servicemix.components.saaj.SaajSoap
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-629:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.Transactio
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-750:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> ClientFactory should implement java.io.Seriali
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-724:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> able to write marshaller for JBI components
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-679:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> Add map support for Ehcache
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-807:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
> Add jboss-service.xml to servicemix component
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-717.
Resolution: Fixed
> Upgrade to geronimo 1.2, jencks 2.0, activemq 4.1, lingo 1.1
>
Could you please tell us the contents of org/apache/openejb/openejbd
directory in your .m2 repo?
Thanks
Anita
--- Don Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a stable revision to build from, I am new to this
> community
> and wanted to understand the process.
>
> I am cur
Hi Lin,
No more class loading issues right now. It looks now there is a
Unmarshalling problem of SOAP request. That is the progress ;).
There might be some missing properties in the Axis2 integration side of
code and right now I am investigating it.
Also please don't take me as a blocker here and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467839
]
Tim McConnell commented on GERONIMO-2651:
-
Hi Kirsh, would you attach the WAR file you tried this with so
Hi,
I am looking for a stable revision to build from, I am new to this community
and wanted to understand the process.
I am currenly getting from the trunk, where should I be pulling src from for
stable m1 or m2, a revision would help I guess unless someone could help me
with this error.
[INFO]
Providing the org.apache.geronimo.home.dir system property to allow
the home directory to be passed in is good, but if this is not used
(and I'd don't feel it should be required/used in the normal case),
DirectoryUtils.getGeronimoInstallDirectory() is used to determine the
home directory. This me
I was double checking the messaging components in Daytrader and noticed that
the topic-based MDBs are not firing. The queue-based MDBs are working
correctly. I am currently running Daytrader 1.2 on Geronimo 1.1.1.
I was wondering if anyone could provide the following...
- tips on tracing MDB act
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-825.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date:
On Jan 26, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Thanks... Have made the updates...
Well, we need to be sure these changes are included in M2. I'm not
sure where Matt is in terms of building an RC.
--kevan
Is there anything that should be added to the limitations section?
Do we fu
David,
Did this change make it into the 2.0-M2 branch and the image that Matt
is creating for a vote?
Joe
David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 25, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Limitations:
- Undeploying an ejb module will not remove it's beans. The
server has to be restarted
Duplicated dependencies in the top pom
--
Key: SM-825
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-825
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: servicemix-assembly
Affects
Thanks... Have made the updates...
Is there anything that should be added to the limitations section? Do
we fully support EJB 3.0?
-Dave-
David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 25, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Limitations:
- Undeploying an ejb module will not remove it's beans.
Ok, have clarified this in the release notes..
Thanks
-Dave-
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 25, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
- Deployment with no ejb-jar.xml or openejb-jar (just need a
geronimo-openejb.xml for all the geronimo-specific deployment stuff)
To be clear, the geronimo-
On Jan 26, 2007, at 2:39 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Anyone seeing weird artifact downloads, like:
Downloading: http://repository.codehaus.org/junit/junit/3.8.1/
junit-3.8.1.jar
897b downloaded
[WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Error retrieving checksum file for
junit/junit/3.8.1/junit-3.8.1.ja
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38009
]
Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-57:
--
Oops - good find :)
While changing it to -TENT would cause compatibilit
Typo in names of delivery modes
---
Key: AMQCPP-57
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-57
Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: CMS Impl
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Albert Strasheim reopened AMQ-1082:
---
Hope I have the right issue here.
When running our fast producer, slow consumer unit test for
On Jan 25, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Limitations:
- Undeploying an ejb module will not remove it's beans. The
server has to be restarted to deploy the same module again.
Ok, I've implemented undeploy and verified it works using the
calculator sample app. I can gua
96 matches
Mail list logo
