Welcome and congrats Jarek!!!
Chris
On 3/20/07, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Congratulations Jarek!!!
Joe
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> All,
>
> Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
>
> Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
> our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-2997:
--
Attachment: G2997.patch
> jaxws-war test: axis2 no longer need the jaxb generated files
> -
jaxws-war test: axis2 no longer need the jaxb generated files
--
Key: GERONIMO-2997
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2997
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Congratulations Jarek!!!
Joe
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has recently accepted an
invitati
On 3/20/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think we've been specific enough about what goes where for
jason's proposal to make sense yet, as gianni points out.
I'm sure we don't want all 100K artifacts we produce all under o.a.g
or o.a.g.server
I mostly definitely agree. In t
belated congrats
-sachin
On Mar 20, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has rec
Congratulations Jarek!!! :)
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has recently accepted an
invitation
Many Congrats Jarek
Lasantha
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has recently accepted an
invit
Welcome aboard, Jarek!
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has recently accepted an
invitation to jo
Congratulations Jarek.
- Shiva
On 3/20/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and
Congrats Jarek!
--kevan
Congratulations Jarek.
Vamsi
On 3/20/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and ha
Congrats Jarek!!!
Cheers!
Hernan
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has recently accepted an
invit
Congrats Jarek!
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> All,
>
> Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
>
> Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
> our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
> for Geronimo for quite some time and has recently accepted an
> invitatio
Congrats Jarek
On 3/20/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has recently acce
Congrats Jarek!
On 3/20/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has recently acc
Awesome ! Congrats Jarek !
Cheers
Prasad
On 3/20/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think we've been specific enough about what goes where for
> jason's proposal to make sense yet, as gianni points out.
>
> I'm sure we don't want all 100K artifacts we produce all under o.a.g
>
> or o.a.g.server
I do not see why te
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has recently accepted an
invitation to join the Geronimo project as a committer.
Welcome
'mvn test' runs the test lifecycle for child modules under that pom.
So it depends on where in the project tree you run that command.
That being said, the testsuite pom is configured to skip tests in the
'test' phase and execute it in the 'integration-test' phase. So 'mvn
test' in the testsuite p
I don't think we've been specific enough about what goes where for
jason's proposal to make sense yet, as gianni points out.
I'm sure we don't want all 100K artifacts we produce all under o.a.g
or o.a.g.server
I was assuming that o.a.g.server would basically have the kernel and
system stu
On 20/03/2007, at 6:15 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Mar 19, 2007, at 6:52 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
And perhaps change the 'applications' groupId to simply 'apps'...
anyways, we'd end up with ids like:
testsupport/* org.apache.geronimo.server
modules/* or
We might need to watch out for windows path length problems as a
result of this change -- they were the reason for the former peculiar
name.
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 19, 2007, at 6:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jdillon
Date: Mon Mar 19 15:35:23 2007
New Revision: 520132
URL: h
geronimo-naming jar
I think you'll find you need to update xbean-naming.
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:03 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
The server/trunk build is picking this up in configs/rmi-naming...
but from where?
Need to update this to use java.util.concurrent... its using
bac
On 20/03/2007, at 6:12 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I briefly looked into adding this... but looks like a lot of the
bootstrap plumbing has changed. I'm a bit bewildered as to why we
are booting up a temporary kernel before we get to command-line
option parsing. I'm also a bit mystified as to
On 3/20/07, Rossmanith, Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Once you have the JBIContainer, just retrieve the needed interface:
> JBIContainer container = dci.getContainer();
> AdminCommandsServiceMBean admin =
container.getAdminCommandsService();
>
> Then, you can use it to deploy /
testsuite is the integrate test and test under trunk is the unit test.
Am i right?
I want to get the unit test result, and there is *.txt and *.xml
result in surefire directory.
But the *.html is not there.
2007/3/20, Sean Qiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
is there any difference between "mvn test" unde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482350
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2995:
It _may_ be unrelated... I can't tell at the moment.
> Weed out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482348
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2995:
There may be an issue with AMQ, TCK is puking up a bunch of thing
Hi,
> Once you have the JBIContainer, just retrieve the needed interface:
> JBIContainer container = dci.getContainer();
> AdminCommandsServiceMBean admin =
container.getAdminCommandsService();
>
> Then, you can use it to deploy / undeploy, manage life cycle, etc ..
>admin.installComponen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482346
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2995:
This is *mostly* done... we still need to include backport for rm
is there any difference between "mvn test" under trunk and "mvn" in
trunk/testsuite?
best regard.
2007/3/19, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You can/should generate the testsuite report from the trunk/testsuite directory.
For the best results, change the
element to a local directory and t
The server/trunk build is picking this up in configs/rmi-naming...
but from where?
Need to update this to use java.util.concurrent... its using backport-
concurrent-util at the moment.
--jason
101 - 133 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
