I think it is a good idea! But it might be hard to test eventually.
Cheers,
Thomas
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'd like to start a discussion on splitting the container and
components release cycles. What do people think about that ?
Should we keep the container and all the components in a
If we go that way, how could we deal with the examples ?
I guess they would either require the use to download the components,
or be available on a separate distros (and thus have their own
release cycle too).
Ideally needs a Maven-like dependency management system for components
so that you
Hey, I've just svn up and I have the following problem when bulding:
[INFO] Surefire report directory:
c:\java\servicemix\clean\deployables\bindingcomponents\servicemix-jms\target\surefire-reports
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireExecutionException: Unable to
create test class
Fix XSD schema locations for use with plain spring
--
Key: SM-992
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-992
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Guillaume
I was mainly refering to the examples that come with the default
distribution of
ServiceMix. The distribution includes the container, some configuration files,
JBI components and demos.
We already have some TCK stuff which is not available publicly due to the need
for an NDA mainly.
But I
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39602
]
Jim ogunjimi commented on SM-960:
-
Dear Jira,
I tried to use the example orcherstration with jsr181 but it is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509785
]
Paul Grove commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
-
Any news on this issue as this is holding up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509792
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
--
I'm using the latest Geronimo plugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509805
]
Erik-Berndt Scheper commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
--
OK, please help me how to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509817
]
Paul Grove commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
-
Jacek,
I have deployed the unstable plug-in to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509820
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
--
I don't know about the process of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509825
]
Paul Grove commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
-
Jacek,
I have tested this file
I would be happy to see the work on Admin Console Portlet for Auto
Generating Geronimo Deployment Plan getting complete and shipped with AG
2.1. May be I am a bit too ambitious, but an ultimate test would be: portlet
auto generating the deployment plan for 'Daytrader' application ;-)
- Shiva
On
+1
I'm all for more work on the console bits.
--jason
On Jul 3, 2007, at 4:07 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
I would be happy to see the work on Admin Console Portlet for Auto
Generating Geronimo Deployment Plan getting complete and shipped
with AG 2.1. May be I am a bit too ambitious, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509838
]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
---
The eclipse plugin that is currently on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee: Sachin Patel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509873
]
Daniel Kulp commented on GERONIMO-3265:
---
CXF does use spring. However, we pull in 2.0.4 (and work fine
ejb 3.0 annotation converter for j2g
Key: GERONIMO-3299
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3299
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-3299:
---
Attachment: AnnotationConverter.java
ejb 3.0 annotation converter for j2g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-3299:
---
Attachment: (was: AnnotationConverter.java)
ejb 3.0 annotation converter for
Hi ,
From Paul's mail I guess a Geronimo plugin would be
the way forward. I am going to list down a few more questions on the
scenarios that Sebastien has explained. The scenarios are given first
and then my understanding, approach and issues. I would be just
listing two of the
On Jul 2, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
*Dynamic Console for managing installed artifacts*
Improve the console framework to allow installed artifacts to
register a portlet for managing the configuration. For highest
level of flexibility a component would provide the required
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509910
]
Paul Grove commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
-
I think this should be re-opens as I take back
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509911
]
Paul Grove commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
-
As per my comment above the Version of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509917
]
Paul Grove commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
-
Sorry having a bad afternoon the version should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3269:
---
Component/s: (was: console)
kernel
Priority: Critical
I was also thinking about the delivered server (since we have been
discussing footprint).
Perhaps we could deliver Geronimo as two pieces:
1) A minimal server that provides a console for adding plugins or plugin
'packages' (ie: certified jee5 tomcat server)
2) An archived plugin repository.
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both lists)
Hi ,
I vote for not splitting releases. The way it is now, we dont need to worry
about versions as everything is the same number. External components (like
Apache Ode) have their own versions already so...
On 7/3/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was mainly refering to the examples
Upgrade Dojo to 0.9
---
Key: GERONIMO-3300
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3300
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: console
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-3069:
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug)
Parent: GERONIMO-3300
Rework AJAX style
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-3050:
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement)
Parent: GERONIMO-3300
Create a JPA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510023
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3300:
When is 0.9 supposed to be released? We shouldn't upgrade to a
+1 as this would provide a common schema for other vendor implementations
(like MySQL, Oracle, DB2, ...)
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
The page has been updated to move the contents of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-3299:
---
Attachment: geronimo-3299.patch
this patch adds the ability to convert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510033
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3269:
I'm holding off committing this patch, as I would like someone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510038
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-3300:
-
It will be a while before I have completed the changes to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510062
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3300:
I would argue that it should go into the 2.1 stream. If we have
38 matches
Mail list logo
