Simplify security authentication framework by removing "mixed" local/remote
logins.
---
Key: GERONIMO-3303
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3303
Projec
So its a year and a half later I've finally made a bit of
progress on the first of these goals.
Recently I replaced the only use of remote login with login over the
openejb protocol. This means that the client/server-side distinction
is no longer relevant, and the login module wrapping
Short answer:
The plan is to pick up Tomcat 6.1.0 when it becomes available. Right
now that branch is undergoing significant rework for comet support so
I wouldn't expect a release until it stabilizes.
Long answer:
GERONIMO-3206 describes how Geronimo's Tomcat component is currently
built
On Jul 9, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Kevan,
I'll work on it.
Cool. Thanks, Prasad.
--kevan
On Jul 9, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Ashish Jain wrote:
Hi!!
I am working on compilation of the new features in AG2.0.Can some
one please help me to get information on the major architectural
changes in AG2.0,the new features added into AG2.0.
Some of the new features which I have looked on is th
Hi!!
I am working on compilation of the new features in AG2.0.Can some one please
help me to get information on the major architectural changes in AG2.0,the
new features added into AG2.0.
Some of the new features which I have looked on is the property substitution
in AG2.0,the viewer portlet in
What's the status of a new Tomcat release before we release 2.0?
We still have the private patches/build from GERONIMO-3010/3206 and another
bug opened by Vamsi in GERONIMO-3273.
-Donald
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
We've gone through the CTS grind and came out victorious
http://java.sun.com/javaee
Kevan,
I'll work on it.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/9/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The
> other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had
> issues so I'll
On Jun 13, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The
other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had
issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them.
Thanks for your critical eyes.
OK. In my eyes, this vote has b
I deployed the activemq-broker and system-database plugins (the
latter had a stale reference to geronimo-transaction-jta11). Please
give it another try.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 7, 2007, at 10:49 PM, Ajay Panagariya wrote:
Hi,
I just checked out the current trunk, and deployed the mini
+1
Vamsi
On 6/9/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/
~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes on Monday, June 1
On Jul 8, 2007, at 1:03 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Trying the link
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-2.0/repository/
indicates the apache snapshot repo is being used... which makes me
think that perhaps the problem is that no recent snapshots for
geronimo have been deployed?
Yes I
+1
-Donald
Jarek Gawor wrote:
I second that. I'm also waiting for Activation spec to be released in
order to publish a new javamail snapshot (need latest javamail for
Axis2).
Jarek
On 7/4/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unless someone actually wants to try to fix the scm sections
13 matches
Mail list logo
