OpenEJB trunk at 562838
Geronimo Revision: 562838 built with tests included
See the full build-0400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070805/build-0400.log
1K downloaded
Downloading:
http://download.java.net/maven/1//org.apache.maven.wagon/poms/wagon-providers-1.0-beta
OpenEJB trunk at 562866
Geronimo Revision: 562867 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070805/build-1000.log
1K downloaded
Downloading:
http://download.java.net/maven/1//org.apache.maven.wagon/poms/wagon-providers-1.0-beta-2
OpenEJB trunk at 562920
Geronimo Revision: 562928 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070805/build-1400.log
1K downloaded
Downloading:
http://download.java.net/maven/1//org.apache.maven.wagon/poms/wagon-providers-1.0-beta-2
Are you going to include this in branches/2.0 for a 2.0.1 release?
-Donald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: linsun
Date: Sat Aug 4 21:03:38 2007
New Revision: 562816
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=562816
Log:
oops missed two spots on formatting
Modified:
On 8/4/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, the theory under which we (geronimo) has been operating is that
the sun copyright and legal statements apply to the text
documentation in the schemas and that once that is removed the rest
forms a part of the javaee specifications that we
On 8/4/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I see it there are two kinds of questions I'm asking:
1. Are the 6 questionable jars (4 I already mentioned plus a servlet
spec jar with some retyped sun xsds and dtds) OK to release?
Obviously the geronimo PMC thought so but this
On Aug 4, 2007, at 12:15 PM, David Jencks wrote:
2. Hypothetically, starting from the cddl licensed schemas, what
can we generate from them, what can we include in apache svn and
releases, and what license is any of this under? The geronimo pmc
has previously thought that generated
Matt is having some email difficulties. So, I offered to call this
vote in his stead.
This vote passes with 14 +1 votes.
--kevan
On Jul 31, 2007, at 11:21 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the Genesis release of 1.2. At this
location you will find a tar ball with the
Matt is having some email difficulties. So, I offered to call this
vote, instead.
The dependent Genesis vote has passed.
This vote passes with 13 +1 votes.
--kevan
On Aug 2, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
Please take a peek at the jar files for the txManagr components
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517795
]
Greg Wilkins commented on GERONIMO-1686:
Jetty has switched to directly using the source checked out from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Wilkins closed GERONIMO-1686.
--
Resolution: Fixed
changes appear to have been merged via other paths.
Servlet 2.5 and JSP
the full build-1800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070805/build-1800.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070805
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO
PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenEJB trunk at 562974
Geronimo Revision: 562977 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070805/build-1800.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070805
[INFO] Reactor Summary
I updated the version number to 2.0 from 2.0-SNAPSHOT. These
artifacts should not be deployed as they have the official 2.0
version number.
Also, updated the versions of many released artifacts to they're
appropriate released version numbers.
We should be about ready to build and start
14 matches
Mail list logo
