[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-3089:
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2)
(was: 2.0)
2.0.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3059.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Looks like this has been fixed.
> CLIs refactoring - options and argume
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3351:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1
2.0.x
Fix Version/s:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2884:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0)
2.0.x
> JNDI Name Not Correct
> ---
InvalidConfigurationException is thrown when starting the plugins from the
console
---
Key: GERONIMO-3382
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3382
Projec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1907:
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.x)
(was: 2.0)
2.0.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2025:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0)
2.0.x
Moving to 2.0.x
> Undeploy and r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-807.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Applied patch and tested and it works. The text for criteria is still wipe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1567:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0)
2.0.x
Moving to 2.0.x
> Plan XML files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-2581.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Version changes complete for 2.0.
> Update Version Numbers of Dependent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3353.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Changed default to:
Committed revision 563399.
> Adjust server log4j f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3305.
---
Close pending Jarek's comments and changes.
> Out Of Memory Error when Running DayTrader in W
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3196.
---
Closing per Jarek's comments.
> ConcurrentModificationException in ?wsdl processing
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3332.
---
Closing as the problem could not be recreated.
> POJO Web-services under Geronimo fail with a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3352.
---
Closing as it has been resolved and committed.
> Upgrade to Jetty 6.1.5 (just released) for G
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3365.
---
Assignee: Jarek Gawor
Closing as it has been resolved and committed.
> config.xml conditi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3368.
---
Closing as it has been resolved and committed.
> Axis2ClientConfigurationFactory not always b
Hi,
I just checkout gerenimo and start building , but seems to be the
building is failed at org.apache.geronimo.security.jaas.LoginKerberosTest.
since the test is failed.Any updates on this?
Regrads!
Duminda
--
Hasta la victoria siempè!
--- Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is crude!! First I ran the build on
> modules\geronimo-j2ee-builder with
> IBMJDK1.5.0 with tests turned off to be able to build the module.
> Then I
> ran the build (not a clean build) with SunJDK1.5.0 with tests on and
> the
> tests pa
On Aug 6, 2007, at 8:12 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I certainly agree with your goal but am less sure about your
proposed naming and organization. Also from looking at your list
it took me a couple minutes to figure out what is removed from
"server"
I've been thinking that we could proceed
After a little more discussion on legal-discuss and considering that
the legal-discuss discussion is about cddl licensed schemas which are
not the ones we are using and we are following the same procedure we
have used before I'm reinstating my +1 vote.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 4, 2007, a
After a little more discussion on legal-discuss and considering that
the legal-discuss discussion is about cddl licensed schemas which are
not the ones we are using and we are following the same procedure we
have used before I'm reinstating my +1 vote.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 4, 2007, a
On Aug 6, 2007, at 12:43 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On Aug 6, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
we should consider the more drastic changes, like moving the base
Admin Console support (via Pluto 1.2) out to /plugins
I really like that idea for a couple of reasons -
- it allows us to kee
On Aug 6, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
we should consider the more drastic changes, like moving the base
Admin Console support (via Pluto 1.2) out to /plugins
I really like that idea for a couple of reasons -
- it allows us to keep the admin console that's currently at server/
tru
On Aug 6, 2007, at 11:25 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 6, 2007, at 6:16 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Here's where things stand at the moment
Specs
We have a vote on 3 spec releases that have been held up by a CDDL
licensing issue. After reviewing the issues, I don't think these
specs have a
I'd rather not have another level to simply separate code jars from
config jars... I think they should all live together, and if needed
we suffix the config bits with "-config", so you'd have:
activemq-broker
activemq-broker-config
activemq-ra
activemq-ra-config
IMO, no need for
On Aug 6, 2007, at 9:59 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Anything more than 6 to 8 groupings could cause chaos (just like at
our current release process which takes weeks to get everything
voted and released...)
Yes, it has to be done very carefully, though if you look a Maven,
Plexus and the relat
Another thought (now that I had some lunch)
What if we create a "builders/deployers" grouping, which contained the modules
and configs needed for each builder, like -
deployers
myfaces
modules
geronimo-myfaces
David,
To be clear, you will take care of this whenever you can attend to it...
Right?
Vamsi
On 8/6/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was hoping to get to this today. I need to move the commented out stuff
> to the plugins area and I'd like to make it so the code removal on all
Anything more than 6 to 8 groupings could cause chaos (just like at our
current release process which takes weeks to get everything voted and released...)
We already have 5 groupings created -
- devtools (Eclipse, Netbeans, J2G)
- plugins (non-JEE5 required server add-ons)
- samples (should cont
OpenEJB trunk at
Geronimo Revision: 563183 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1240.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070806/build-1240.log
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 'org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils:pom:1.0.4'
from repository java
Here are my results -
1) Rebuilt Specs 1.4 and 1.5 on Linux with Sun 1.5.0_11 and the released
maven-xmlbeans-plugin-2.3.1.
2) Built the server on Linux w/ IBM 1.5.0 SR4 (except for geronimo-corba which
requires Sun JDK) with the released maven-xmlbeans-plugin-2.3.1 and tests
enabled - everythi
This is crude!! First I ran the build on modules\geronimo-j2ee-builder with
IBMJDK1.5.0 with tests turned off to be able to build the module. Then I
ran the build (not a clean build) with SunJDK1.5.0 with tests on and the
tests passed!!
--vamsi
On 8/6/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/6/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here's where things stand at the moment
>
> Specs
> We have a vote on 3 spec releases that have been held up by a CDDL
> licensing issue. After reviewing the issues, I don't think these
> specs have a problem. They are not built with CDDL licen
On Aug 6, 2007, at 6:16 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Here's where things stand at the moment
Specs
We have a vote on 3 spec releases that have been held up by a CDDL
licensing issue. After reviewing the issues, I don't think these
specs have a problem. They are not built with CDDL licensed
ma
Even better if the code is moved to plugins and removed from server tree at
the same time.
--vamsi
On 8/6/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was hoping to get to this today. I need to move the commented out stuff
> to the plugins area and I'd like to make it so the code removal o
Um, I just took a blind stab in the dark...
But, what I was thinking was that we have the core modules which are
the bare minimum to boot up a functional Geronimo server w/o any
JavaEE muck, then slice up the other components into plugins, though
they don't really need to be G plugins, the
I was hoping to get to this today. I need to move the commented out
stuff to the plugins area and I'd like to make it so the code removal
on all branches is linked in svn.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 6, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
As part of "GERONIMO-3340 Take apache direc
I certainly agree with your goal but am less sure about your proposed
naming and organization. Also from looking at your list it took me a
couple minutes to figure out what is removed from "server"
I've been thinking that we could proceed by turning bits of the
server into plugins. For in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig updated GERONIMO-3381:
Attachment: geronimo-3381.patch
Corrected very small missing character (read: typo) in c
Error launching jsrc2g from within eclipse if no jsp sources are selected
-
Key: GERONIMO-3381
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3381
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig updated GERONIMO-3342:
Attachment: (was: geronimo-3342update3.patch)
> Provide a way to launch J2G componen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R updated GERONIMO-3380:
--
Attachment: geronimo-web2.xml
BankDBPool2.xml
> Derby embedded datab
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517941
]
Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMO-3380:
---
The wizard generated deployment plan for database pool is s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R updated GERONIMO-3380:
--
Attachment: geronimo-web.xml
WebAppJDBCAccess.war
Ban
Derby embedded database pool created from console doesn't work
--
Key: GERONIMO-3380
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3380
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3317:
---
Patch Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
Here's where things stand at the moment
Specs
We have a vote on 3 spec releases that have been held up by a CDDL
licensing issue. After reviewing the issues, I don't think these
specs have a problem. They are not built with CDDL licensed
materials. We start to rebase our specs on CDDL lice
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-3379:
---
Attachment: geronimo-3379.patch
> j2g: stalls in the middle of parsing a jbosscmp-
j2g: stalls in the middle of parsing a jbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Key: GERONIMO-3379
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3379
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Le
As part of "GERONIMO-3340 Take apache directory plugin out of the main
build, put it in plugins.", the directory server code has been disabled from
the main build in rev 558213 (prior to creating branches\2.0), by commenting
out the entries in pom.xml, but the code has been left in the trunk as it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517894
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3340:
---
Do we need the directory related code in branches\2
Yes I made a comment in the JIRA 3378- I was not able to build
branches/2.0 on Sat. nite. I'll try build it today.
Lin
Donald Woods wrote:
Are you going to include this in branches/2.0 for a 2.0.1 release?
-Donald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: linsun
Date: Sat Aug 4 21:03:38 2007
New R
I guess the startup screen need not list all possible URLs to access each
application. One per app should be good enough for the user to quick
start. "Easy to use" is our first guiding principle. We will not want a
user to struggle finding out the URL of welcome app!!!
Vamsi
On 8/6/07, Kevan M
Yes, it does :o)
Vamsi
On 8/6/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yay, doesn't cleaning up feel good, all nice and shinny :-P
> --jason
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2007, at 3:15 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
>
> Removed in Revision: 563088
>
> --vamsi
>
> On 5/8/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Aug 6, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I think it makes more sense w/o the full url bits, since those are
highly dependent on how you configured the connectors.
Ya. I understood that when I asked. And don't necessarily disagree
with where we end up. We might consider tweaking the
Branches 2.0 is now 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT.
2.0.0 is the release branch and is considered stable if there is
such a thing. The final bits and moving of stuff to prepare for a
release makes it easier to have it separate.
On Aug 6, 2007, at 4:22 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I think I missed some discu
Yay, doesn't cleaning up feel good, all nice and shinny :-P
--jason
On Aug 6, 2007, at 3:15 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Removed in Revision: 563088
--vamsi
On 5/8/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I concur...if there are no objections by the end of the week I'll
delete it.
O
Removed in Revision: 563088
--vamsi
On 5/8/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I concur...if there are no objections by the end of the week I'll
> delete it.
>
>
> On May 3, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
> > m4 never got cooked fully, which is why the branch is still there.
I guess branches\2.0-M4 can be deleted now.
--vamsi
On 5/8/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I concur...if there are no objections by the end of the week I'll
> delete it.
>
>
> On May 3, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
> > m4 never got cooked fully, which is why the branc
Aighty... still seems weird, but okay :-)
--jason
On Aug 6, 2007, at 2:04 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
2.0 release will be based on branches/2.0.0 (and I guess, will be
tagged tags\2.0 later on). branches\2.0 is now 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT.
--vamsi
On 8/6/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39860
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-939:
New patch applied.
> CXF based Service Engine and Bnding Component
> -
2.0 release will be based on branches/2.0.0 (and I guess, will be tagged
tags\2.0 later on). branches\2.0 is now 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT.
--vamsi
On 8/6/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think I missed some discussion or something... but what is the
> difference between these 2 branches:
Hiya, I've mentioned this before... and now that we have a 2.0 branch
and trunk has moved on to 2.1 work, I think its time we really make a
decision on this and implement it.
Before, I had been thinking of keeping all of the modules in the
server/trunk tree just in better locations organize
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517855
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-1761:
Um, why not just {{geronmo-crypto}}, it may contain some wrapper
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Freeman Fang updated SM-939:
Attachment: patch0806.txt
> CXF based Service Engine and Bnding Component
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517853
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2401:
I really think that we should really think about using slf4j inst
I think it makes more sense w/o the full url bits, since those are
highly dependent on how you configured the connectors.
--jason
On Aug 2, 2007, at 6:25 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Yup...
The old messages made no sense at all...because Web application !=
connector and therefore its not fair
I think I missed some discussion or something... but what is the
difference between these 2 branches:
server/branches/2.0
server/branches/2.0.0
?
--jason
On Aug 5, 2007, at 7:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I updated the version number to 2.0 from 2.0-SNAPSHOT. These
artifacts shou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517841
]
YunFeng Ma commented on GERONIMO-3317:
--
I retested my sample using latest geronimo and the "has not been enha
70 matches
Mail list logo
