[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3481) Offline deployer throws BIND Exception when port 1099 is in use

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3481: -- Affects Version/s: 2.1 2.0.x > Offline deployer throw

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3481) Offline deployer throws BIND Exception when port 1099 is in use

Offline deployer throws BIND Exception when port 1099 is in use --- Key: GERONIMO-3481 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-217) Installation directory inconsistent across the various versions of the Geronimo server

Installation directory inconsistent across the various versions of the Geronimo server -- Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-217 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-217

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-216) Remote server support

Remote server support - Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-216 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-216 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: Improvement Components: eclipse-plugin Affects Version

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3480) ManagedConnectionFactory can have properties not mentioned in the config-properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-3480: --- Description: Ed Hillman and earlier Hiram Chirino have pointed out to me that the j2ca spe

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3480) ManagedConnectionFactory can have properties not mentioned in the config-properties

ManagedConnectionFactory can have properties not mentioned in the config-properties --- Key: GERONIMO-3480 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3480 Projec

[jira] Reopened: (GERONIMO-3425) Add deployment plan schemas to geronimo web site

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller reopened GERONIMO-3425: Well, not quite what I had hoped for... The doc is great. However... Note how the following

Re: automatic builds with tests

On Sep 19, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: OK. I have enabled the unit tests to run on all builds for both trees (2.0 and trunk). The testsuite presently runs only with all 2.0 builds. I'm soon going to enable it to run on all trunk builds too. Now that all tests are running, there wi

Re: XML Schemas on the site

On Sep 18, 2007, at 7:07 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: I talked with Dave Blevins about this, maybe I got it wrong. Dave can you take a look at this? We should still use the same schema from G 1.2 for now. There's a lot of documentation for it, it's used in the tck, the j2g tool uses it. It

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

would any of these samples work for further testing? http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html Cheers! Hernan Erik B. Craig wrote: Lin, On 9/19/07, *Lin Sun* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I started looking at the J2G documentation on

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

speaking of which, and maybe is for a different thread. Have you been using maven 2 for those apps? If so, have you used any template? The reason I'm asking is because with Prasad and Viet we've been trying to figure out a way to consolidate all the sample applications as well as providing som

[BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 577451

OpenEJB trunk at 0 Geronimo Revision: 577451 built with tests included See the full build-1600.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070919/build-1600.log [INFO] Installing /home/prasad/geronimo/2.0/configs/webservices-common/target/webservices-common-2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.car

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

Yes, they would, actually... I have done some amount of testing using the sample migration apps, although it was with the versions that are present in the Geronimo 1.1 wiki pages, not the Geronimo 2.0 wiki pages. J2G was successful on these 1.1 applications as well, however the migration applicati

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

On 9/19/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > speaking of which, and maybe is for a different thread. Have you been > using maven 2 for those apps? > If so, have you used any template? Nope, I have left them as-is for compilation/packaging. All of the ones I have personally touched hav

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

Haha, yes, 'interesting' is certainly one way to put it =P The ones that are in the 2.0 wiki should be quite a bit better though, since we've (Viet and myself) have been collaborating on getting them cleaned up and making sure they work on jboss and geronimo alike, as well as having accurate docume

Re: automatic builds with tests

OK. I have enabled the unit tests to run on all builds for both trees (2.0 and trunk). The testsuite presently runs only with all 2.0 builds. I'm soon going to enable it to run on all trunk builds too. Now that all tests are running, there will be only 4 builds a day - 4 am, 10 am, 4 pm and 10 pm

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

Erik, Thanks for your answer. I thought it did support 2.0, but wanted to be sure. I guess we just need to mention that in the wiki (at the end it said the application should be able to be deployed in a running instance of Geronimo 1.1.1 without issue). I'll let u know if I have more ques

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

...however the migration applications at the time weren't flawless ... C'mon, that's what make them even more interesting ;-) Cheers! Hernan Erik B. Craig wrote: Yes, they would, actually... I have done some amount of testing using the sample migration apps, although it was with the versio

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

Lin, On 9/19/07, Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I started looking at the J2G documentation on the wiki. Two immediate > questions come up and I hope someone can help answering them: > > 1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0 or 2.0.1? The tool supports and was tested ag

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

Yep, I'll move it over. Just been busy with other things... -Donald Jason Warner wrote: Donald, It seems no one is opposed to this idea. We're you going to make this change soon? Thanks, Jason Warner On 9/13/07, *Matt Hogstrom * <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

Re: [RESULTS] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3)

Thanks everyone for reviewing and voting... The vote for the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 plugin has passed with 7 +1 votes. Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 RC3 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.0.1 Server r

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

I started looking at the J2G documentation on the wiki. Two immediate questions come up and I hope someone can help answering them: 1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0 or 2.0.1? 2) Does this tool migrate Jave EE 5 deployment plans? If someone can point me to the samples test

Re: refactoring jaxws support

This sounds a great plan! What you proposed seems a intuitive way to do this... Lin Jarek Gawor wrote: As we talked about making things more modular for 2.1, I'm planning to split the CXF and Axis2 modules into smaller units. The main purpose of the split is to separate the EJB bits from Serv

Re: svn commit: r574694 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: configs/jetty6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/jetty6-deployer/src/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/plan/

On 9/17/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe for now we should remove the filtering from web deployers and > > let each application configure the Spring filtering if necessary. > > Agreed and the idea about using a configuration for spring could be > promising too. Ok. I removed t

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

I thought of verifying whether 2.0.2 will have the fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3380 (Derby embedded database pool created from console doesn't work) but I am getting too late. Thanks, Shiva On 9/14/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All, > I think it's time

On vacation :) until 25th

I won't be having access to email starting tomorrow until next Tuesday. Will respond to any requests once I am back. Cheers, Shiva

Re: [jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-209) Hello World JSP does not open in Eclipse browser when invoked with "run as, run on server" from within Eclipse

Moved to a 2.0.x release, based on Shiva's last comment that WTP 2.0RC2 fixed part of the problem, but plans using 2.0 schema still wouldn't work -Donald Donald Woods (JIRA) wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issu

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3) - RESULTS

Tim, I'd call the RC3 vote complete and time to release the new 2.0.0 plugin. Binding PMC Votes: +1 5 0 none -1 none Other Votes: +1 2 0 none -1 none -Donald Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote o

[BUILD] Trunk: Failed for Revision: 577338

OpenEJB trunk at 0 Geronimo Revision: 577338 built with tests included See the full build-1000.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070919/build-1000.log [WARNING] Unable to get resource 'net.sourceforge.serp:serp:jar:1.11.0' from repository java

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-209) Hello World JSP does not open in Eclipse browser when invoked with "run as, run on server" from within Eclipse

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-209: -- Affects Version/s: (was: 2.1) 2.0 F

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3)

Here's my late +1. -Donald Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 RC3 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.0.1 Server release). The deployable zip file is here: > http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/RC3/geronimo-eclipse-

Re: Should geronimo plans have the "external knobs" in them?

Advanced users always want extra knobs to turn... :-) Seems that we need to update the deployer and Portlet to expose these knobs/configuration options, instead of restricting the functionality of the car-maven-plugin or just to that tool. Maybe the plugin support needs to be moved out of the

Re: refactoring jaxws support

Sounds great! +1 -Donald Jarek Gawor wrote: As we talked about making things more modular for 2.1, I'm planning to split the CXF and Axis2 modules into smaller units. The main purpose of the split is to separate the EJB bits from Servlet bits so that we can create a minimal server with JAX-WS

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

Can we also get an updated TranQL release, to pickup Lin's updated Oracle fix in GERONIMO-2188 and finally release the DB2 vendor files? I'd be glad to help with those, too. -Donald Kevan Miller wrote: All, I think it's time to start rolling out a 2.0.2 release. There have been a number of

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

Agree. There are some recent fixes in txmanager and javamail which we should also try to include. The Genesis project should also be updated, as it sets maven-compiler-plugin to 1.4 for the JDK src and targets. I've got one or two patches that I'd like to get in, which I'm not going to get

refactoring jaxws support

As we talked about making things more modular for 2.1, I'm planning to split the CXF and Axis2 modules into smaller units. The main purpose of the split is to separate the EJB bits from Servlet bits so that we can create a minimal server with JAX-WS support but without installing OpenEJB first. Se

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 577231

2.0.2-SNAPSHOT/jar (top) Cheers Prasad On 19 Sep 2007 10:30:23 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OpenEJB trunk at 0 Geronimo Revision: 577231 built with tests included See the full build-0400.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070919/build-0400

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 577231

og file at > http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070919/build-0400.log > > [INFO] Installing > /home/prasad/geronimo/2.0/configs/webservices-common/target/webservices-common-2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.car > to > /home/prasad/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/configs/webservices-common/2.0

Re: design for plugin portlets

On Sep 18, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Hey Paul, can't see some of the images. Is that a Mac kind of thing !? :-P OpenOffice shows big black blocks. Maybe its just the screenshots. Other than that I really like the proposed updates, will make plugins a lot easier to maintain. I

Should geronimo plans have the "external knobs" in them?

While chatting with vamsi on IRC I realized there is now a big difference between deploying using the car-maven-plugin and deploying using the console or cli deployers. With the car--maven-plugin you get to add stuff to config.xml, artifact_aliease.properties, and config-substitutions.prop

Re: [Discuss] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3)

On 9/19/07, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Shiva, thanks for the information. I'm not sure I feel comfortable > modifying > a user's eclipse.ini file, especially without their knowledge. What I > think we > should do though is include these settings in the release notes for this >

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3456) Make MEJB security configurable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3456: - Attachment: mejb-ejb-2.1-SNAPSHOT.jar configs.patch

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3479) javamail Folder class not including folder name in getURLName() result.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-3479. -- Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 577242. > javamail Folder class not including folder n

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3479) javamail Folder class not including folder name in getURLName() result.

javamail Folder class not including folder name in getURLName() result. --- Key: GERONIMO-3479 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3479 Project: Geronimo Iss

[BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 577231

OpenEJB trunk at 0 Geronimo Revision: 577231 built with tests included See the full build-0400.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070919/build-0400.log [INFO] Installing /home/prasad/geronimo/2.0/configs/webservices-common/target/webservices-common-2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.car

[jira] Reopened: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-131) Initial support - start/stop/deploy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Affects Version/s: 2.0.x > Initial support - start/stop/deploy > --- > > Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-131 >

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215) Does not work right-clik's option "Remove" to remove project from Server ("Servers" View)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528698 ] Tomasz Mazan commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215: --- I would have to create the new one. I can't

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215) Does not work right-clik's option "Remove" to remove project from Server ("Servers" View)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528695 ] Kan Ogawa commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215: Tomasz, In order to reproduce your posted problem

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215) Does not work right-clik's option "Remove" to remove project from Server ("Servers" View)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528679 ] Tomasz Mazan commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215: --- Tim, thanks for your reply. Steps are quite