OpenEJB trunk at 602289
Geronimo Revision: 602335 built with tests included
See the full build-0200.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071208/build-0200.log
61K downloaded
[INFO]
[INFO] Bui
On Dec 6, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Viet Nguyen wrote:
There are goods and bads to both sides to this. If we strictly follow
JSR 77, which means we will use MEJB and are forced to have OpenEJB as
a pre-req, we won't have to worry if our architecture is good or not
(I hope this is right), because we're
On Dec 7, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
2. If yes, then where should we move it to? Should it be in server/
trunk/plugins or should the monitoring plugin be a subproject.
I was thinking of plugins..
I'm not sure it really matters where the code goes in the interim.
Plugi
On Dec 7, 2007, at 6:46 AM, John Sisson wrote:
IMHO, as much as I dislike saying this.. IE support should be
mandatory considering the number of users who use it. The
disadvantages of Dojo 1.0.1 sound pretty minor compared the other
options not supporting browsers.
I think browser su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-94?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GSHELL-94.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Done
> Update LICENSE and NOTICE info for 1.0-alpha-1 release
> -
Update LICENSE and NOTICE info for 1.0-alpha-1 release
--
Key: GSHELL-94
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-94
Project: GShell
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549590
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3605:
---
So far added GShell wrappers for start, stop, restart, and undeploy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549572
]
Erik B. Craig commented on GERONIMO-3682:
-
I'm not sure that I agree with the idea of having the Descripti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549571
]
Erik B. Craig commented on GERONIMO-3681:
-
Anita,
I'm not sure if this is something that will be able to w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor reassigned GERONIMO-3605:
-
Assignee: Jarek Gawor (was: David Jencks)
> GShell-ize deployer commands
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-3687.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Working for me. Let me know if there are any problems...
> classloader de
On Dec 7, 2007, at 2:44 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I was just looking into updating Tomcat for the Geronimo 2.1 release
with an eye toward getting a fix integrated for the Webdav servlet
security issue.
There are 3 possible approaches:
1) Apply the Webdav patch to the 6.0.13 image with the ann
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549551
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3606:
---
Committed revision 602205.
> GShell-ize client
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3606.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Added start-client GShell command for starting application client.
I d
Kevan Miller wrote:
OK. That's good information. But, IMO, that doesn't necessarily mean
we shouldn't move the monitoring plugin out of sandbox. It might mean
that we aren't ready to *release* the monitoring plugin. I don't think
we're having a *release* discussion -- at least we shouldn't be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549534
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-3687:
>From the stacktrace, the deadlock occurs when we're attempting t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viet Hung Nguyen resolved GERONIMO-3554.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
> monitoring plugin: client should u
I was just looking into updating Tomcat for the Geronimo 2.1 release
with an eye toward getting a fix integrated for the Webdav servlet
security issue.
There are 3 possible approaches:
1) Apply the Webdav patch to the 6.0.13 image with the annotation
changes and one other minor change (basi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549532
]
Viet Hung Nguyen commented on GERONIMO-3685:
I think by leaving all of the graph generation up to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549529
]
Erik B. Craig commented on GERONIMO-3554:
-
Patch Committed revision 602191.
Thanks Viet!
> monitoring pl
classloader deadlock during server startup
--
Key: GERONIMO-3687
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3687
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549522
]
Sangjin Lee commented on GERONIMO-3686:
---
I am also adding a few more convenience methods on HttpMessage on h
I had an off-line discussion with Erik about IE support of the various
charting solutions. I *thought* Erik was saying that Dojo 0.4.3
charting works with IE, but just not always as expected. Actually, it
turns out that Dojo 0.4.3 charting does not work with IE at all (similar
to timeplot).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549518
]
Sangjin Lee commented on GERONIMO-3686:
---
Yes, actually in the implementation I've written the session valida
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549510
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-3686:
-
Cool stuff. Yep...FIFO would be the way I would do the queues.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3640.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Eliminate UPCredentialLoginModule
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3652.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Review CallerIdentityPasswordCredentialLoginModule
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3650.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Review ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3629.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Review GeronimoPropertiesFileMappedPasswordCredentialLogin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3626.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Review NamedUPCredentialLoginModule
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3628.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Review GeronimoPasswordCredentialLoginModule
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3625.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Review WrappingLoginModule
> --
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549506
]
Sangjin Lee commented on GERONIMO-3686:
---
Here is a proposal on how the connection reuse may work.
- Once an
AsyncHttpClient does not reuse connection even if connections are persistent
Key: GERONIMO-3686
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3686
Project: Geronimo
On Dec 7, 2007 9:38 PM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2007, at 4:29 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Dec 4, 2007 11:23 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > It is not clear to me if this is part of the earlier code or a
> > separate pro
--- Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The mouse-over feature is cool ... but considering all things listed
> as
> advantages/disadvantages it seems to me that the dojo 0.4.3 comes out
>
> ahead for now. After timeplot has addressed the IE issue and x/y
> axis
> labels (with min/max) then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor reassigned GERONIMO-3606:
-
Assignee: Jarek Gawor (was: David Jencks)
> GShell-ize client
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3685:
-
Description:
. The Monitoring Console (MC) should display TimeStatistics and
On Dec 5, 2007, at 4:29 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On Dec 4, 2007 11:23 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It is not clear to me if this is part of the earlier code or a
separate program. If it is part of the JMX code, then Runtime is from
the local jvm not remote. The
Sounds fine to me.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Dec 6, 2007 9:43 AM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The discussion thread has been out there long enough for comment, and
> those who have responded appear positive about the prospect. I think
> it's time to put this to a vote. The full propo
+1
Rick McGuire wrote:
> The discussion thread has been out there long enough for comment, and
> those who have responded appear positive about the prospect. I think
> it's time to put this to a vote. The full proposal from Matt Hogstrom
> is attached at the end, but the basic proposal we're vot
Monitoring Console should display TimeStatistics and BoundedRangeStatistics
correctly
-
Key: GERONIMO-3685
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3685
Pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-3554:
---
Attachment: geronimo-3554.patch
> monitoring plugin: client should use an ArrayLis
We definitely need such an adapter interface. This will allow us to
not corrupt the target instance, e.g. a minimal server, by installing
openejb.
Thanks
Anita
--- Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I think we are kind of caught in a catch 22 here...
>
> The issue is, the server
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viet Hung Nguyen resolved GERONIMO-3679.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
> Montitoring console should display
On Dec 7, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
--- Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 6, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
--- Viet Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007 11:36 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Eric,
--- Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
>
> >
> > --- Viet Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Dec 5, 2007 11:36 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Eric,
...
I have to agree with John that browser and platform support is the
most important factor. Furthermore, I think the ajax library in
library in Geronimo should continue to be shared across its webapps.
On both of these accounts I would lean heavily towards upgrading the
monitoring client (a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3654.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Completed: At revision: 602089
o Copied o.a.g.s.jaas.Named
On Dec 7, 2007 1:36 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > I wasn't aware the parent pom had been released yesterday:
> >http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/specs/1.3/
> > Did I miss something ?
> I wasn't sure a vote was needed on the pare
I wasn't aware the parent pom had been released yesterday:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/specs/1.3/
Did I miss something ?
Also, the associated tag (indicated in the pom) is missing:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/1_3
On Dec 7, 2007 1:01 PM, Ric
[ ] +1 - Release the jars
[ ] 0 - No opinion
[ ] -1 - Do not release the jars
We're voting on the following which are required for the Geronimo 2.1
release:
1) Release 1.0.0 of the activation 1.1 spec API. The artifact in
question is geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.1. This is the OSGIfie
The prompter should be given the Session so that it can cusomize the prompt
---
Key: GSHELL-93
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-93
Project: GShell
Issue
Erik B. Craig wrote:
All,
Currently the monitoring client is using Dojo 0.4.3 charting, which
does not necessarily behave as expected on Firefox/Safari on a mac, or
on IE6 on Windows.
I consider this to be a shortcoming, and given the new version of Dojo
available (1.0.1), began investigating
+1
John
Rick McGuire wrote:
The discussion thread has been out there long enough for comment, and
those who have responded appear positive about the prospect. I think
it's time to put this to a vote. The full proposal from Matt Hogstrom
is attached at the end, but the basic proposal we're v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549353
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3654:
---
On the second thought, I am planning to skip step 2
+1
++Vamsi
On Dec 6, 2007 8:13 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The discussion thread has been out there long enough for comment, and
> those who have responded appear positive about the prospect. I think
> it's time to put this to a vote. The full proposal from Matt Hogstrom
> is
+1
Jacek
On Dec 6, 2007 3:43 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The discussion thread has been out there long enough for comment, and
> those who have responded appear positive about the prospect. I think
> it's time to put this to a vote. The full proposal from Matt Hogstrom
> is at
Move the XStream specific bits of the Layout in a helper class
--
Key: GSHELL-92
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-92
Project: GShell
Issue Type: Improvement
S
59 matches
Mail list logo