Vote passes with 9 +1s and no other votes.
-David
On Jan 10, 2008, at 2:35 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Discuss thread (for reference):
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Changes since last release:
--
Kay, thanks for your help. I'm sync'ing now to run a clean build and
will see if I can get it happier.
--jason
On Jan 22, 2008, at 11:04 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I updated bunch of things so trunk should work better now but I think
testsuites poms still need some updates.
Jarek
On Jan 22,
My +1
-David
On Jan 10, 2008, at 2:35 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Discuss thread (for reference):
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Changes since last release:
r5856
I updated bunch of things so trunk should work better now but I think
testsuites poms still need some updates.
Jarek
On Jan 22, 2008 5:56 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to help jdillon check the pom cleanup he's been working on
> but I'm having trouble applying the patch
Thanks :-)
--jason
On Jan 22, 2008, at 10:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gawor
Date: Tue Jan 22 22:23:21 2008
New Revision: 614433
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=614433&view=rev
Log:
update groupid
Modified:
geronimo/server/trunk/plugins/welcome/welcome-jetty/pom.xml
g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
YunFeng Ma updated GERONIMO-3772:
-
Attachment: GERONIMO-3772-1.patch
Thanks, Gianny, you are right about the property editor. I'v
Geronimo Revision: 614412 built with tests included
See the full build-2205.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080122/build-2205.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080122
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
Geronimo Revision: 614408 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080122/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080122
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
Aye, thnks for the note David. I hope you and I can get everything
happy and giggling sometime tonight :-)
--jason
On Jan 22, 2008, at 2:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm trying to help jdillon check the pom cleanup he's been working
on but I'm having trouble applying the patches, so I've as
I'm trying to help jdillon check the pom cleanup he's been working on
but I'm having trouble applying the patches, so I've asked him to
commit his work so far. We're not 100% sure if it builds correctly
or not so you might not want to svn up until we are more sure
hopefully very so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-3747:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-3747-step-1.diff.zip
> subprojects should use file system parent poms
The modified patch is there on JIRA. Some follow-up discussions...
I think the current implementation works well, but one thing that's
difficult to do is to collecting timing data. For example, some of the most
important instrumentation data are things like average response time (from
request sta
Thanks! I added the breaks but stayed with .equals() to be on the safe side.
Jarek
On Jan 17, 2008 5:45 AM, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Jarek.
>
> Just few comments about the patch...
> As far as understand each module appears only once in modules array.
> And the objects the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12561481#action_12561481
]
Sangjin Lee commented on GERONIMO-3761:
---
I uploaded a modified patch. This still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3725.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Added the new progress bar to trunk (revision
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangjin Lee updated GERONIMO-3761:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-3761-v2.patch
a modified patch (still not complete)
> Add data collect
I took a look at the patch on GERONIMO-3761, and it looks great. Thanks. I
have modified your patch for several things, though, and I'm nearly ready to
add it to the JIRA report. Comments about the changes...
- I rewrote the EventQueue class to use an Executor. Since the Executor
implementation
downloadStatus page in plugin installer isn't grabbing correct configIds array
--
Key: GERONIMO-3778
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3778
Project: Geronimo
On Jan 22, 2008, at 12:28 PM, AlskiOnTheWeb wrote:
..Well, unless I'm mistaken, the geronimo deployment descriptors
(such as
geronimo-application.xml) have changed.. Since we host a number of
customer
applications, we've spec'd the descriptors from 1.x. That's really the
biggest reason bu
..Well, unless I'm mistaken, the geronimo deployment descriptors (such as
geronimo-application.xml) have changed.. Since we host a number of customer
applications, we've spec'd the descriptors from 1.x. That's really the
biggest reason but we're also to trying to limit any regression testing we
ne
IMO 1.2 is a much better bet than 1.1.1 but since the directory
structure changed you may have to be careful applying your patches.
You haven't really said why you are stuck on a 1.x branch -- I would
seriously consider migrating your changes to the 2.x codebase.
thanks
david jencks
On Ja
...OK. I've downgraded maven to 2.0.7 and am trying the staged build of 1.2
to see where I get to. Is geronimo 1.2 the first version to support Java
1.5?
As a side note, what in the wild wild world of sports made you guys choose
maven? I would think that build repeatability would be a key to sta
Hello again.
I tried to find the issue that kept 1.2 from being released - but the
JIRA must have been closed or moved because there are no blocking issues
on 1.2 (Anyone remember what the blocker was?).
And, right now I am doing a build with just 'mvn' (no other options).
So it looks like D
Hello,
Even though 1.2 was never released - I was using it in production (as a
snapshot) for quite a while. I believe there was only one issue that
held it back from being released (I'll have to go back to check though).
I would suspect that the only thing you would need to get your build to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-3747:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-3747-step-1.diff.zip
> subprojects should use file system parent poms
I wish it were that simple. Unfortunately, I've got to at least try and
apply some patches and configuration from a custom build of 1.0 :-( which
means I need something most likely from the 1.x ancestry. So, if 1.2 is a
no-go, is 1.1.1 a good one? I need a 1.x ancestor that runs under Java 1.5
Note that 1.2 is not released and most likely never will be. You
might consider using 2.0.2 or 2.1-SNAPSHOT.
I'm pretty sure that you need to use maven 2.0.7. I personally have
not tried 2.0.8 but have heard rumors of problems.
Until you get a successful build you may need to run the boot
Hi all,
I first downloaded the source tar and tried to build that. No go as it was
missing some snapshots now. Not knowing the slightest bit about maven (nor
wanting to really), I pulled a source tree of the 1.2 tag. I am using Sun's
JDK 1.5.0_12 with Maven 2.0.8 trying to build source from
https
Console/Plugin Installer - Remote Repo: Trying to download plugin with wrong
naming convention
--
Key: GERONIMO-3777
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-37
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joseph Leong resolved GERONIMO-3775.
Resolution: Fixed
Null check fixed non-cycling issue.
> Plugin installer in admin conso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12561276#action_12561276
]
Joseph Leong commented on GERONIMO-3775:
Revision 614105 now has it cycling thro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12561261#action_12561261
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3747:
This patch appears to work perfectly fo
On Jan 22, 2008 12:44 AM, Jay D. McHugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 - Two weeks sounds good to me.
It's 6 days ago when Kevan put it to discussion so it's really a week
away from that day ;-)
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-3776:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-3776.diff
prospective fix, untested.
> WebResourcePermission.getName
WebResourcePermission.getName() is not always the string URLPatternSpec is
based on, making it impossible to find out the meaning of the permission except
through implies.
-
35 matches
Mail list logo
