[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-1775:
--
Assignee: David Jencks (was: Donald Woods)
> Internationalization of the Admin Cons
On Jan 31, 2008 2:44 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Something we overlooked, previously, is
> geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.1/src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd
>
> The license/notice file for geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec should contain the w3c
> license (http://
How are these files supposed to get into the javadocs / sources jars ?
The copy-legal-files copy the two files to the target/classes/META-INF dir and
the jar plugin grabs them when building the final jar, but I don't
really understand
how they should be grabbed by the source and javadocs plugins ..
Congratulations Viet
On Jan 31, 2008 12:36 AM, Shiva Kumar H R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Congratulations Viet!
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 9:17 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All,
> > I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
> > project. Viet has made a
Congratulations Viet!
On Jan 31, 2008 9:17 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
> I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
> project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo,
> including our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G conversion tool,
Joe,
I think this would be pretty cool. I've often been frustrated trying
to get information out of the classloader/dependency viewer.
I certainly wouldn't rule out including this in our normal assembly.
Will need to see what your solution looks like. You might want to
consider a graphical
Congrats Viet!
Thanks,
Erik B. Craig
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:47 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo,
including our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G c
Congrats Viet!
++Vamsi
On Jan 31, 2008 9:17 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
> I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
> project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo,
> including our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G conversion tool
Congratulations Viet!
Jarek
On Jan 30, 2008 10:47 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
> I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
> project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo,
> including our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G conversion
Congrats, Viet
On Jan 30, 2008 10:55 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Congratulations Viet!
>
> Anita
>
> --- Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All,
> > I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
> > project. Viet has made a number of contrib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12564284#action_12564284
]
YunFeng Ma commented on GERONIMO-3786:
--
Hi David. The gshell command works fine now
Congratulations Viet!
Anita
--- Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
> I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
> project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo,
> including our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G conversion tool,
> as
> w
Congrats Viet! Well deserved.
Joe
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo, including
our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G conversion tool, as well as a
number of bug fixe
All,
I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo,
including our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G conversion tool, as
well as a number of bug fixes, and other helpful contributions.
Let's lay some props
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12564283#action_12564283
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-3783:
Right. In src/conf/MessageReceiversJmsP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12564282#action_12564282
]
YunFeng Ma commented on GERONIMO-1775:
--
Sorry for the late reply. I've tried the I1
:-(
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:44:12
To:Geronimo Dev
Subject: problem with spec releases
Guillaume,
I'm extremely sorry to say that the javadoc and sources jars all seem to be
missing the required license and notice f
Guillaume,
I'm extremely sorry to say that the javadoc and sources jars all seem
to be missing the required license and notice files.
Not sure what might have changed, build-wise. The previous versions
contain them -- geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1-javadoc.jar and
geronimo-annotation_1.0
I was going to test out these specs in Geronimo prior to voting but I
couldn't find a reference to this spec in G. It looks like we use
axis2-saaj-api for this currently. Is the plan to also switch Geronimo
over to this new spec jar?
Joe
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Well, actually, the subject
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon closed GSHELL-13.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Yay... this is a good first step. I think we might want to decide on some
naming thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12564254#action_12564254
]
jdillon edited comment on GSHELL-13 at 1/30/08 5:38 PM:
-
Yup, yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12564257#action_12564257
]
Jason Dillon commented on GSHELL-13:
A minor nit... please make sure your patches have t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12564254#action_12564254
]
Jason Dillon commented on GSHELL-13:
Yup, you can put any GShell commands into:
* {{~/
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:48:05
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release EJB 3.0 spec, v 1.0.1
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:33 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of EJB 3.0 spec for v
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:48:15
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release JAXRPC 1.1 spec, v 2.0
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JAXRPC 1.1 spec fo
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:48:33
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release JAXR 1.0 spec, v 2.0
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JAXR 1.0 spec for vo
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:50:24
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release JACC 1.1 spec, v 1.0.1
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:12 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JACC 1.1 spec for
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:50:31
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release JPA 3.0 spec, v 1.1.1
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JPA 3.0 spec for vo
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:50:47
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release JMS 1.1 spec, v 1.1.1
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JMS 1.1 spec for vo
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:51:04
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release EL 1.0 spec, v 1.0.1
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of EL 1.0 spec for vote
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:49:04
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release SAAJ 1.3 spec, v 1.0
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:37 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JAAS 1.3 spec for vo
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:49:18
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release JTA 1.1 spec, v 1.1.1
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:56 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JTA 1.1 spec for vo
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:49:33
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release interceptor 3.0 spec, v 1.0.1
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of Interceptor
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:49:39
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Connector 1.5 spec, v 2.0
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:06 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of J2EE Connector
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:49:51
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release annotation 1.0 spec, v 1.1.1
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of annotations
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:50:04
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release JSP 2.1 spec, v 1.0.1
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JSP 2.1 spec for vo
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:50:13
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release ws-metadata 2.0 spec, 1.1.2
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of ws-metadata 2
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:49:59
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release J2EE Management 1.1 spec, v 1.0.1
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:45 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of J2EE Ma
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of EL 1.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/~gnode
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JMS 1.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/~gno
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JPA 3.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/~gno
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:12 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JACC 1.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/~g
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of ws-metadata 2.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/
Repo
http://people
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JSP 2.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/~gno
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:45 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of J2EE Management 1.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/
Repo
http
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of annotations 1.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1
Repo
http://people.a
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:06 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of J2EE Connector 1.5 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0/
Repo
http://p
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of Interceptor 3.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/
Repo
http://people
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:56 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JTA 1.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/~gno
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:37 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JAAS 1.3 spec for vote.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-
jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/
Please review and v
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JAXR 1.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/~gno
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JAXRPC 1.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:33 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of EJB 3.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/~gn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12564206#action_12564206
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3787:
I've committed, in rev 616937, a fix th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-3787:
---
Attachment: snoop.war
I've attached a simple war that when deployed demonstrates the problem. No
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12564184#action_12564184
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3783:
Kevan and I did some experiments and fo
Hi Erik,
Originally I'm just going off the idea of it being a neat plugin that the
community or anyone can use. Just a sort of tool. I guess there is no
telling how novel others will find this piece, but it's a starting point and
hopefully a useful contribution at that. But to answer you origin
Aighty, sounds good to me :-)
--jason
On Jan 30, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
So, what is the new timeframe to TCK and release this puppy?
Well, my two week period for reviewing and fixing problems ends
today. Things are looking
On Jan 30, 2008 10:27 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've made a lot of progress on our 2.1 release, in the past two
> weeks. Time to create our release branch and start cranking out the
> release.
>
> I'm going to create a release branch on Friday afternoon (EST).
Hooray! Long aw
Joe,
If this is something that is intended for eventual inclusion in a full
assembly/replacing or upgrading the classloader and dependency
viewers, then you should probably be looking into using dojo 1.0.2,
especially giving that the current stuff is already written to use
dojo 0.4.3, and
All,
We've made a lot of progress on our 2.1 release, in the past two
weeks. Time to create our release branch and start cranking out the
release.
I'm going to create a release branch on Friday afternoon (EST).
I'd like to have everyone give this consideration before committing
new code.
Hi All,
So i was thinking about creating a neat new little plugin piece that would
help represent the data in the ClassLoader Viewer and Dependency Viewer
better visually. The purpose of this is to represent the current
data/hierarchy in a more complete and graphical format..ultimately hoping
tha
On Jan 30, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
So, what is the new timeframe to TCK and release this puppy?
Well, my two week period for reviewing and fixing problems ends today.
Things are looking pretty good, IMO.
I think we branch on Friday and start turning the screws.
--kevan
I guess that Kevan needs to chime in on that ... but I think Friday is
still reasonable to branch and start the release work if we can get the
critical issues resolved by then.
I've been running TCK continuously and fixing and/or pointing things out
when I notice problems. We're generally at
BTW when we branch for 2.1 I plan to remove the jaspi dependent code
and remove the jaspi spec dependency.
meanwhile someone :-) should make sure the in-vote specs pass the tck.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 30, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
So, what is the new timeframe to TCK and rele
I have an idea that I'd like to try...
I think perhaps the ResourceRefBuilder can get an additional
CorbaEnvironment that it can merge in only if there is a resource-ref
to an ORB. Then web apps that don't use the orb should be ok.
Any ideas how to test this?
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon reassigned GSHELL-13:
--
Assignee: Jason Dillon (was: Jason Warner)
> Implement command search path
> --
I will take a peek.
--jason
On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Jason (or other folks working on GShell),
I was wondering if you can help me with hooking up the wsgen/wsimport
gshell command to javaee assemblies. The commands are already
implemented (https://issues.apache.org/jir
So, what is the new timeframe to TCK and release this puppy?
--jason
On Jan 29, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
This note is a bit overdue (it's been a distracting start to the
New Year for me). Time, IMO, for us to get focused on our 2.1
release.
As David Jenc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12564161#action_12564161
]
Joseph Leong commented on GERONIMO-2480:
I dont' believe that this specific issu
Joe Bohn wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Dave,
I think this change (along with the corresponding openejb change) is
causing a build failure in trunk when building geronimo using a
private build of openejb. I can build if we don't exclude javaee-api
and pick up the classes transitively. However, yo
Joe Bohn wrote:
Dave,
I think this change (along with the corresponding openejb change) is
causing a build failure in trunk when building geronimo using a private
build of openejb. I can build if we don't exclude javaee-api and pick
up the classes transitively. However, you specifically ad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3757.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
Completed. Fixed in
Dave,
I think this change (along with the corresponding openejb change) is
causing a build failure in trunk when building geronimo using a private
build of openejb. I can build if we don't exclude javaee-api and pick
up the classes transitively. However, you specifically added the
exclusio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3583.
---
Resolution: Fixed
GERONIMO-3620 took care of the url normalization and I just committed on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor reassigned GERONIMO-3583:
-
Assignee: Jarek Gawor (was: Erik B. Craig)
> Deployer.jar gets null pointer exception
On Jan 29, 2008 7:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JAXR 1.0 spec for vote.
> The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
> Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0/
> Repo
>http://pe
On Jan 29, 2008 7:37 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JAAS 1.3 spec for vote.
> Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/
> Repo
>http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/
>
> P
On Jan 29, 2008 7:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JAXRPC 1.1 spec for vote.
> The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
> Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0/
> Repo
>http:
On Jan 29, 2008 7:56 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JTA 1.1 spec for vote.
> The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
> Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/
> Repo
>http://pe
On Jan 29, 2008 8:06 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of J2EE Connector 1.5 spec for vote.
> The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
> Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0/
>
On Jan 29, 2008 8:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of Interceptor 3.0 spec for vote.
> The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
> Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/
> Rep
On Jan 29, 2008 8:19 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of annotations 1.0 spec for vote.
> The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
> Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1
> Repo
On Jan 29, 2008 8:33 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of EJB 3.0 spec for vote.
> The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
> Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/
> Repo
>http://pe
On Jan 29, 2008 8:45 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of J2EE Management 1.1 spec for vote.
> The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
> Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1
On Jan 29, 2008 9:12 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JACC 1.1 spec for vote.
> The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
> Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/
> Repo
>http://
On Jan 29, 2008 9:18 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JPA 3.0 spec for vote.
> The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
> Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/
> Repo
>http://pe
On Jan 30, 2008 9:18 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw, here's my +1
>
>
> On Jan 29, 2008 5:24 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've uploaded a release of JSP 2.1 spec for vote.
> > The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
> > Tag:
> >
> >
On Jan 29, 2008 9:36 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of ws-metadata 2.0 spec for vote.
> The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
> Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/
> Rep
Jason (or other folks working on GShell),
I was wondering if you can help me with hooking up the wsgen/wsimport
gshell command to javaee assemblies. The commands are already
implemented (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3665) but
they are not registered in the javaee assembly. Is the
CONSORCIO REYES MORA-CORONA EXPERTOS TRIBUTARISTAS, S.C. Y
GRUPO OROZCO-FELGUERES S.C.
SE CONGRATULAN EN INVITARLO A NUESTRO MAGNO EVENTO FISCAL DENOMINADO:
“TRATAMIENTO FISCAL DE LAS PERSONAS MORALES CON FINES NO LUCRATIVOS”
Temas por abordar:
1. Personas Morales no c
Kevan,
Thanks for taking the time to respond. More inline ...
On Jan 30, 2008 1:08 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>
> So, as we discussed the last time, the community members that have been
> active in this area are Jeff Genender, Sangjin Lee, and Rick McGuire. You
> already kn
Actually I already made a Mina 2.x version that is in the G sandbox ;-)
Jeff
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:28 PM, Mike Heath wrote:
Alex Karasulu wrote:
Hi,
Please excuse the cross post but it's quite necessary. Furthermore
people
should not feel like they cannot cross post re
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JAXR 1.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0/
Repo
http://people
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:37 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JAAS 1.3 spec for vote.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-
jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/
Ple
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JAXRPC 1.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0/
Repo
http://pe
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:56 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JTA 1.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/
Repo
http://people
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:06 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of J2EE Connector 1.5 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0/
R
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of Interceptor 3.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/
Repo
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of annotations 1.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1
Repo
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
