Re: Geronimo 2.1 working on Harmony

On Feb 22, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:25 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I guess the gshell launcher should figure this stuff out.It seems like this is moving us from configuration back towards code which I'm not too thrilled

Re: Geronimo 2.1 working on Harmony

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:25 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess the gshell launcher should figure this stuff out.It seems > like this is moving us from configuration back towards code which I'm > not too thrilled about. At least the script can be in groovy. Can you ela

Re: Geronimo v2.1 documentation update

On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Need update" would be something like moved the content from prev release > but not yet finished. Or worked on some brand new content but still need to > update it to reflect the latest changes on the server ( think of it

Re: Geronimo 2.1 working on Harmony

On Feb 22, 2008, at 7:20 PM, Vasily Zakharov wrote: Sounds the best. :) Well, detecting the Harmony VM is not a problem, the question is where and at which stage that detection should take place and how should it be reflected in further configuration process. I guess the gshell launcher sho

Re: Geronimo 2.1 working on Harmony

Sounds the best. :) Well, detecting the Harmony VM is not a problem, the question is where and at which stage that detection should take place and how should it be reflected in further configuration process. By the way, NamingProperties/namingFactoryUrlPkgs is also pretty clear JDK-dependent thin

[BUILD] 2.2: Failed for Revision: 630375

Geronimo Revision: 630375 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080222/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080222/unit-test-reports [INFO

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3871) maven archetypes for modules and assemblies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12571661#action_12571661 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3871: rev 630365 first draft of module (plugi

Re: Geronimo Tomcat 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT: SESSIONS.ser written to workDir

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we want to build a vibrant user community, we need to support the > prior major release (2.0) until our next major release (2.2) comes out. A vibrant community has nothing to do with the versions we support. If we pro

Re: Geronimo 2.1 working on Harmony

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Vasily Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suppose we could have, say, two security configuration, like > "jks-default" and "bks-default" and have the name of the one to start > with in config-substitutions, right? Or better yet - make it enabled automatica

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo v2.1 documentation - Content

How about keeping it in tools and then have a sections under Migration for - Geronimo 1.1.1 to 2.1 Geronimo 2.0 to 2.0 JBoss to Geronimo and in the JBoss to Geronimo section, briefly mention the J2G tool and include a pointer to its docs Just a thought. -Donald Jason Warner wrote:

Re: Geronimo 2.1 working on Harmony

Thanks! Yes, maybe it worth creating a config-substitutions entries for those parameters. And one of the reasons for that is simplifying the version transition - till now, I had to re-investigate the necessary config changes for each new Geronimo version. With the variables, the config evolution c

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo v2.1 documentation - Content

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > J2G ended up under tooling because that's how we have it organized on the > web site > Development tools >+ Geronimo Eclipse Plugin >+ JBoss to Geronimo Migration Tool (J2G) > > Just trying

Re: Geronimo 2.1 working on Harmony

Not at once. :) Vasily On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:56 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool. Congrats Vasily! > > Any plans for Mac OS X support, in Harmony? :-) > > --kevan > > > On Feb 22, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Vasily Zakharov wrote: > Hi, all, > > Here I'm reporting that Geronimo v2.1

[BUILD] 2.2: Failed for Revision: 630309

Geronimo Revision: 630309 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080222/build-1500.log Download the binaries from http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080222 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO

Re: Geronimo 2.1 working on Harmony

This is great news!! I glanced at the wiki page. I wonder if we should put most or all of the configuration tweaks into variables in the config- substitutions.properties file. The server-security-config is really just a dumb sample of how to configure security, so it might be reasonable t

Re: Geronimo 2.1 working on Harmony

Cool. Congrats Vasily! Any plans for Mac OS X support, in Harmony? :-) --kevan On Feb 22, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Vasily Zakharov wrote: Hi, all, Here I'm reporting that Geronimo v2.1 runs on Apache Harmony pretty well. See [1] for the detailed report. Shortly speaking, one have to tweak the c

[BUILD] 2.1: Failed for Revision: 630284

Geronimo Revision: 630284 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080222/build-1400.log Download the binaries from http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080222 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO

Geronimo 2.1 working on Harmony

Hi, all, Here I'm reporting that Geronimo v2.1 runs on Apache Harmony pretty well. See [1] for the detailed report. Shortly speaking, one have to tweak the config in three places, and tweak the startup a bit - and up it goes. I was able to browse the console freely and pretty fast, and deployed S

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3873) Console Keystore Configuration links contain partial HTML tags

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3873. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1) Patch committed to trunk (revision

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3873) Console Keystore Configuration links contain partial HTML tags

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor reassigned GERONIMO-3873: - Assignee: Jarek Gawor > Console Keystore Configuration links contain partial HTML tags

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3840) Server may try to start modules in an order that won't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3840. -- Resolution: Fixed Ported to branches/2.1 in rev 630315, along with GERONIMO-3841 > Server m

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3841) Need a way to load config.xml customizations without a whole config.xml file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3841. -- Resolution: Fixed Ported to branches/2.1 in rev 630315, along with GERONIMO-3840 > Need a w

Re: Geronimo v2.1 documentation update

Jason Warner wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Jason Warner wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Geronimo v2.1 documentation update

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jason Warner wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > > "Need update" would be something like moved the content from prev > >

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3866) Export Plugin from web console contains empty, non-editiable 'Unique ID" field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12571575#action_12571575 ] Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3866: Hold off on this patch until I figure out why i

Re: [Fwd: Re: NPE exporting a plugin ... null returned from getPluginMetadata()]

David, Hold off on the patch for now. I was cleaning things up a bit right before I created the patch and now when I try to build assemblies it is spewing NPEs like they are going out of style. Let me figure out what is going on. Joe Joe Bohn wrote: Joe Bohn wrote: Joe Bohn wrote: for

Re: Geronimo v2.1 documentation update

Jason Warner wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: "Need update" would be something like moved the content from prev release but not yet finished. Or worked on some brand new content but still need to update

Re: [Fwd: Re: NPE exporting a plugin ... null returned from getPluginMetadata()]

Joe Bohn wrote: Joe Bohn wrote: forwarding messages to dev list for further discussion. Original Message Subject: Re: NPE exporting a plugin ... null returned from getPluginMetadata() Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:42:36 -0800 (PST) From: David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Joe

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3866) Export Plugin from web console contains empty, non-editiable 'Unique ID" field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-3866: --- Attachment: GERONIMO-3866.patch Here is a possible patch for this issue. I know it is not optimal

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3873) Console Keystore Configuration links contain partial HTML tags

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Becker updated GERONIMO-3873: - Attachment: geronimo-3873.patch Patch applies to trunk and 2.1.1 and 2.1 branches > Console K

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3873) Console Keystore Configuration links contain partial HTML tags

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Becker updated GERONIMO-3873: - Attachment: Back to keystore garbage.jpg > Console Keystore Configuration links contain partia

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3873) Console Keystore Configuration links contain partial HTML tags

Console Keystore Configuration links contain partial HTML tags -- Key: GERONIMO-3873 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3873 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3866) Export Plugin from web console contains empty, non-editiable 'Unique ID" field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12571569#action_12571569 ] Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3866: Here is some detail on the problem: This code

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3866) Export Plugin from web console contains empty, non-editiable 'Unique ID" field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12571568#action_12571568 ] Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3866: Additional information: A NPE exception is als

Re: Geronimo v2.1 documentation update

Guys, that TOC is not casted in stone. That was my way to put some ideas together for topics to cover. IIRC, there have been discussion threads started back in October/November last year to gather input around 2.1 documentation Back to the tables, I rather have more column there than I actuall

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3867) Export Plugin in Web Console results in NullPointerException if no component is selected

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-3867: --- Description: When attempting to export a component as a plugin in the web console a NPE is thrown

Re: Geronimo v2.1 documentation update

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Need update" would be something like moved the content from prev release > but not yet finished. Or worked on some brand new content but still need to > update it to reflect the latest changes on the server ( think of it

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo v2.1 documentation - Content

Jason Warner wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I think J2G should stay listed as a "Tool". Anything that requires a developer tool like Eclipse in-order to use it, should be called a tool. I half agree with w

Re: Geronimo v2.1 documentation update

"Need update" would be something like moved the content from prev release but not yet finished. Or worked on some brand new content but still need to update it to reflect the latest changes on the server ( think of it as if you started before Geronimo was released, then you would have a bunch of SN

Re: Geronimo v2.1 documentation update

I'm glad the question has been brought up, i was wondering myself... Ditto above Also, for the sections that are in 2.0 users that are not on 2.1 users - does this mean we have decided to not transfer these sections over? (i.e. some of the sample applications) or is it because some of the document

Re: Geronimo v2.1 documentation update

Jason Warner wrote: What's the "need update" column for on the 2.0 Update status page? Is that to mark a page that is moved over but still needs someone who knows what the article is talking about to update it based on 2.1? Good question. I've been treating it as "needs rework to move to 2.1"

Re: Geronimo Tomcat 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT: SESSIONS.ser written to workDir

Unfortunately, we keep changing the artifact names and Plugin architecture/schema in every major release, so users who have developed real JavaEE apps on 2.0 (more than just simple servlet/jsp web apps) will more than likely have some work and testing before they can move to 2.1. If we want t

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo v2.1 documentation - Content

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think J2G should stay listed as a "Tool". Anything that requires a > developer tool like Eclipse in-order to use it, should be called a tool. > I half agree with what you're saying. Part of me does want J2G to be in t

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo v2.1 documentation - Content

I think J2G should stay listed as a "Tool". Anything that requires a developer tool like Eclipse in-order to use it, should be called a tool. I always view a "Migration" section in a product's docs as how to migrate from prior releases, whereas migrating from other vendors products is complic

Re: Geronimo v2.1 documentation update

Hernan, What's the "need update" column for on the 2.0 Update status page? Is that to mark a page that is moved over but still needs someone who knows what the article is talking about to update it based on 2.1? On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All

[jira] Reopened: (GERONIMO-3841) Need a way to load config.xml customizations without a whole config.xml file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks reopened GERONIMO-3841: need to apply to 2.1.x branch > Need a way to load config.xml customizations without a whol

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3841) Need a way to load config.xml customizations without a whole config.xml file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-3841: --- Fix Version/s: 2.1.1 > Need a way to load config.xml customizations without a whole config

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3869) geronimo/stop-server doesn't use connection established by deploy/connect in gshell

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3869: --- Fix Version/s: 2.1.1 also needs to be fixed in 2.1.1 > geronimo/stop-server doesn't use c

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo v2.1 documentation - Content

Jason Warner wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Jason Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I was looking at transferring the J2G documentation over from 2.0 to 2.1 and I noticed that j2g is listed under tools rather than a migration heading. Are we

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo v2.1 documentation - Content

J2G ended up under tooling because that's how we have it organized on the web site Development tools + Geronimo Eclipse Plugin + JBoss to Geronimo Migration Tool (J2G) Just trying to remain consistent. We can definitively create a Migration section, move j2g there

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo v2.1 documentation - Content

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Jason Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was looking at transferring the J2G documentation over from 2.0 to 2.1and I > noticed that j2g is listed under tools rather than a migration > heading. Are we not going to have a Migration heading? I'd prefer to put >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo v2.1 documentation - Content

I was looking at transferring the J2G documentation over from 2.0 to 2.1 and I noticed that j2g is listed under tools rather than a migration heading. Are we not going to have a Migration heading? I'd prefer to put the tool under something more descriptive so that it really jumps out to a user. Al

[jira] Commented: (GSHELL-102) Update MINA to latest (ATM thats 1.1.6)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12571401#action_12571401 ] Rick McGuire commented on GSHELL-102: - I don't believe 2.0 is in stable enough shape ye

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3872) proxy connect for https tunneling times out

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-3872. Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 630189. Mina 1.1.5 version Committed revision 630

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3780) MDB unable to access JNDI in ejbPostCreate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manu T George updated GERONIMO-3780: Attachment: G3780-r628632.patch Changing to synchronized(deploymentInfo){

[jira] Created: (GSHELL-102) Update MINA to latest (ATM thats 1.1.6)

Update MINA to latest (ATM thats 1.1.6) --- Key: GSHELL-102 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-102 Project: GShell Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public (Regular issues)

Re: How to enable {deck} in Geronimo Wiki

I think its possible, we just have to figure out what javascript muck needs to be included and then hardcode that into the template... All such a pita though... I thought the new version of Confluence had something called "Massive" would make it perform better. AE is nice, but only cause w

Re: Questions about using Gshell on a remote server instance

We might be able to open a port on localhost during startup, which would only be used to provide status (like starting, started, shutting down). Then we wouldn't need to make a JMX connection to the server at all. Though if possible, a special anonymous system account with limited provile

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3868) Plugin Installer Portlet Over Cluttered

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12571302#action_12571302 ] Joseph Leong commented on GERONIMO-3868: Thanks Paul! I was looking for a good p