Geronimo Revision: 707240 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081022/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081022/unit-test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12642017#action_12642017
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4375:
This is an xbean-naming problem, see XB
Donald,
I am using Ubuntu Linux with Sun 1.5.0_15 and Maven 2.0.9.
I will try using Maven 2.0.7.
Thanks,
Jay
Donald Woods wrote:
> Which OS, JDK and Maven?
>
> The 2.0 builds are using Maven 2.0.7 and Sun 1.5.0_16 on a Linux system.
>
> It's been a week or so since I rebuilt branches/2.0, bu
Which OS, JDK and Maven?
The 2.0 builds are using Maven 2.0.7 and Sun 1.5.0_16 on a Linux system.
It's been a week or so since I rebuilt branches/2.0, but the last I
tried it worked for me with a clean repo on openSUSE 11.0 and MacOSX.
-Donald
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hello all,
I know that
Yep, that's on my list of items to do before moving on.
Donald Woods (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641951#action_12641951 ]
Donald Woods commented on GERONI
Hello all,
I know that we have the automated build going on. And I have been
getting the emails daily saying that the build was successful for 2.0.3.
But, when I started with a fresh checkout and an empty repo - I was
unable to build.
Are there changes that were made on the automated build mach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641951#action_12641951
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524:
---
Can you add someth
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-526:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.2.0
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
> need ability to perform Custom Server Assembly
st.v21.ui plugin.xml needs internationalization
---
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-526
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-526
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Bug
Co
need testcase for create a custom server assembly
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-525
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-525
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
B.J. Reed resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524.
Resolution: Fixed
Code added in revisions 707160 for 2.1.4 and 707162 for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed XBEAN-114.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.5
rev 707161.
> Generify xbean-naming
> -
Generify xbean-naming
-
Key: XBEAN-114
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-114
Project: XBean
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: naming
Affects Versions: 3.4.3
Reporter: David Jenck
On Oct 22, 2008, at 6:56 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Has anyone heard if JPA 2.0 will be part of JEE6?
Yes, it will.
If so, is Apache OpenJPA working on it?
It's definitely on their radar. Not sure if they've started.
-David
need ability to perform Custom Server Assembly
--
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: New Feature
On Oct 22, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
OK, looks like we're making good progress towards a 2.2 release.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.2+Release+Roadmap
Is everyone still thinking we can get 2.2 out this year (say
branching on 11/21 with a mid-Decem
rebind of "auto-bound" stuff in jca: context doesn't work
-
Key: GERONIMO-4375
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4375
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security
+1
Jay
Joe Bohn wrote:
> This is a vote for Genesis 1.5.
>
> Take 3:
> In addition to take 1 & take 2 this includes a more appropriate javadoc
> max memory setting.
>
> Take 2:
> Same as take 1 except for replacing the hard-coded dependency on
> geronimo-skin from 1.5-SNAPSHOT with 1.5 (this re
bad error message for errors in ra.xml
--
Key: GERONIMO-4374
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4374
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Kay, just wanted to make sure you checked the svn repo logs and not
what I posted, cause I was *ucking guessing what the rev was ;-)
ViewVC sucks ass, I can't really make much use of it its soo feature
lacking and buggy. Really wish we had Fisheye for the entire repo.
But, hopefully you d
>From what I saw, this was the latest revision before build-support was
deleted. I thought that would be a good place to start.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> How did you decide on this revision?
>
> --jason
>
>
>
> On Oct 22, 2008, at 2:15 AM, [EMAIL
How did you decide on this revision?
--jason
On Oct 22, 2008, at 2:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jawarner
Date: Tue Oct 21 12:15:31 2008
New Revision: 706725
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=706725&view=rev
Log:
Resurrecting the build-support stuff in an attempt to get some
I was waiting for take 4, but its been a wee bit, so here is my +1
--jason
On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:01 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
This is a vote for Genesis 1.5.
Take 3:
In addition to take 1 & take 2 this includes a more appropriate
javadoc max memory setting.
Take 2:
Same as take 1 except for r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4299.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Session invalidation problem - WADI Tomcat Clustering
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4299:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.2
2.1.3
Fix Version/s: 2.2
Agree +1000.
Should this be considered the plan for 2.2?
-Donald
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Here are my thoughts on the switch to GShell:
-1 for geronimo.sh, and client.sh - the GShell alternatives start two
separate java processes: one for GShell env. and one for the server or
client container. Th
OK, looks like we're making good progress towards a 2.2 release.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.2+Release+Roadmap
Is everyone still thinking we can get 2.2 out this year (say branching
on 11/21 with a mid-December release target)?
Seems that the major items left
Has anyone heard if JPA 2.0 will be part of JEE6?
http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/xwiki/bin/view/Article/TestingJPA
If so, is Apache OpenJPA working on it?
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
FYI, here's an update on information on the expected Java EE 6 schedule
-- http://weblogs.java.net/bl
Coolio :-)
--jason
On Oct 22, 2008, at 7:11 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
OK, I just created the page and did an export ... it might take an
hour or so for it to become live.
Joe
Jason Dillon wrote:
I don't think it implies that really... just only shows what
javadocs we do have, though we shoul
OK, I just created the page and did an export ... it might take an hour
or so for it to become live.
Joe
Jason Dillon wrote:
I don't think it implies that really... just only shows what javadocs we
do have, though we should probably keep one copy (latest) for each major
release.
--jason
I don't think it implies that really... just only shows what javadocs
we do have, though we should probably keep one copy (latest) for each
major release.
--jason
On Oct 22, 2008, at 6:51 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Yes, I was thinking the same thing. I just hadn't gotten to it yet
and I was al
Yes, I was thinking the same thing. I just hadn't gotten to it yet and
I was also a little hesitant because that implies that we will have the
javadoc for all releases. At the moment we only have 2.0.1 and 2.1.3.
Joe
Jason Dillon wrote:
I suggest we create an intermediate page in the wiki t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-4372.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 707037.
Thanks for reporting this!
> Wrong DEFAULT_IM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire reassigned GERONIMO-4372:
--
Assignee: Rick McGuire
> Wrong DEFAULT_IMAP_PORT in the Geronimo JavaMail 1.4 provid
application.xml in EJB META-INF breaks deployment
--
Key: GERONIMO-4373
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4373
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public
Geronimo Revision: 706876 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081022/build-0300.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081022
[INFO] BUILD
37 matches
Mail list logo
