[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4682) Unique snapshots does not work

Unique snapshots does not work -- Key: GERONIMO-4682 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4682 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components:

Re: Geronimo EJB security

Hi Ivan, On Jun 9, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Ivan wrote: Thanks, David, I have changed some codes about EJB security, for it made some cases failed. Currently, I use whether securiy segment exists in the deployment plan to decide that , JACC Manager is or not need to be created. I think that's

Re: Geronimo EJB security

I am not sure if I express myself clearly in the last email. For example, in the ejb-jar.xml file, no method permission is defined, only some run as configuration, and in the geronimo's plan, a securiy configuration is defined. Before the changes I did, the builder checks whether there are

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-578) Integrate server adapter 1.1 in GEP 2.2

Integrate server adapter 1.1 in GEP 2.2 --- Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-578 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-578 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: New Feature

Re: svn commit: r776749 - /geronimo/sandbox/blueprint/README

I think we should even upgrade to the latest snapshot of felix. The reason is that the blueprint API depends on OSGi Core 4.2 for the ServiceException. Currently, I have hacked the api to remove this dependency, but we'll have to switch to the correct api at some point anyway. On Wed, May 20,

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4661) Meaningless message displays while Geronimo ear plan contains modules that aren't in the ear

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] viola.lu updated GERONIMO-4661: --- Attachment: GERONIMO-4661.patch With this patch, Message like below will be output on admin

Re: svn commit: r776749 - /geronimo/sandbox/blueprint/README

Sounds good. I was just using the latest released version to test with at the time. -Donald Guillaume Nodet wrote: I think we should even upgrade to the latest snapshot of felix. The reason is that the blueprint API depends on OSGi Core 4.2 for the ServiceException. Currently, I have

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-578) Integrate server adapter 1.1 in GEP 2.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718059#action_12718059 ] Donald Woods commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-578: --- Why? We decided

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-283) Refactoring a Dynamic Web Project's name doesn't refactor it's artifact id context root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718076#action_12718076 ] Delos Dai commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-283: I think it's not right

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4683) Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely correctly

Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely correctly Key: GERONIMO-4683 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4683 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4533) Fix This is ridiculous error messages on command execution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718109#action_12718109 ] Vladimir Ivanov commented on GERONIMO-4533: --- Thanks for quick fix and

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4682) Unique snapshots does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718115#action_12718115 ] Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4682: Why do you need to rebuild the server

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4682) Unique snapshots does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718117#action_12718117 ] Trygve Hardersen commented on GERONIMO-4682: I first posted this to the

[Fwd: ActiveMQ OSGi Integration]

http://activemq.apache.org/osgi-integration.html Original Message Subject: OSGi Integration Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:31:38 +0200 From: Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net Reply-To: d...@activemq.apache.org To: d...@activemq.apache.org, us...@activemq.apache.org Hi all, just

jta spec bundle issue in felix

Hey all, I'm experimenting with JPA (OpenJPA specifically) in osgi environment and I ran into an interesting issue with the transaction API. The root of the problem is that the JDK provides a *subset* of the javax.transaction classes that the JTA specification defines. And that creates problems

Re: jta spec bundle issue in felix

Interesting prob... I wonder if you add the split-package (see http://www.aqute.biz/Code/Bnd) when you export the jta packages would solve the prob for you. This is what I have been using but I only tried Equinox so far. Export-Package = \

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4649) WebServiceContext is null by use of axis and BASIC authentication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-4649. --- Resolution: Cannot Reproduce WebServiceContext is null by use of axis and BASIC

Re: jta spec bundle issue in felix

First of all I think we should lean on felix to provide a 1.0 package version for their tx classes. Second without the split-bundle lin suggests wont' there be this problem anyway since the system bundle will have used up the packages and ours will be ignored? thanks david jencks On Jun

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4679) many [ERROR] The protocol for the JAR file's URL is not supported in the build log when building geronimo on windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718200#action_12718200 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4679: Since you have a windows system to

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4683) Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718204#action_12718204 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4683: IIUC IllegalStateException is an

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4682) Unique snapshots does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718206#action_12718206 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4682: donald we are now using the nexus

Unsubscribe

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-283) Refactoring a Dynamic Web Project's name doesn't refactor it's artifact id context root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718308#action_12718308 ] Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-283: -- Or how about

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-283) Refactoring a Dynamic Web Project's name doesn't refactor it's artifact id context root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shiva Kumar H R reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-283: Assignee: (was: Shiva Kumar H R) Refactoring a