Geronimo Revision: 835759 built with tests included
See the full build-0200.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20091113/build-0200.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20091113/unit-test-reports
Geronimo Revision: 835703 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091112/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091112/unit-test
Geronimo Revision: 835519 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091112/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091112/unit-test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777012#action_12777012
]
Ashish Jain commented on GERONIMO-4865:
---
This will work with class found in IBM JD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Jain updated GERONIMO-4865:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: Wish List)
2.2
2.1.5
> Login
Geronimo Revision: 835384 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091112/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091112/unit-test
Hi,
In the OSGI world, it uses User Admin service for authentication and
authorization. I am thinking what we could do between User Admin Service and
Geronimo 3.0.
One side, is Geronimo possible to provide any User Admin service
implementation ? From my view, it is not. It seems that it is
Hi,
It has been a long time. After some investigation, I think the way Quintin
suggested should work, but I wonder how we are gona get another domain for
the old docs? To my knowledge, we need to pay for domains, right? I am
definitely no expert on this.
However, as I am a technical writer dealin
2009/11/12 Guillaume Nodet
> I think we should keep this mbean a bit more coarse grained as done
> with other services in RFC 139.
> So instead of having something like:
> CompositeData getLastEvent(long containerServiceId);
> I think we should have:
> TabularData getLastEvents();
>
> A
I think we should keep this mbean a bit more coarse grained as done
with other services in RFC 139.
So instead of having something like:
CompositeData getLastEvent(long containerServiceId);
I think we should have:
TabularData getLastEvents();
Actually, we could have both, but being abl
Monitoring Geronimo
---
Key: GERONIMO-4951
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4951
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: monitoring
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:50, Rex Wang wrote:
>
>
> 2009/11/12 Jarek Gawor
>>
>> Rex,
>>
>> This is a good start and I think this discussion and code should be
>> happening in Aries. But I do have a few comments/questions:
>
> Thank you very much! I also hope our work can be pushed to Aries when
Geronimo Revision: 835291 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091112/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091112/unit-test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Jacques Parent closed GERONIMO-4947.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Geronimo performance
>
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
