[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 885685

Geronimo Revision: 885685 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/unit-test

Re: Running G2.2 as a Windows-Service

After 2.2 is released, you should see a "Plug-in" item in the left navigation tree of the admin console and in that page you will be able to install procrun from the online 2.2 repository. If you need a quick solution, just download the files in the below location and put into /bin. http://svn.ap

Statistics name 'Connections Duration Count', 'Request Time CurrentTime' doen't exist in Monitoring DB ArchiveMRCDB

When using a Monitoring Vie in the Console with the names Request Time CurrentTime - 60 minute Connections Duration Count - 60 minute I get the Warning 2009-12-01 10:24:52,159 WARN [SnapshotDBHelper] Statistics name 'Connections Duration Count' does not exist 2009-12-01 10:34:00,776 WARN [Snaps

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.2 release (first try)

There might be something wired with my machine, but I'm seeing the below error when starting the release candidate in Windows XP with IBM JDK 1.5. Module 59/75 org.apache.geronimo.configs/activemq-ra/2.2/car 2009-12-01 17:52:00,562 ERROR [OpenEjbSystemGBean] Unable to deploy m

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 885755

Geronimo Revision: 885755 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091201/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091201/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 885762

Geronimo Revision: 885762 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/unit-test

Build our own org.apache.woden.woden-impl-dom bundle

Hi, Just found wonden-impl-dom places org.apache.xerces.parsers in its import packages list, after scanning the codes, it is not required, actually, in the previous 2.2 release, we do not ship xerces-impl. So, temporarily, I suggest to re-build our own woden-impl-dom bundle. Any comment ? --

dojo unresponsive

Hi, I played a bit with https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5-2.2-bin.tar.gz When I tried to open a tree entry (All -> Geronimo) in the JMX viewer, Firefox 3.5.5 stopped the scr

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 885862

Geronimo Revision: 885862 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091201/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091201/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 885900

Geronimo Revision: 885900 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/unit-test

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4753) Upgrade dwr to 3.0.M1 or figure out why it won't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12784451#action_12784451 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4753: I added the following to server-log4j.p

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.2 release (first try)

On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:27 AM, David Jencks wrote: > > If you mean the previous main geronimo releases, I strongly disagree. We > have no reason I can see to avoid following maven defaults here. With the > exception of the main geronimo release, previously done through an arcane and > IMO inco

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 886025

Geronimo Revision: 886025 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091201/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091201/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 886032

Geronimo Revision: 886032 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/unit-test

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4967) Enable Axis2 plugin in Geronimo 3.0

Enable Axis2 plugin in Geronimo 3.0 --- Key: GERONIMO-4967 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4967 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Task Security Level: public (Regular issues) Affects

Use tomcat trunk in some way?

I wonder if we should figure out a way to use tomcat trunk rather than our modifiec 6.0,20. They are presumably making some progress on servlet 3.0 and there are definitely some fixes we could use for instance the recent problem I fixed where jasper assumed all classloaders are URLClas

How to define those bundlized dependencies which would be published by Geronimo

Hi, In the plugin enabling work, we always need to exclude those non-bundle depdencies, and add the bundlized ones somewhere. But for those bundlized 3rd componenets which would publish by Geronimo in the folder framework/bundles, I think we may have two ways, take org.apache.geronimo.bundl

Re: Use tomcat trunk in some way?

Being different with 6.0.20, Tomcat trunk is under development, how to keep our codes are consistent with Tomcat's , Or, we just keep it temporarily for integrating our own patches ? 2009/12/2 David Jencks > I wonder if we should figure out a way to use tomcat trunk rather than our > modifiec 6

Re: dojo unresponsive

It is not a problem, that because the content of this tree entry you clicked is really a big one, and need some time to construct. Just click continue and wait a while. -Rex 2009/12/1 Juergen Weber > > Hi, > > I played a bit with > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache

[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 886061

Geronimo Revision: 886061 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20091202/build-0200.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20091202/unit-test-reports