On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:22 PM, Ivan wrote:
2009/12/2 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:01 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I have no problem with the idea of including dependencies on
bundleized versions of the original dependencies, this seems to me
like a good convention.
It is not returning a whole tree here. That's slow because there is a great
many MBeans under the entry All Mbeans - geronimo. From the literal
meaning, you can see that will return all the mbeans managed in geronimo.
Actually, when I re-write the jmx viewer with the 3.x dojo, I tried my best
to
Geronimo Revision: 886694 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091203/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091203/unit-test
Hi guys,
on the road map for the Web Profile stuff [1], I saw an (kinda)
incorrect status of the MyFaces 2.0 stuff for JSF 2.0
(Status of JEE6 Activity).
Apache MyFaces is activly working on a release. As a matter of fact,
there is a first alpha (TCK not passed) release out,
see [2] for the
I remembered that while the configuration optionaltrue/optional is
added, it should not cause the transitive dependency of the original jar
file. Will re-validate it later ..
2009/12/3 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:22 PM, Ivan wrote:
2009/12/2 David Jencks
I'm getting a LinkageError I don't know how to diagnose or fix when
building console-tomcat. I've committed all my code changes and
pushed pluto snapshots so it should be possible to reproduce.
Here's the stack trace:
[FelixDispatchQueue] DEBUG org.apache.geronimo.plugins.console-
On Dec 3, 2009, at 12:24 AM, Ivan wrote:
I remembered that while the configuration optionaltrue/optional
is added, it should not cause the transitive dependency of the
original jar file. Will re-validate it later ..
That is not my experience. At least, our geronimo dependency
Not sure whether I missed anything, From my understanding, it has nothing to
do with car-maven-plugin. While the optional is configurred with true, maven
would not add it as its dependency, and it has the same effect of marking
the original jar as an exclusion in the pom file of the project
Acutally both the styles are comfortable to me. So, let's always
import/export owned packages, maybe we would never encounter the
backward-compatiblity issue :-)
2009/12/3 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Dec 2, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
Currently, Geronimo uses many
Remove those specs and impl which are shipped by JRE 1.6
Key: GERONIMO-4970
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4970
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security
Geronimo Revision: 886765 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091203/build-0800.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091203/unit-test-reports
Geronimo Revision: 886780 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091203/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091203/unit-test
Yes. That's my experience with optional setting too.
Jarek
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure whether I missed anything, From my understanding, it has nothing to
do with car-maven-plugin. While the optional is configurred with true, maven
would not add it as
On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:47 AM, Trygve Hardersen wrote:
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
error: error reading
Actually, Java EE 6 dictates which version of the specs we will need
to support. For example, Java EE 6 requires JAX-WS 2.2 and JAXB 2.2
but Sun JDK 6 ships with JAX-WS 2.1 and JAXB 2.1 at this point. And it
used to be that Sun JDK 6 (_03 and less) shipped with JAX-WS 2.0 and
JAXB 2.0. So we can't
On Thu December 3 2009 10:51:18 am Jarek Gawor wrote:
Actually, Java EE 6 dictates which version of the specs we will need
to support. For example, Java EE 6 requires JAX-WS 2.2 and JAXB 2.2
but Sun JDK 6 ships with JAX-WS 2.1 and JAXB 2.1 at this point. And it
used to be that Sun JDK 6 (_03
The servlet classes was coming from within the war file. Just marked
the servlet dependency as provided. Things looks better now but
getting another error.
Jarek
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:46 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm getting a LinkageError I don't know how to diagnose or
Geronimo Revision: 886879 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091203/build-1400.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091203/unit-test-reports
Recognize Aries applications in Geronimo
Key: GERONIMO-4971
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4971
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular
Geronimo Revision: 886897 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091203/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091203/unit-test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785488#action_12785488
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-4971:
---
FYI - The
Geronimo Revision: 887017 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091203/build-2000.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091203/unit-test-reports
Thanks, I will check the version carefully, and only remove those which have
been shipped.
2009/12/3 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org
On Thu December 3 2009 10:51:18 am Jarek Gawor wrote:
Actually, Java EE 6 dictates which version of the specs we will need
to support. For example, Java EE 6
I am afraid that MyFaces 2.0 may not work in the Geronimo 3.0 now, for
currently it does not accept Servlet 3.0 API, it seems that I could not
start the MyFaces bundle in the OSGI environment. :-(
2009/12/3 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Hi guys,
on the road map for the Web Profile
Working on the admin console I've run into the problem that ears most
naturally translate into more than one osgi bundle -- at least one
bundle for each web module, maybe one per module.
Right now the deployment system is putting the wars inside the car
file, just like in 2.2, but as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785706#action_12785706
]
Ivan commented on GERONIMO-4967:
Add some bundlized third-party components at revision:
Geronimo Revision: 887033 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091203/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091203/unit-test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785765#action_12785765
]
Ivan commented on GERONIMO-4967:
Commit changes to trunk At revision: 887060.
Enable
Nested child configurations from ears don't work well with osgi
---
Key: GERONIMO-4972
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4972
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Geronimo Revision: 887085 built with tests included
See the full build-0200.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20091204/build-0200.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20091204/unit-test-reports
For method (1), how to wrap all the content from WARs and ejb JARs in a
single bundle. Do you mean just expand the WARs and JARs in the bundle?
2009/12/4 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
Working on the admin console I've run into the problem that ears most
naturally translate into more than
31 matches
Mail list logo
