[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4990) Add serialVersionUID to serializable spec classes from javadoc

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12848037#action_12848037 ] Delos Dai commented on GERONIMO-4990: - geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec updated in rev 925968

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5196) Add a own authenticator for Spnego login

Add a own authenticator for Spnego login Key: GERONIMO-5196 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5196 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public (Regular

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 925985

Geronimo Revision: 925985 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100322/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100322/unit-test

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5197) Generic Header based authentication support in geronimo

Generic Header based authentication support in geronimo --- Key: GERONIMO-5197 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5197 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4990) Add serialVersionUID to serializable spec classes from javadoc

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12848060#action_12848060 ] Delos Dai commented on GERONIMO-4990: - geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec updated in rev 925998

Re: Discussion: Possible fixes for GERONIMO-5180

I will apply the fix to this issue tomorrow to g 2.1 branch. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Ashish Jain ashja...@gmail.com wrote: I tried fixing this up by making FileKeystoreInstance serializable however I hit another issue java.rmi.UnmarshalException: error unmarshalling return; nested

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5198) MultiParentClassLoader caching not found resources

MultiParentClassLoader caching not found resources -- Key: GERONIMO-5198 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5198 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4535) Alternate Node Discovery for Plugin Based Farming

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang reassigned GERONIMO-4535: - Assignee: Shawn Jiang Alternate Node Discovery for Plugin Based Farming

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4535) Alternate Node Discovery for Plugin Based Farming

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang resolved GERONIMO-4535. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2.1 Resolved this JIRA with a WADI based plugin

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-5105) Create JACC 1.4 spec jar

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Delos Dai reassigned GERONIMO-5105: --- Assignee: Delos Dai Create JACC 1.4 spec jar -

Re: Pulling Geronimo Configuration

Added WADI based plugin farm to 22 branch with this JIRA. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4535 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4535 On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Chance Yeoman cyeo...@cait.org wrote: Hi Gianny, I'll take a shot at it. I am brand new to the

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-5179) Create a new customized ActiveMQ 4.1.2 build for Geronimo 2.1.5

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan closed GERONIMO-5179. -- Resolution: Fixed Create a new customized ActiveMQ 4.1.2 build for Geronimo 2.1.5

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-5194) Patch for geronimo-jcdi spec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire reassigned GERONIMO-5194: -- Assignee: Rick McGuire Patch for geronimo-jcdi spec

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-5194) Patch for geronimo-jcdi spec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-5194. Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 926014. Thanks Gurkan! Patch for geronimo-jcdi

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5196) Add a own authenticator for Spnego login

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12848075#action_12848075 ] Ashish Jain commented on GERONIMO-5196: --- New code is available @

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 926041

Geronimo Revision: 926041 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100322/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100322/unit-test-reports

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5199) GShell equivalent for server startup with secure option, command unlock keystore and command redeploy for farming

GShell equivalent for server startup with secure option, command unlock keystore and command redeploy for farming - Key: GERONIMO-5199 URL:

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 926061

Geronimo Revision: 926061 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100322/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100322/unit-test

Re: Any idea why the 2.1.5 daily build binaries are not transfered correctly?

I did have to kill a few scp processes a few days ago so that might have caused it. But looks like the files are uploaded fine now. Jarek On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote: The G 2.1.5 daily builds are damaged when publish to

Google Summer of Code

Hi all, The Google Summer of Code program is starting up. If you are interested please see http://community.apache.org/gsoc.html for more information on becoming a mentor and/or submitting a project idea. Does anyone have a cool project idea for GSoC? Jarek

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5095) Create JAX-RS spec jar

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12848246#action_12848246 ] Bryant Luk commented on GERONIMO-5095: -- I think the 1.0 api spec is mostly done

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 926209

Geronimo Revision: 926209 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100322/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100322/unit-test-reports

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5095) Create JAX-RS spec jar

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12848283#action_12848283 ] Bryant Luk commented on GERONIMO-5095: -- JAX-RS 1.1 is at

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 926255

Geronimo Revision: 926255 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100322/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100322/unit-test

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 926396

Geronimo Revision: 926396 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100322/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100322/unit-test-reports

Re: Any idea why the 2.1.5 daily build binaries are not transfered correctly?

Yep, thanks so much, Jarek :-) 2010/3/22 Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com I did have to kill a few scp processes a few days ago so that might have caused it. But looks like the files are uploaded fine now. Jarek On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote: The G 2.1.5

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5147) deploy.sh exits with non-zero status because of stty echo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan updated GERONIMO-5147: --- Affects Version/s: 3.0 2.1.4 Fix Version/s: 3.0

{DISCUSS} Remove Spnego Support from Geronimo 2.1.5?

Will Tomcat community plan to apply our fixes to their code base soon? If not, because this Friday we will ship release candidate build of G 2.1.5, I prefer to remove Spnego support this time. The related JIRAs that need to revert are: GERONIMO - 5128 GERONIMO - 5129 Thoughts? -- Lei Wang

Re: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010?

Apologies for the broadcast message... In thinking about ApacheCon 2010, I began to wonder if there is interest in creating an Enterprise Java track for the conference. I think there is the potential for a lot of interesting content. Many of our projects are busy implementing JSR specs for

Re: {DISCUSS} Remove Spnego Support from Geronimo 2.1.5?

On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Rex Wang wrote: Will Tomcat community plan to apply our fixes to their code base soon? If not, because this Friday we will ship release candidate build of G 2.1.5, I prefer to remove Spnego support this time. The related JIRAs that need to revert are:

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5197) Generic Header based authentication support in geronimo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-5197: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.5) Wish List Move to wish list since we won't