After investigating the files in question there is no doubt in my mind that we
have to cancel the vote. If someone from BCEL can demonstrate that they should
be in apache svn, with an apache license, then we could proceed.
We could also look into replacing the tomcat code with xbean-finder. II
Geronimo Revision: 939889 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430
[INFO] BUILD
Thanks for checking it, usually, I "hate" those license related issues ;-)
Just find that Kevan has post a message in Tomcat community, so depending on
the result there, we could decide whether we would continue or cancel this
vote.
2010/5/1 David Jencks
> Mark Thomas changed the license in rev
Geronimo Revision: 939875 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100430/build-2000.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100430/unit-test-reports
Mark Thomas changed the license in rev 934219 on april 14 2010. That change
and rev 934220 seem to indicate that the tomcat community thinks including EPL
source in apache svn and releases is fine. The tomcat copies are modified from
the bcel "originals" including:
- changing the package name
On Apr 30, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> IIUC then I think we do need to fix this for the following reasons:
>
> 1) We are releasing these artifacts - even if they are copies of Tomcat
> artifacts. The artifact is being released under the groupID
> "org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat" an
Geronimo Revision: 939783 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430/unit-test
IIUC then I think we do need to fix this for the following reasons:
1) We are releasing these artifacts - even if they are copies of Tomcat
artifacts. The artifact is being released under the groupID
"org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat" and it is being released in source (not
just binary) form.
FYI. Forwarding the ApacheCon CFP from annou...@apachecon.com
--kevan
On Apr 28, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Sally Khudairi wrote:
> ApacheCon North America 2010
> 1-5 November 2010 -- Westin Peachtree in Atlanta
>
> Technical Tracks: Call For Participation
> All submissions must be received by Friday, 28
Since those are Tomcat source files, does that really mean we have to
fix their source before we can re-release it?
-Donald
On 4/30/10 1:10 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> -1 (sorry)
>
> There are some files with invalid license headers:
> /util/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/bcel/classfile/Enc
geronimo-jaspi jaspic provider won't work well under osgi
-
Key: GERONIMO-5280
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5280
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security
Geronimo Revision: 939748 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100430/build-1400.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100430/unit-test-reports
Oh ... one more little thing I forgot to mention is that the link to the
staging repo in the vote is incorrect as it resolves to -027 instead of -030
Joe
On 4/30/10 1:10 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
-1 (sorry)
There are some files with invalid license headers:
/util/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/ut
The vote to release the Java EE schema xmlbean wrappers passes with 5 +1
votes and no -1 or 0 votes. Voting +1 were
Rick McGuire
Jarek Gawor
Donald Woods
Hai Hong Xu (Ivan)
Joe Bohn
The release artifacts will be promoted to central this afternoon.
Rick
On 4/27/2010 1:18 PM, Rick McGuire wrot
Vote passes with 10 +1 and no other votes.
Rob Davies
Dejan Bosanac
Gary Tully
Timothy BIsh
Hiram Chirino
Jim Gomes
Bruce Snyder
David Jencks
Colin MacNaughton
Guillaume Nodet (on the geronimo dev list :-))
I'll promote the staging repo.
I haven't found any recent maven sites, and there is so li
Thanks, Joe.
Looks like the site is synchronized successfully now.
And I spot-checked several pages on Geronimo website randomly and noticed
that {indent} macro is not working any more in Confluence 3.2. So I fixed
the pages with the problem by removing the macro.
Anything else, I'll update thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862751#action_12862751
]
Anup Dixit commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-601:
-
Hi all,
I have checke
-1 (sorry)
There are some files with invalid license headers:
/util/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/bcel/classfile/EnclosingMethod.java
/util/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/bcel/classfile/LocalVariableTypeTable.java
Joe
On 4/28/10 6:30 AM, Ivan wrote:
Please vote for Geronimo Cus
+1
Donald
On 4/28/10 6:30 AM, Ivan wrote:
> Please vote for Geronimo Customized Tomcat 7.0.0.0
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/o
+1
2010/4/30 Joe Bohn
> +1
>
> Joe
>
>
> On 4/28/10 8:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the
>> newly created bundles components.
>> This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have
>> been converted into OS
+1
Joe
On 4/27/10 1:18 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release the 3 Java EE schema xmlbean wrapper jars. These are xmlbean
classes generated from the different J2EE 1.4, Java EE 5, and Java EE 6
schemas. These are used by different Ge
+1
Joe
On 4/28/10 8:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the
newly created bundles components.
This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have
been converted into OSGi jars.
This is a single vote for all of the c
+1
Joe
On 4/29/10 2:07 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I guess I don't have an issue with the presence of the SNAPSHOT aliases
(at least not enough to stop the vote). I still have to finish
verification of the content but since you have enough votes you can go
ahead without me.
Joe
On 4/29/10 11:52 AM,
I think some of the SNAPSHOT references in the artifact-aliases are not
necessary but that isn't a big deal.
The jpa-tests still bother me but I guess they are not really part of
vote since we're not building or releasing them even though the they are
included in the tag referenced as part o
Geronimo Revision: 939653 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430/build-0900.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430
[INFO] BUILD
I can avoid this error if I build Geronimo with the ActiveMQ 5.3.2 image
that is currently being voted on.
So, as Ivan mentioned, it appears that the latest SNAPSHOT available is
not up to date and we move past this error once we move to the released
ActiveMQ version.
Joe
On 4/30/10 9:07 A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Jiang updated GERONIMO-5218:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.2.1
2.2.2
3.0
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Jiang updated GERONIMO-5217:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.2.1
2.2.2
Affects Version/s: 2.2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Jiang updated GERONIMO-5217:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Affects Version/s: 3.0
> History.back and History.forward is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862677#action_12862677
]
Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4950:
---
#1 is completed, the infrastructure for #
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Jiang closed GERONIMO-5217.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in
2...@rev939670
tr...@rev939671
> History.back and History.forwa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Jiang closed GERONIMO-5218.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in
22 @rev939665
trunk @rev939666
> The portlets page in iframe h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Jiang reassigned GERONIMO-5218:
-
Assignee: Shawn Jiang
> The portlets page in iframe height is limited in debug view, s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Jiang reassigned GERONIMO-5217:
-
Assignee: Shawn Jiang
> History.back and History.forward is not working correctly afte
The activemq-core jar file in the apache snapshot site seems not the latest
one, you might need to build it mannually. And the vote for activemq 5.3.2
is ongoing ...
2010/4/30 Joe Bohn
> I recently did an svn update and build of trunk (yesterday) and I'm now
> getting an error attempting to star
If I'm understanding this correctly it seems that activemq wants
annotation version 1.0.0 (or greater) but not 1.1.0. Our
geronimo-annotation spec is for spec version 1.0 but the bundle version
1.1.0. So I think we may have some version confusion.
Joe
On 4/30/10 8:59 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I
I recently did an svn update and build of trunk (yesterday) and I'm now
getting an error attempting to start a trunk server. My svn version is
939402
Could not start bundle:
org.apache.geronimo.modules.geronimo-activemq-blueprint [238]
org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constrain
Geronimo Revision: 939642 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100430/build-0800.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100430/unit-test-reports
Geronimo Revision: 939568 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430/build-0300.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430
[INFO] BUILD
39 matches
Mail list logo