Geronimo Revision: 955809 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100617/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100617
[INFO] BUILD
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> Right, stay with SE 5. But document that there might be some potential
> issue(e.g. webservice problems caused by SE 6 bundled saaj and jaxb) when
> working with SE 6.
>
> So far, we have document for G2.2 at [1] as below:
Geronimo v2.2 ca
fixed the geronimo-plugins.xml accordingly. Thanks Kevan for catching this.
I also update my 2.1.5 release tips(at the page bottom):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.5+Release+Tips
Will get the process merge when have time..
thanks
2010/6/17 Kevan Miller
>
> O
Right, stay with SE 5. But document that there might be some potential
issue(e.g. webservice problems caused by SE 6 bundled saaj and jaxb) when
working with SE 6.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> OK, just found GERONIMO-5369 and it turns out not to be an issue, so
> lets
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12880047#action_12880047
]
Ben Liang commented on GERONIMO-5325:
-
Attach a new patch to fix the problem.
Rex,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ben Liang updated GERONIMO-5325:
Attachment: 5325_huge_blank.patch
> iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ben Liang reopened GERONIMO-5325:
-
Hi all,
Reopen this jira because the patch did not fix the problem that there is huge
blank at t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12880044#action_12880044
]
Ben Liang commented on GERONIMO-5367:
-
Hi all,
I attach another patch to make the d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ben Liang updated GERONIMO-5367:
Attachment: 5367.patch
> Some page should be improved into dojo style
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ben Liang updated GERONIMO-5367:
Attachment: (was: 5367_monitoring_Ben.patch)
> Some page should be improved into dojo style
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ben Liang updated GERONIMO-5367:
Attachment: (was: 5367_infoManager_Ben.patch)
> Some page should be improved into dojo style
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> > On 6/17/2010 11:20 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> >> I'd be fine with requiring Java SE 6 for 2.2.1 and follow-on releases.
> >>
> >
> > Is that even allowed by the Java EE 5 certification
I'm trying to stage a new Geronimo 2.1.6 release for a vote, but I
appear to be hanging while doing the release:perform. It looks like
it's trying to upload the first file to the staging repo, and then just
sits there. There's no sign of a new repository getting created on the
staging repo.
Geronimo Revision: 955711 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100617/build-1500.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100617
[INFO] BUILD
OK, just found GERONIMO-5369 and it turns out not to be an issue, so
lets stay with SE 5 for 2.2.
-Donald
On 6/17/10 12:26 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> On 6/17/2010 11:20 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>> I'd be fine with requiring Java SE 6 for
I thought there was an earlier discussion about some component using new
security features of Java SE 6, but can't find that thread now
Maybe Shawn can give more details as to why we should consider the move.
-Donald
On 6/17/10 12:26 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Woldrich deleted GERONIMODEVTOOLS-645:
---
> Deploy JEE artifacts in-place to developer support tools like JRebel
On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 6/17/2010 11:20 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> I'd be fine with requiring Java SE 6 for 2.2.1 and follow-on releases.
>>
>
> Is that even allowed by the Java EE 5 certification rules?
Yes, but I don't think it really matters. I don't think w
On 6/17/2010 11:20 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I'd be fine with requiring Java SE 6 for 2.2.1 and follow-on releases.
Is that even allowed by the Java EE 5 certification rules?
Rick
-Donald
On 6/16/10 10:40 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
We should change the 2.2 build JDK from 6 to 5 because
Another choice for #7 would be to include/reuse index tags in the Docs
(like #CreateDataSource) which the console could then launch a browser
to a Google search of our geronimo.a.o domain, along with including the
release tag (GMOxDoc22), so maybe the 2.2 doc search results would be
first in the re
I'd be fine with requiring Java SE 6 for 2.2.1 and follow-on releases.
-Donald
On 6/16/10 10:40 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> We should change the 2.2 build JDK from 6 to 5 because we can't start
> the server with jdk 5 if we build 2.2 branch with jdk 6. See [1] for
> more background.
>
> Jarek,
>
Geronimo Revision: 955581 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100617/build-0900.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100617
[INFO] BUILD
On Apr 13, 2010, at 3:01 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Vote passes with the following voting +1:
> Kevan Miller, Donald Woods, Ivan
> and also got +1 from:
> Ashish, Amit, ASHOK, Jay D., Forrest and me.
>
> There were no 0 or -1 votes. Will perform the release and announce it.
Rex,
The geronimo-plugin
I'm using Geronimo 2.2
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Define-context-to-serves-a-directory-s-content-through-Geronimo-tp900174p902175.html
Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks.
My Java Bridge problem got resolved. Normal PHP file is working nicely like
php file with echo command.
Actually I have created one cloud computing application which is in PHP and
I have used Windows Azure sdk for PHP as my class library. That is working
fine in XAMPP.
But I have to int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879700#action_12879700
]
Forrest Xia commented on GERONIMO-5020:
---
This is an interesting problem. If I keep
26 matches
Mail list logo
