[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 1037388

2010-11-20 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1037388 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20101121/build-0200.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20101121/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1037369

2010-11-20 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1037369 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101120/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101120 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1037362

2010-11-20 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1037362 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101120/build-2000.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101120 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1037320

2010-11-20 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1037320 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101120/build-1500.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101120 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1037293

2010-11-20 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1037293 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101120/build-1400.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101120 [INFO] BUILD

Re: Geronimo Branding

2010-11-20 Thread Dave Horsey
Thanks Kevan, added myself on confluence (userid davehorsey). Completely up for providing documentation contributions. So I guess the next question is - assuming theres nothing else I need to do beforehand (ICLA being in place) - are you ok to add me as a contributor ? Regards Dave On Fri, Nov 1

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1037197

2010-11-20 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1037197 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101120/build-0800.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101120 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1037220

2010-11-20 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1037220 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101120/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101120/unit-test

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.7 (1st try)

2010-11-20 Thread Rex Wang
+1 from myself. 2010/11/20 Rex Wang > Hi Devs, > > A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.7 has been created and staged. > > The tag has been created here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.7/ > > The staging repo is here: > > https://repository.apache.org/con

[VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.7 (1st try)

2010-11-20 Thread Rex Wang
Hi Devs, A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.7 has been created and staged. The tag has been created here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.7/ The staging repo is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/ The main artifa

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1037133

2010-11-20 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1037133 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101120/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101120 [INFO] BUILD

How many bean validation tck tests are there?

2010-11-20 Thread David Jencks
I'm seeing a strange problem in geronimo when I run the bean validation tck where trying to determine the annotations on some test classes throws an exception and no annotations can be discovered. So at least in the server the testng annotations announcing that it's a test won't be discovered.