[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1065343

2011-01-30 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1065343 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110130/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110130/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1065254

2011-01-30 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1065254 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110130/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110130/unit-test-reports

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5794) Annoying unrelated warning messages when deploying a simple EBA.

2011-01-30 Thread Ivan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12988556#action_12988556 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-5794: I am thinking to use the same strategy for adding the g

Re: svn commit: r1064472 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: plugins/jaxws/geronimo-jaxws-sun-tools/pom.xml plugins/jaxws/pom.xml plugins/webservices/pom.xml pom.xml

2011-01-30 Thread Ivan
Thanks, Shawn, will update it. 2011/1/30 Shawn Jiang > Many of geronimo developer has following mirror in the settings.xml for > some known problem within g2.x [1]. > > >java.net >Mirror of > https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/ >http

Re: svn commit: r1064472 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: plugins/jaxws/geronimo-jaxws-sun-tools/pom.xml plugins/jaxws/pom.xml plugins/webservices/pom.xml pom.xml

2011-01-30 Thread Shawn Jiang
Many of geronimo developer has following mirror in the settings.xml for some known problem within g2.x [1]. java.net Mirror of https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/ http://download.java.net/maven/1/ java.net I suggest to

Re: deadlocks found in tomcat-web m2 release when running tck.

2011-01-30 Thread David Jencks
Hi Ivan, Here's my current thinking on this. I could easily be wrong about many aspects of this :-) and I'm not done... I think there are two kinds of problems to avoid here. The easy one is to synchronize access to our configuration tracking objects. I think we can do this by synchronizing