Re: [DISCUSSION] The OBR feature in Geronimo3.0

Hi Yi, I chatted with jbonofre a little bit on IRC and don't quite understand what you are trying to do. According to jbonofre, installing the set of resolved bundles suggested by obr is already implemented for a long time by obr:deploy and (as of yesterday?) osgi:install obr:id/version

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-5987) The ActiveMQ working directory and port are not referenced correctly - multiple instances not possible

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-5987: --- Attachment: GERONIMO-5987.patch The ActiveMQ working directory and port are not referenced

Re: [DISCUSSION] The OBR feature in Geronimo3.0

Hi David, The difference between the obr:deploy and the obr:geronimo-install is: obr:deploy just install the bundle and the dependent bundles in OSGi framework, if the server shutdown and start with -clean, the bundles will not exist any more; The obr:geronimo-install will persist the bundles

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1157778

Geronimo Revision: 1157778 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110815/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110815/unit-test-reports

Re: [DISCUSSION] The OBR feature in Geronimo3.0

Hi Yi, I think the question of what should survive a clean start and what form the info about it should take needs more discussion. I chatted with jbonofre and anierbeck about my understanding of what you are trying to do and they'd like it in karaf and/or cave, they opened

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1157912

Geronimo Revision: 1157912 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110815/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110815/unit-test-reports

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-5743) ServletContext.getRealPath() returns null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13085387#comment-13085387 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5743: In my opinion, we need to treat this

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1158057

Geronimo Revision: 1158057 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110815/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110815/unit-test-reports

Re: [DISCUSSION] The OBR feature in Geronimo3.0

Hi David, Ok, that's great! I've looked into the karaf's obr:intall command, I will discuss it in KARAF-814. Thanks, David. On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:29 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote: Hi Yi, I think the question of what should survive a clean start and what form the info

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-5743) ServletContext.getRealPath() returns null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan updated GERONIMO-5743: --- Affects Version/s: (was: 3.0-M2) 3.0-M1 Fix Version/s: 3.0

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-5743) ServletContext.getRealPath() returns null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13085509#comment-13085509 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-5743: Will come up a temporary solution for this, as it is

[jira] [Assigned] (GERONIMO-6110) On 3.0 we don't register the 61616 port and the IP address for the server socket is not correct.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Han Hong Fang reassigned GERONIMO-6110: --- Assignee: Han Hong Fang On 3.0 we don't register the 61616 port and the IP