[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg resolved GERONIMO-6441.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> remove unused genesis modules
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13596920#comment-13596920
]
Mark Struberg commented on GERONIMO-6441:
-
I now removed
* genesis-skin
* gen
Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6441:
---
Summary: remove unused genesis modules
Key: GERONIMO-6441
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6441
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Txs for catching this!
I gonna reroll after this has been fixed.
It seems the 2 genesis modules you mentioned are not even in the
section since quite some time. Thus I gonna delete them from SVN if noone
objects.
Btw, the whole genesis project seems to be in a very bad shape. It e.g.
refe
Thank you for putting this all together! However, I did find a few problems:
-1 for genesis. 1) geronimo-maven-plugin and geronimo-skip have
SNAPHOST parents. If these are no longer needed then we should drop
them from svn and not release them. 2) There is pluginRepository
defined which points to
Thx Mark
2013/3/7 Mark Struberg
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13.
>
> The Maven Staging Repo which contains both releases (xbean needs genesis):
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/
>
>
> SVN source tag for genesis:
> https:/
Hi!
I'd like to call a VOTE on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13.
The Maven Staging Repo which contains both releases (xbean needs genesis):
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/
SVN source tag for genesis:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/genesis/tags/gene
Hi folks!
Due to releasing genesis (where the cleanup was long time overdue) and xbean in
one go, I had to upgrade the parent pom of xbean to genesis-2.1 which is
contained in the same staging repo. As this is not yet released, the CI for
xbean is currently defunct until the release gets pushed
On Mar 7, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> If noone objects, then I gonna roll a genesis + xbean release tonight into a
> single staging area.
Sounds good to me.
--kevan
Hi folks!
If noone objects, then I gonna roll a genesis + xbean release tonight into a
single staging area.
LieGrue,
strub
Hi folks!
Has there been some work done already on the interceptors-1.2 specification?
We gonna need this for EJB-3.2 and CDI-1.1. Marina posted a PFD. I did a quick
scan through and it looks fine.
Not sure when I can find a bit time for it, but I'm interested in helping with
it.
LieGrue,
11 matches
Mail list logo