[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6441) remove unused genesis modules

2013-03-07 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved GERONIMO-6441. - Resolution: Fixed > remove unused genesis modules > -

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6441) remove unused genesis modules

2013-03-07 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13596920#comment-13596920 ] Mark Struberg commented on GERONIMO-6441: - I now removed * genesis-skin * gen

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6441) remove unused genesis modules

2013-03-07 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6441: --- Summary: remove unused genesis modules Key: GERONIMO-6441 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6441 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Task

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-07 Thread Mark Struberg
Txs for catching this! I gonna reroll after this has been fixed. It seems the 2 genesis modules you mentioned are not even in the section since quite some time. Thus I gonna delete them from SVN if noone objects. Btw, the whole genesis project seems to be in a very bad shape. It e.g. refe

Re: [VOTE] Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-07 Thread Jarek Gawor
Thank you for putting this all together! However, I did find a few problems: -1 for genesis. 1) geronimo-maven-plugin and geronimo-skip have SNAPHOST parents. If these are no longer needed then we should drop them from svn and not release them. 2) There is pluginRepository defined which points to

Re: [VOTE] Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-07 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Thx Mark 2013/3/7 Mark Struberg > Hi! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13. > > The Maven Staging Repo which contains both releases (xbean needs genesis): > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/ > > > SVN source tag for genesis: > https:/

[VOTE] Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-07 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13. The Maven Staging Repo which contains both releases (xbean needs genesis): https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/ SVN source tag for genesis: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/genesis/tags/gene

xbean trunk temporarily defunct

2013-03-07 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi folks! Due to releasing genesis (where the cleanup was long time overdue) and xbean in one go, I had to upgrade the parent pom of xbean to genesis-2.1 which is contained in the same staging repo. As this is not yet released, the CI for xbean is currently defunct until the release gets pushed

Re: genesis + xbean release train

2013-03-07 Thread Kevan Miller
On Mar 7, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi folks! > > If noone objects, then I gonna roll a genesis + xbean release tonight into a > single staging area. Sounds good to me. --kevan

genesis + xbean release train

2013-03-07 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi folks! If noone objects, then I gonna roll a genesis + xbean release tonight into a single staging area. LieGrue, strub

interceptors-1.2 specification

2013-03-07 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi folks! Has there been some work done already on the interceptors-1.2 specification? We gonna need this for EJB-3.2 and CDI-1.1. Marina posted a PFD. I did a quick scan through and  it looks fine. Not sure when I can find a bit time for it, but I'm interested in helping with it. LieGrue,