looks a good start, can you either create a PR (
https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/tree/trunk/geronimo-javamail_1.4
) or a patch and attach it to the issue please?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmanni
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6527
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Salyh wrote:
> The geronimo tests pass, but the test from RI javax.* not (including things i
> never touched like header folding for example)
>
>
>> Am 04.08.2014 um 18:58 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
>>
>> Not
Hendrik Saly created GERONIMO-6527:
--
Summary: JavaMail 1.5 spec
Key: GERONIMO-6527
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6527
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Se
The geronimo tests pass, but the test from RI javax.* not (including things i
never touched like header folding for example)
> Am 04.08.2014 um 18:58 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> Not yet
>
> Just catch as much as test as you can and it will be good for an
> alpha/beta release (ie not certi
Not yet
Just catch as much as test as you can and it will be good for an
alpha/beta release (ie not certified)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-04 18:2
do we have the javamail 1.5 TCK already?
I am pretty much close to submit the 1.5 spec impl.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi Hendrik
>
> Awesome! Didnt target it before being web profile compliant but great if
> already in place
>
> Le 1 août 2014 09:51, "Hendrik D
Imo we still miss fully passing the CDI-1.1/1.2 TCK.
LieGrue,
strub
On Monday, 4 August 2014, 15:02, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
>
>
>Hi
>
>wondered about a release train?
>
>was thinking about jcdi 1.1, interceptor, json, and few others. Main
>question is: can we test signatures or do we mis
Hi
wondered about a release train?
was thinking about jcdi 1.1, interceptor, json, and few others. Main
question is: can we test signatures or do we miss some tck parts?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibu
Hi!
I'd say geronimo-interceptor-1.2.0 is pretty much ready.
We test it as part of the BVal and CDI TCK. BVal-1.1 passes the TCK already and
OpenWebBeans only has a few failing tests which are imo not interceptor related.
Any problem if I start with the release?
LieGrue,
strub
