Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-interceptor-1.2 spec API

2015-04-04 Thread Alan D . Cabrera
Time to wrap up this vote? :) Regards, Alan > On Apr 1, 2015, at 1:52 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-interceptor-1.2_spec-1.0 jar. > This is an API which implements the interceptor MR-1.2 specification. > The changes got tested via the ALv2 licen

Board report time 2015-04

2015-04-04 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the

Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-04-04 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Time to wrap up this vote? :) Regards, Alan > On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag. Can you > at least tell us the svn revision? > > +1 - binding > > >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Buca

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-annotation-1.2 spec API

2015-04-04 Thread Alan D . Cabrera
Time to wrap up this vote? :) Regards, Alan > On Apr 1, 2015, at 1:52 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-annotation-1.2_spec-1.0 jar. > This is an API which implements the common-annotations JSR-250 MR-1.2 > specification. > The only change was the

Re: CDI spec jar release

2015-04-04 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Was private constants but it is fixed Le 4 avr. 2015 10:10, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" a écrit : > Hey Mark, > > I think it was just the constructor signature which was a bit different. > But not a big deal and nothing else as far as I recall. > It was just a reminder ;-) > > Thanks > JLouis > > Le je

Re: CDI spec jar release

2015-04-04 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Hey Mark, I think it was just the constructor signature which was a bit different. But not a big deal and nothing else as far as I recall. It was just a reminder ;-) Thanks JLouis Le jeu. 2 avr. 2015 à 23:05, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi Jean-Louis! > > > I added a few JavaDocs and we tweaked