Re: PR Merge?

2016-08-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 21 août 2016 12:24, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > > We should imo check the spec wording. > If it's not specified in > > * the spec PDF > * the official JavaDoc > * the TCK > There is nothing > then we are pretty free to implement it however we think it's best. > > > Most of the 'standard' spec

Re: PR Merge?

2016-08-21 Thread Mark Struberg
We should imo check the spec wording. If it's not specified in * the spec PDF * the official JavaDoc * the TCK then we are pretty free to implement it however we think it's best. Most of the 'standard' spec api jars e.g. don't support OSGi, but in Geronimo we do. LieGrue, strub On Sunda

Re: PR Merge?

2016-08-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Just need to copy it from other spec. I have nothing against it. Alternative is in johnzon to return an impl instead of using the provider again. Maybe sthg to investigate Le 21 août 2016 02:03, "Clebert Suconic" a écrit : > I Will be back from vacations on Tuesday. I could do some of this > we