anyway.
hope this helps
david jencks
On Feb 7, 2008, at 12:26 PM, AlskiOnTheWeb wrote:
...Thanks, I saw that one before but since we're using Geronimo 1.0
with
Jetty, I'm hung out to dry there unless someone took up the authors
advice
and went and tried some equivalent thing in Jetty
Hi All,
Sorry if this is posted here somewhere but I couldn't find anything on it by
searching. Anyway, I have an application with an Axis 2 web service that is
deployed in a Geronimo 1.0 (yes, I know, but I'm stuck with it) application
server. The issue I see is that the connector (listening on
to
determine what all the web apps might mean.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 7, 2008, at 11:49 AM, AlskiOnTheWeb wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry if this is posted here somewhere but I couldn't find anything
on it by
searching. Anyway, I have an application with an Axis 2 web service
]
Not knowing very much about how the version graph of maven is determined, I
can't quite figure out how to move on. Any suggestions?
Also, is 1.2 the first 1.x version that supports java 1.5?
Thanks.
Alski
AlskiOnTheWeb wrote:
...OK. I've downgraded maven to 2.0.7 and am trying the staged build
-incubating but that
didn't exist.
Thanks.
Alski
AlskiOnTheWeb wrote:
Well, with maven 2.0.7 and the 1,2 sources pulled from svn, I did the
staged build. The -Dstage=bootstrap built fine but the second
-Dstage=assemble failed with:
[INFO
Hi all,
I first downloaded the source tar and tried to build that. No go as it was
missing some snapshots now. Not knowing the slightest bit about maven (nor
wanting to really), I pulled a source tree of the 1.2 tag. I am using Sun's
JDK 1.5.0_12 with Maven 2.0.8 trying to build source from
this helps
david jencks
On Jan 22, 2008, at 10:52 AM, AlskiOnTheWeb wrote:
Hi all,
I first downloaded the source tar and tried to build that. No go as
it was
missing some snapshots now. Not knowing the slightest bit about
maven (nor
wanting to really), I pulled a source tree
have personally had problems building trunk with 2.0.8
- So I reverted back to 2.0.7).
Jay
AlskiOnTheWeb wrote:
I wish it were that simple. Unfortunately, I've got to at least try
and
apply some patches and configuration from a custom build of 1.0 :-( which
means I need something
seriously consider migrating your changes to the 2.x codebase.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 22, 2008, at 11:24 AM, AlskiOnTheWeb wrote:
I wish it were that simple. Unfortunately, I've got to at least
try and
apply some patches and configuration from a custom build of 1.0
