Yes. I'm in.
-brian
On 8/24/07, Gordon Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I too would like to listen in.
>
> Regards,
> Gordon
>
> Daryl Richter wrote:
> > On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:04 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Any other people interested ?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I wouldn't mind listening
Following the se tutorial:
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/hello-world-se.html
The code produced from the mvn archetype failed the checkstyle check
(with errors).
Has anyone else experienced this?
(I also had to go in and update the version in the pom.xml, so it
would pull a current rele
der deployables/serviceengines. So, it will be able to
drop right in when we have it working.
best regards,
brian
On 6/29/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/29/07, Brian O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> OK. So I officially started a new service
or EJB and JBI (positioning JBI as a lower level
"implementation" construct). I understand your concerns though, and
haven't yet decided whether or not an would be a
good thing -- or even useful.
-brian
On 6/28/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/28/07, Bri
to enable translation from e.g. an SCA
(implementation.bpel) -> ODE JBI SU... right?
Gert
Brian O'Neill wrote:
> OK, per Guillaume's suggestion perhaps we start anew basing everything
> on 0.90 sca.
>
> So, what are peoples thoughts towards the design of the trans
The behavior of servicemix-components/http component and the
servicemix-http component appear to differ. Can someone explain the
difference between these two? Both appear to provide HTTP client/server
functionality.
In general, what is the status of the components under
servicemix-components
