Once we move everything to GShell, the geronimo.* scripts can be
deleted. Until then, allowing Unix/Linux/Mac users to install Geronimo
into paths with spaces outweighs the requirement for a very few if any
users who want to remove the jpa.jar to have to edit the script. We
could put more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-4389:
--
Assignee: Donald Woods
Can't start server when install it in a directory
platforms run Geronimo? Sun? IBM? OpenJDK? Other?
Donald Woods wrote:
Do we only build and certify Geronimo 2.2 on the Sun 1.6.0 JDK and
drop support for running on Java SE 5?
Pros:
- Reduce testing effort to one version of Java
- Allows us to use the JAXB 2.1, JAX-WS 2.1 and wsgen tools in the
JDK
using Java SE 5.
Using branch 2.1 may not be an option, as some of the
fixes/enhancement are not even avail in branch 2.1.
Lin
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The time has come to make the hard decision
much of a maintenance nightmare) then
we might consider it. Is that even possible?
Joe
Donald Woods wrote:
The time has come to make the hard decision -
Do we only build and certify Geronimo 2.2 on the Sun 1.6.0 JDK and
drop support for running on Java SE 5?
Pros:
- Reduce testing effort
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4389.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Rev712163 in branches/2.1 (2.1.4-SNAPSHOT)
Rev712164 in trunk (2.2
Expecting that we will have a 2.1.4 release sometime in 1Q09 and
probably a 2.1.5 sometime in 2H09 before we put the 2.1 branch to bed.
-Donald
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given we only
Yes, it will, but we ship bin/jpa.jar in all the minimal and jee5
assemblies, so if someone removes it, then they should expect something
like this to happen.
IMO - users with spaces in the path will be a more common occurrence
that those wanting to remove the jpa.jar and worth the change...
Just waiting for someone to finish the work in trunk to use GShell for
everything :-)
-Donald
Jason Dillon wrote:
Damn these scripts, I really think we should do away with them and use
gshell. Lets *document* the non-gshell ways to java -jar bin/server/jar
..etc... but only ship the
Think you're being over critical of Java SE 6 on MacOS.
I just took today's 2.1.4-SNAPSHOT build and it took the same 13 secs.
to start under 1.6.0_07 and 1.5.0_16 on my MacBook running OSX 10.5.5.
-Donald
Jason Dillon wrote:
On Nov 7, 2008, at 11:33 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I'm for
and will complete
October 30th, 2009, when J2SE 5.0 will have reached its End of Service
Life (EOSL).
If I was deploying new instances or updating existing app servers, I'd
require using Java SE 6 based on the above
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
The time has come to make the hard decision -
Do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4386.
--
Resolution: Fixed
will open a new JIRA for the ActiveMQ problem
rmi-naming should use
: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: ActiveMQ
Affects Versions: 2.1.3
Reporter: Donald Woods
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.1.4
Ron Staerker reported that if you change ServerHostname
to be the release
manager for 2.2 Donald. Is that correct? I can help as well if you
want to share the burden (and if nobody objects).
Joe
Donald Woods wrote:
OK, looks like we're making good progress towards a 2.2 release.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.2
The time has come to make the hard decision -
Do we only build and certify Geronimo 2.2 on the Sun 1.6.0 JDK and drop
support for running on Java SE 5?
Pros:
- Reduce testing effort to one version of Java
- Allows us to use the JAXB 2.1, JAX-WS 2.1 and wsgen tools in the JDK,
instead of
Thanks for the update, but please try to keep everyone in the loop (like
by creating a Doc Plan roadmap/todos/status under the 2.2 Roadmap
page) and work towards incremental updates, instead of infrequent drops
of large changes. By keeping everyone involved in planned doc changes,
you'll get
If you don't want this request to get lost, please open a JIRA and
assign the Fix versions to 2.1.4 and 2.2.
-Donald
Juergen Weber wrote:
Not worth a JIRA: I think, the default log4j ConversionPattern in
server-log4j.properties should be changed from ABSOLUTE to ISO8601 to have
complete
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reopened GERONIMO-4386:
Ron also discovered that the ActiveMQ connectors are not using
${ServerHostname
These are clean room implementations, right?
Also, does this provide the API and IMPL for JAXB?
-Donald
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've copied the jaxb 2.0 and 2.1 api to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jaxb_2.0_spec/
Sounds like a good feature to consider for 2.2.
Maybe we could offer it as an optional plugin, since the current zip/tar
files are per assembly, which means you would be including it for
Unix/Linux/Mac users too. It would also allow us to offer a JSW 3.2.0
(BSD licensed) version of the
Do we need to publish an updated 2.2-SNAPSHOT server build to the Apache
repo to resolve this?
-Donald
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi Ashish, you just need to build the trunk version of the server and it
will create the artifact that you're missing.
Ashish Jain wrote:
Hi,
I get the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4394:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.2
Assignee: Jack Cai
Assigning to Jack
Run Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4393:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.2
2.1.4
marking target fix versions
Duplicate Xid
BTW - Since you have a CLA on file, I just added your 2 ids (caijunj,
greensight) to the geronimo-contributor group in JIRA, which will allow
you to assign items to yourself to work on.
-Donald
Jack Cai wrote:
Hi all,
I learnt that some of our users are interested in running Geronimo as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12644271#action_12644271
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4387:
Ivan, is this patch for the pluins/mejb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4389:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Can't start server when install it in a directory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4389:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.2
Fix Version/s: 2.2
2.1.4
: dependencies
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Donald Woods
Assignee: Donald Woods
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.2
Upgrade all SLF4J artifacts from 1.5.0 to 1.5.5 to match the level of the just
added jul-to-slf4j jar.
--
This message is automatically
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4390.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Also had to rename org.slf4j.jc104l-over-slf4j to org.slf4j.jcl-over
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4389:
---
Assignee: (was: Donald Woods)
The patch didn't resolve the issue for me wen using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12644306#action_12644306
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4343:
Rev709433 - Upgraded to Genesis 1.5
: dependencies
Affects Versions: 2.1.3, 2.2
Reporter: Donald Woods
Assignee: Donald Woods
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.1.4, 2.2
Upgrade ant.jar from 1.7.0 to 1.7.1 to match the prior upgrade of ant-launcher
to 1.7.1.
--
This message is automatically
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4391.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Rev709461 in trunk (2.2-SNAPSHOT) - also included upgrade to released
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: core
Affects Versions: 2.1.3, 2.2
Reporter: Donald Woods
Assignee: Donald Woods
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.1.4, 2.2
The rmi-naming listening host
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4386.
--
Resolution: Fixed
checked into branches/2.1 (2.1.4-SNAPSHOT) and trunk (2.2-SNAPSHOT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12643492#action_12643492
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-527
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12643516#action_12643516
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4384:
Believe this is a duplicate of an older
+1
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
This is a vote for specs-parent 1.6.
The primary purpose for this release is to utilize the newly released
genesis 1.5 which included some enhancements to facilitate maven site
generation. There are also some minor changes in specs-parent to
facilitate maven
+1 from me.
-Donald
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In ServiceMix we have rewritten the JAXB specs jars (2.0 and 2.1)
because we needed to be able to do some modifications for OSGi.
We'd like to move them to the Geronimo Specs subproject as it would be
more consistent and would allow them to pass the
We ship both Dojo 0.4.3 and 1.1.1 in Geronimo 2.2 and we've been trying
to drop the old Dojo 0.4.3 usage for awhile, so please check-in the Dojo
1.1 version.
-Donald
Manu George wrote:
I have two versions of the EJB Portlet with me. One with dojo 0.4.3
and another with Dojo 1.x. There are
We should only be using Dojo 1.1.1 for any new portlet work going into 2.2.
-Donald
Manu George wrote:
I will commit the EJB Portlet next week once I am clear on which
version to put in. I have one suing 0.4 of dojo and another using 1.1
Regards
Manu
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Donald
I think releasing 2.0.3 is in the best interest of the community, given
the security fixes that it contains. It also gives us a way to announce
to our users that this will be the last 2.0.x release (which we never
really did for 1.1.x) and that they should start moving to 2.1.x or 2.2
for any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4368:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.4)
(was: 2.1.3)
OpenJPA can't find
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4368.
--
Resolution: Invalid
closing as invalid, as no code changes were required
OpenJPA can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reopened GERONIMO-4368:
reopening, as this should have been marked as canceled instead of fixed, as no
code
Has anyone heard if JPA 2.0 will be part of JEE6?
http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/xwiki/bin/view/Article/TestingJPA
If so, is Apache OpenJPA working on it?
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
FYI, here's an update on information on the expected Java EE 6 schedule
--
OK, looks like we're making good progress towards a 2.2 release.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.2+Release+Roadmap
Is everyone still thinking we can get 2.2 out this year (say branching
on 11/21 with a mid-December release target)?
Seems that the major items
Agree +1000.
Should this be considered the plan for 2.2?
-Donald
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Here are my thoughts on the switch to GShell:
-1 for geronimo.sh, and client.sh - the GShell alternatives start two
separate java processes: one for GShell env. and one for the server or
client container.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4299:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.2
2.1.3
Fix Version/s: 2.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4299.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Session invalidation problem - WADI Tomcat Clustering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
need ability to perform Custom Server Assembly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-526:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.2.0
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12641951#action_12641951
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-524:
---
Can you add
Which OS, JDK and Maven?
The 2.0 builds are using Maven 2.0.7 and Sun 1.5.0_16 on a Linux system.
It's been a week or so since I rebuilt branches/2.0, but the last I
tried it worked for me with a clean repo on openSUSE 11.0 and MacOSX.
-Donald
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hello all,
I know that
+1
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
This is a vote for Genesis 1.5.
Take 3:
In addition to take 1 take 2 this includes a more appropriate javadoc
max memory setting.
Take 2:
Same as take 1 except for replacing the hard-coded dependency on
geronimo-skin from 1.5-SNAPSHOT with 1.5 (this release).
Congrats Jason!
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
Please join us in congratulating Jason Warner as the newest member of
the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Jason working with us as a
committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us in providing
oversight of the Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4369:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.2
Fix Version/s: 2.2
added affects and target fix releases
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12641011#action_12641011
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4368:
Did you install the Postgresql driver
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12641109#action_12641109
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4324:
r706361 in trunk (2.2-SNAPSHOT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12641110#action_12641110
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4324:
r706363 in branches/2.1 (2.1.4-SNAPSHOT
Can these changes also be applied to branches/2.1?
-Donald
Lin Sun (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4370.
---
Resolution:
as
pluginInstallerGBean has changed a lot in trunk so I only checked the
code into trunk for now).
Lin
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good. That was the way I thought it was/should work.
-Donald
Lin Sun wrote:
Hi,
We provide source-repository in plugin metadata
Looks like you'll also have to release org.apache.geronimo.components
and we should probably upgrade to the latest released artifacts for
Javamail and any of the Specs
-Donald
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hello All,
Since I went ahead and opened my mouth... :)
Is there anyone who really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4324.
--
Resolution: Fixed
r706365 in branches/2.0 (2.0.3-SNAPSHOT)
Upgrade to MyFaces v1.2.4
Officially announcing that 2.0.3 will be the last planned 2.0 release
would be a good move and will help our users to start looking at using a
2.1.x release for new projects.
We'll also want to steer Eclipse users off of GEP 2.0.x and onto GEP
2.1.3, which still supports 2.0.x servers and
Jason W., was wondering if you have had a chance to run branches/2.1
(2.1.4-SNAPSHOT) through the TCK yet? There have been some changes that
have gone into 2.1 and trunk (like OpenJPA 1.2.0 and several WS JIRAs)
that it would be useful to see if everything still passes before we
start running
with the assemblage mechanism, if putting it in one
of the console-*modules, can it be in the dojo plugin folder ? Or may I
package it to the dojo-min-1.1.1.zip in the repository folder ?
2008/10/17 Donald Woods (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4366.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
If you want to include non-UTF8 chars in the XML file, then you need
In-line.
Joe Bohn wrote:
I've been making some changes to Genesis 1.5-SNAPSHOT to get maven site
generation working a little bit better and fix a few other things. All
of this is because there were still some maven site generation issues
after releasing samples. I think I have things
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12640290#action_12640290
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4366:
How were these non-ASCII chars
Dojo should only get pulled into a server assembly if one of the
installed pluginprofiles (or plugins) has a dependency on it.
BTW - the following file addition in the patch concerns me -
dojo/geronimo-dojo/src/main/appended-resources/dijit/form/GMessages.js
This dijit directory is created at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4365:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.2
2.1.4
add target fix releases
Pull in TranQL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12640293#action_12640293
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4353:
-1 on the 20081014 patch
Sounds good. That was the way I thought it was/should work.
-Donald
Lin Sun wrote:
Hi,
We provide source-repository in plugin metadata and default-repository
in plugin catalog.
Currently, (I think this is how it works) when we install a plugin
from a remote repo A, if the installation is
BTW - activeio is still listed as a dependency in the
activemq-core-5.1.0 pom.xml file and the activeio pom still lists
backport-util-concurrent as a dependency
-Donald
David Jencks (JIRA) wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12639840#action_12639840
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4337:
John, I just made a small update
I believe there are too many c-m-p and plugin/pluginprofile
changes/additions to warrant adding this into the 2.1 maintenance stream.
-Donald
Jack Cai wrote:
Hi Lin,
Can we create the framework plugin group for 2.1.x too if this does not
take too much? Thanks in advance!
Jack
2008/10/9
Yep, we need to fix this in 2.1.4.
Since we aren't moving over to gshell only commands until 2.2, we need
to fix the commands so they work as in 2.1.1 (instead of switching
completely over to gshell in a maintenance release.)
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Comments inline:
On
that
are currently in use.
Jay
Lin Sun wrote:
I think these two portlets are using the
dojo-legacy-tomcat/jetty6.
Nothing except the javaee5 assemblies lists dojo-tomcat/jetty6 as
dependency.
Lin
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Donald Woods
+1. IMO, site generation problems shouldn't hold-up the release.
-Donald
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for SAAJ 1.3 spec jar version 1.0.1. There was only one
change from version 1.0.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4289
Staging repo:
Doesn't seem worth holding up the release, given the problem existed before.
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
There are some issues with the maven generated site. These aren't new
problems and they are doc related ... so I'm not sure if they should
really hinder the spec release.
I just started
I'd like to see us generate a source + prebuilt artifacts (WAR/EAR +
deployment plans) as a downloadable assembly off our Downloads page.
Requiring users to checkout the Samples source from SVN is not friendly
to those that don't have a svn client installed (Windows and some
default Linux
Already started putting together a page in the GMOxPMGT space -
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Java+EE+6+Releases
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
FYI, here's an update on information on the expected Java EE 6 schedule
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12637992#action_12637992
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4226:
Sounds good.
GShell can
. custom server assemblies
2. G server assemblies (framework, javaee5)
3. install plugin group as regular plugin. For example, a user should
be able to install the JMS plugin group in little G to get little G +
JMS environment.
Lin
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that most of the functionality now delivered in the profilegroups
could have been implemented by just properly setting the plugin category
attribute to a useful plugin group name and use the source repo for the
plugin
Thanks. Can we get r701571, r701213 and 700249 (GD-379) from GEP trunk
included in GEP 2.1.4?
-Donald
Ted Kirby wrote:
I just copied GEP tags/2.1.3 to GEP braches/2.1.4 to create it. This
will be the development tree for GEP 2.1.4, to support G 2.1.4. GEP
trunk supports G 2.2, like the
I believe only the Debug Views and Plan Creator portlets need Dojo right
now, which I'm going to remove from the JEE5 assemblies and let users
optionally install them, once I've updated the Welcome portlet to
include some information about what optional Console plugins are
available
Why are we recreating the existing console-jetty and console-tomcat as
yet another plugin?
Also, why are you including optional console plugins like
activemq-console-xxx, which should only be included if the ActiveMQ
plugins are installed? By including it here, you're basically pulling
in
Don't we need to create a NOTICE file for the ianal plugin to append to
the auto generated LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt file inside each module/jar
that depends on the new CDDL libs?
-Donald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gawor
Date: Tue Oct 7 13:52:02 2008
New Revision: 702631
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reopened GERONIMO-4141:
Reopening till we verify that this is fixed on 2.1.x
The war exported as a geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4141:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.1.4)
(was: 2.2)
Fix
In-line below.
David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 3, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Jason Warner wrote:
Hey all. I'm working on an idea for allowing custom valves to be
defined in config.xml. Currently this isn't possible since the tomcat
classloader would not contain the custom classes for the valve.
Yep, was just doing a cut-n-paste. I'll update it. Thanks.
Joe Bohn wrote:
comment inline below.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dwoods
Date: Mon Oct 6 07:42:43 2008
New Revision: 702167
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=702167view=rev
Log:
add in private svn repo so plugin installs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12636719#action_12636719
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4328:
Wondering if this broke our assemblies
Just cleaned my source tree and tried to rebuild trunk on Linux and the
generated jetty6-javaee assembly doesn't have the /bin/ scripts set
executable and I'm getting testsuite startup failures due to
OK, I'm running into some geronimo-axis2 junit failures now (same as the
automated build) so I haven't got back to retrying my earlier build
failures
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
Just cleaned my source tree and tried to rebuild trunk on Linux and the
generated jetty6-javaee assembly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4225.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Updated Run SQL portlet code so it can be used on both the DB Manager
We don't re-release prior artifacts. To incorporate any new fixes,
you'd have to create a GEP 2.1.4 release.
BTW - There will be a 2.1.4 Server release sometime in 4Q08 or 1Q09, as
there have been several useful/important fixes since 2.1.3 and several
JIRAs that need to be addressed for
Yes, it mirrors the existing -DshittyTestExcludes that was already there...
You can continue using the other method, which I couldn't find
documented anywhere in the wiki
-Donald
Lin Sun wrote:
I have been using
mvn install -Dtests=console-testsuite/advanced
to run the individual
901 - 1000 of 2942 matches
Mail list logo
