Re: Support for multiple schema implementations in one response

Thanks guys, I ended up using the same object with one more field. On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 5:53 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Sure, openapi schema supports oneOf([1]) - but not all json clients so > take care. > Personally I would either propose you to merge the m

Support for multiple schema implementations in one response

Hello guys, I would like to know if there is a way with geronimo-openapi-plugin to generate the documentation for different classes in the same status code. I didn't tried different ways, but couldn't make it work. Any advise on this? Is this supported? @APIResponse( name = "badRequest", r

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-openapi-1.0.14

+1 thank you for this Romain On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:53 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.14. > Here is the changelog: > > 1–4 of 4View in Issue Navigator >

Re: Metrics issue

7 PM Cesar Hernandez wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Can you share the version of TomEE you were having this issue? > I want to double-check if was or not fixed on current master but I > couldn't reproduce the issue. > > El lun., 29 jul. 2019 a las 11:16, Ivan Junckes Filho (< >

Re: Metrics issue

Ok thanks Romain! On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 1:59 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > More likely refine them to exclude geronimo metrics common. Think it was > fixed on master though, not sure it got released. > > Le lun. 29 juil. 2019 à 18:07, Ivan Junckes Filho > a écrit : >

Re: Metrics issue

at 1:02 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Ivan > > Looks like a tomee config issue, common module shouldnt be scanned, can > you check your exclusion list? > > Le lun. 29 juil. 2019 à 17:47, Ivan Junckes Filho > a écrit : > >> Hey guys, there is an interesting is

Metrics issue

Hey guys, there is an interesting issue happening with metrics in tomee. When I can /metrics in the tomee runnning in my localhost wihout docker I am able to access /metrics endpoint. But in the environment that I use docker to run TomEE I get the issue below on calling /metrics. Anybody can help

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.8

+1 On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:57 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 29/04/2019 09:41, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > here is the vote for Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.8. This is mainly for a few > > fixes/enhancement and to enable CXF to upgrade: > >

Re: OpenTracing Zipkin

l. > > Le lun. 15 avr. 2019 à 20:36, Ivan Junckes Filho > a écrit : > >> Romain I was actually using this docker-compose from JL as reference, but >> wasn't able to make it work. >> >> I will have a look at it again this week, if I have improvement I will >

Re: OpenTracing Zipkin

Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Ivan > > Did you debug ZipkinHttp? > > Depending your server/app config you can need some config like providers > etc. This class is a good start to check what is happening. > > A good config start is > > https://github.com/jeanouii/micr

OpenTracing Zipkin

Hey guys I am having a hard time to setup TomEE with OpenTracing 1.0.2 + Zipkin. When I send the payload to the zipkin API http://localhost:9411/api/v2/spans, I keep getting back: 400 - "Expected a JSON_V2 encoded list, but received: JSON_V1" My payload is: [ { "annotations": [ {

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.7

+1 On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:30 AM Daniel Cunha wrote: > +1 > > > Em sex, 29 de mar de 2019 às 08:31, Raymond Auge > escreveu: > >> +1 >> >> - Ray >> >> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019, 04:54 Romain Manni-Bucau, >> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Here is the vote for our microprofile openapi implementatio

Re: OpenAPI and tags

+1 On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:32 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > Seems we were not generating valid openapi.json in some cases when tags > were set (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6716) > > I propose to run a release tomorrow if there is no objection and pending > wor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.6

+1 On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 5:32 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 25/02/2019 08:51, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Here is the vote for our openapi+microprofile integration impl 1.0.6. > > > > Staging repo is available > > at > https://repo

Re: Release train?

Hi Romain, I would love if the schema changes and the "in" ticket from openapi are in this M3 release, is that possible? On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 11:53 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, several users asked for some release in MP land, anything you are > working on or would like in? I will l

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6695) OpenAPI - Schemas are not working properly with a few issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16774079#comment-16774079 ] Ivan Junckes Filho commented on GERONIMO-6695: -- Do you think this

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6695) OpenAPI - Schemas are not working properly with a few issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773390#comment-16773390 ] Ivan Junckes Filho commented on GERONIMO-6695: -- Now it works, th

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6695) OpenAPI - Schemas are not working properly with a few issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773200#comment-16773200 ] Ivan Junckes Filho commented on GERONIMO-6695: -- [~romain.manni-bucau

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6695) OpenAPI - Schemas are not working properly with a few issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772350#comment-16772350 ] Ivan Junckes Filho commented on GERONIMO-6695: -- I am trying to buil

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6695) OpenAPI - Schemas are not working properly with a few issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan Junckes Filho updated GERONIMO-6695: - Attachment: image-2019-02-19-18-27-41-292.png > OpenAPI - Schemas are

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6695) OpenAPI - Schemas are not working properly with a few issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772160#comment-16772160 ] Ivan Junckes Filho commented on GERONIMO-6695: -- [~romain.manni-b

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6695) OpenAPI - Schemas are not working properly with a few issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan Junckes Filho updated GERONIMO-6695: - Description: 1 - Name of classes are not user friendly 2 - Internal system

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6695) OpenAPI - Schemas are not working properly with a few issues

Ivan Junckes Filho created GERONIMO-6695: Summary: OpenAPI - Schemas are not working properly with a few issues Key: GERONIMO-6695 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695

Re: "In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

cated": false, "exclusiveMaximum": false, "exclusiveMinimum": false, "maxLength": 2147483647, "minLength": 0, "nullable": false, "readOnly": false, "type": &qu

Re: "In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

One thing I saw happening too, is when I add the annotation below it doesn't get added to openapi. @RequestBody(content = @Content(schema = @Schema(implementation = Sms.class))) Is that because it is under development? On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:38 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >

Re: "In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

Looks like it is fixed in the master, but when I get the lib and add to tomee it shows some bad behavior with the schemas. [image: image.png] On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:09 AM Ivan Junckes Filho wrote: > No I didn't, I will have a look. thanks > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:08 A

Re: "In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

No I didn't, I will have a look. thanks On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:08 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Did you test on the snapshot? we got some enhancements about it. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > &

Re: @OpenAPIDefinition not working

It didn't seem to work for me adding the property to system.properties. Any ideas what I am doing wrong? On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:21 AM Roberto Cortez wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Yes Romain is right, you should set openejb.cxf-rs.cache-application = > false and it should work. We ha

"In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

Hey guys, I think there is an issue with parameters as the "in" property is required by the spec and is not showing up. This affects swagger-ui as it doesn't replace uf by the actual value. Anyone aware of this issue? { "openapi": "3.0.1", "paths": { "/test/{uf}": { "get": {

Re: @OpenAPIDefinition not working

velopment/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 19:01, Ivan Junckes Filho a > écrit : > > > Interesting, ok thanks Romain. > > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 3:29 PM Romain Manni-Bucau > > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Ivan,

Re: @OpenAPIDefinition not working

Interesting, ok thanks Romain. On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 3:29 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > In a few cases - don't recall out of my head if it is all - TomEE wraps > user application in InternalApplication. IIRC it was for caching reason - > TomEE not being supe

@OpenAPIDefinition not working

The @OpenAPIDefinition is not being picked up by the CDI extension because it is only getting InternalApplication instead of picking up my custom Application config. Any ideas why? OpenAPIDefinition configs are therefore not showing up in the openapi doc. @OpenAPIDefinition(info = @Info(

MP RestClient issue DuplicateDefinitionException

Hey guys, I need help with rest client in TomEE. I am deploying in the same server 2 apps. app1 -> Has the client interfaces, but I exclude from the war. app2 -> Has the client interfaces from app1 in a jar. I deploy app1 and app2 in the same server and I get the DuplicateDefinitionException.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5 released

Thanks Romain! On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 2:33 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > The Apache Geronimo team is happy to announce the Apache Geronimo OpenAPI > 1.0.5 > release. > > It brings several fixes in the generated openapi model. > > You can more on Apache Geronimo OpenAPI and more generally the >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5

+1 thanks Romain On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:38 PM Raymond Auge wrote: > +1 > > - Ray > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:25 AM Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> As requested last week, here is the Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5 vote. >> >> Staging repo can be found at >> https://repositor

Re: OpenAPI integration with metrics/health

;http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le ven. 25 janv. 2019 à 15:18, Iva

Re: OpenAPI integration with metrics/health

AM Ivan Junckes Filho wrote: > Thanks Romain, I will have a look. > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:41 AM Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > >> You can use: >> >> void start(@Observes @intiialzed(ApplicationScoped.class) Object event, >> final GeronimoOpen

Re: OpenTracing - nullpointer OpenTracingFilter

Good news, this is not happening in the master. I will close the ticket and wait for the release. On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:16 AM Ivan Junckes Filho wrote: > This is the ticket: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2457 > > This looks like a release blocker in my opinion.

Re: OpenTracing - nullpointer OpenTracingFilter

This is the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2457 This looks like a release blocker in my opinion. I will check the master and see how it behaves. On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:53 PM Roberto Cortez wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Can you please provide a test case that repro

Re: OpenTracing - nullpointer OpenTracingFilter

ps://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le mar. 22 janv. 2019 à 15:37, Ivan Junckes Filho > a écrit : > >> I would say if the extens

Re: OpenTracing - nullpointer OpenTracingFilter

I would say if the extension was not executed for some reason that we need to know why, we need to make sure the filter doesn't throw that exception or completely ignore the filter logic right? On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:08 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > This means t

OpenTracing - nullpointer OpenTracingFilter

Hey guys, I would like some help with an opentracing issue. I am not sure if it was already fixed or not. It was happening on version 1.0.0, current M1 release of TomEE 8. There is a nullpointer happening in OpenTracingFilter and it seems to be because this injection is null. @Inject private Gero

Re: OpenAPI integration with metrics/health

Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le ven. 18 janv. 2019 à

Re: OpenAPI integration with metrics/health

Cool I will have a look next week. Can you point out which event is it? On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 1:52 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > > Le jeu. 17 janv. 2019 à 16:49, Ivan Junckes Filho > a écrit : > >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:11 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < >

Re: OpenAPI integration with metrics/health

> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le jeu. 17 janv. 2019 à 14:49, Ivan Junckes Filho > a écrit : > >> Hey guys, I was trying to make the openapi document generated by >> geronimo-openapi to work with swagger-ui.

OpenAPI integration with metrics/health

Hey guys, I was trying to make the openapi document generated by geronimo-openapi to work with swagger-ui. The issue is I can't execute requests from swagger-ui in the endpoints generated (metrics, health, openapi) by TomEE as they don't have a @ApiResponse annotation and swagger-ui doesn't display

Re: Geronimo OpenAPI maven plugin coming changes

e issue you are soeaking about? Or did you find another case - i > know with some ioc lib proxies can swallow annotation but i guess you > tested on tomee so it should be fine? > > Le mer. 9 janv. 2019 18:38, Ivan Junckes Filho a > écrit : > >> Hey Romain, when you say info are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Microprofile Aggregator 1.0.1

+1 On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 09/01/2019 14:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Here is the annouced vote for our microprofile aggregator project. Here > > are the fixed issues: > > > > P T Key

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.4 (take 2 - enum fix included)

+1 On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 09/01/2019 14:09, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > We already have a few fixes which can be blocker for some users so i'd > > like to release our MP openapi impl. Here are the

Re: Geronimo OpenAPI maven plugin coming changes

Hey Romain, when you say info are you talking about the annotations below? I was planning to open an issue to have that information in the open api document. Is this the same issue? @OpenAPIDefinition(info = @Info(title = "App Name", version = "1.0")) On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 7:47 AM Romain Mann

Re: Ability for my changes to go in

y and offer a ticket for me to work on. That was nice of you! On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 4:19 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Ivan > > Indeed it does but fix was quite straight forward and i was planning a > release on sunday - but got some "box" issues on saturday and a

Ability for my changes to go in

Hey Romain, I see your comments with feedback in the PR I opened, thank you for that. I had a busy weekend and couldn't reply immediately. https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/4 But I saw also in the PR that there were some conflicts and the change was incorporated in the master differe

Re: TOMEE-2289

FYI I opened a PR on geronimo to fix the issue with text/html. https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/4 Postman was working because it used */* and the implementation was properly handling it, but not handling text/html. On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 2:34 PM Ivan Junckes Filho wrote: >

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6670) Content-type text/html is returning error on /open

Ivan Junckes Filho created GERONIMO-6670: Summary: Content-type text/html is returning error on /open Key: GERONIMO-6670 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6670 Project

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.3

+1 On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 6:30 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 02.01.2019 um 16:10 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > as mentionned here is the vote fore Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.3 to ensure we > don't need jackson when using it > > > > The staging r

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Metrics 1.0.2

+1 On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 6:39 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 02.01.2019 um 16:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > As mentionned here is the vote for Geronimo Metrics 1.0.2 to ensure > sigar extension does not register twice the same filesyste

Re: Microprofile OpenAPI

rofile lib. > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:25 AM Ivan Junckes Filho > > wrote: > > > The goal for this is to implement Microprofile Specifications. So what > the > > Microprofile community decides is important and needs to be followed. Of > > course everyone ha

Re: Microprofile OpenAPI

what the standard is and change later if the community decides so. On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:14 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > I don't understand why you say so Ivan, it is perfectly compatible. > > Also to answer clearly to your question: I prefer to have an impl not > compat

Re: Microprofile OpenAPI

tps://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le ven. 30 nov. 2018 à 16:51, Ivan Junckes Filho > a écrit : > >> @Romain Manni-Bucau not sure I understood you. >> Are you saying you

Re: Microprofile OpenAPI

m decides, we need to make > > it work as the specification says. Then iterate from there. > > In my opinion this is a big problem that makes us strongly incompatible > > with the standard. > > > +1 > > El vie., 30 nov. 2018 a las 5:44, Ivan Junckes Filho (&l

Re: [jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6658) Issue @Gauge Accept: application/json

ache Git Service. > To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the > URL above to go to the specific comment. > > For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: > us...@infra.apache.org > > > > Issue @Gauge Accept: application/json > > -

Re: Microprofile OpenAPI

gt;>> one. > >>> > >>> If you wanted to explicitly request a YAML response, I'd expect one of > >>> these to work: > >>> > >>> Accept: application/x-yaml > >>> Accept: text/yaml > >>> > >>> I

Re: Microprofile OpenAPI

8:07, Bruno Baptista a > écrit : > >> Hi Romain, >> >> Independent of the implementation details, if we have to specify the >> accept header with "text/yaml", the response in not *yaml by default* >> like the spec says... right? >> >> Iva

Re: Microprofile OpenAPI

Hey Romain, take a look on: https://download.eclipse.org/microprofile/microprofile-open-api-1.0/microprofile-openapi-spec.html#_content_format It is clear for me there, that the default should be yaml. On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 2:58 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hello Ivan, > >

Microprofile OpenAPI

Hey guys, I think I found a bug in OpenAPI implementation. The spec says: "The default format of the /openapi endpoint is YAML." But when I try to access /openapi it returns JSON by default. This is not correct. Also how can I access yaml if it is not default?

Write tests geronimo

Hello guys, I did a change on Geronimo Metrics. https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2 geronimo-metrics, as you are aware, is a library used in TomEE. I am wondering how can I write a test for my change. Writing a test in TomEE for this is very simple, but writing a test in geronimo I

Re: Metrics Gauge Example and Bug

ovider. > > The fix should be just to replace one with another. Let me try it and test. > > Cheers, > Roberto > > On 23 Nov 2018, at 12:06, Ivan Junckes Filho > wrote: > > I was using the current master. > > 1.1.9 > > I will try to use the version Romai

Re: Metrics Gauge Example and Bug

ot sure what is wrong. I remember seeing that > before and I think it got fixed when we added the JsonB JAX-RS Provider. > Maybe there is a regression in some place. > > Cheers, > Roberto > > > On 22 Nov 2018, at 21:08, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > > >

Re: Metrics Gauge Example and Bug

Also there are a lot of properties being returned on that payload that are not needed like rate1, rate5... etc. On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 6:26 PM Ivan Junckes Filho wrote: > The issue with the TCK is because meter in the spec expects fifteenMinRate > instead of fifteenMinuteRate. > >

Re: Metrics Gauge Example and Bug

The issue with the TCK is because meter in the spec expects fifteenMinRate instead of fifteenMinuteRate. Same apply for the other properties like fiveMin..oneMin.. @JsonbProperty("fifteenMinRate") is probably being ignored. On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 5:46 PM Ivan Junckes Filho wro

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6658) Issue @Gauge Accept: application/json

Ivan Junckes Filho created GERONIMO-6658: Summary: Issue @Gauge Accept: application/json Key: GERONIMO-6658 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6658 Project: Geronimo

Re: Metrics Gauge Example and Bug

me know. On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 7:59 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Ivan > > It is a bug in tomee scanning I think > > > Le mer. 21 nov. 2018 21:35, Ivan Junckes Filho a > écrit : > > > Hey guys, I was writing an example of metrics gauge (WIP). > >

Metrics Gauge Example and Bug

Hey guys, I was writing an example of metrics gauge (WIP). https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/213 And I found a bug when trying access a gauge with "Accept: application/json". Just to let you know that I will work on a fix for this: 21-Nov-2018 17:24:08.811 WARNING [http-nio-8080-exec-4] org.

Re: Re: TomEE8 RC2: MP Metrics @Counted throws 500

lavor wrote: > Hello Ivan Junckes Filho, > https://www.morebeer.com/category/kit-week.html?ref=2C > > Cheers > > Mike Albrecht > Customer Service Representative > MoreFlavor! Inc. > 1-800-600-0033 > > On Tue, Nov 20 at 3:28 AM , Ivan Junckes Filho > wrote: > H

Re: TomEE8 RC2: MP Metrics @Counted throws 500

Hey Cesar, I was able to make it work with my example. Take a look there I found a bug with geronimo-metrics-1.0.0 throwing a null pointer when the app metric is not found instead of returning a blank page. I am not sure if it happens in master. I will be looking into it. On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at

Re: TomEE8 RC2: MP Metrics @Counted throws 500

Hey guys, I also had the same issue here. The application metrics do not work. Base and Vendor metrics are fine. I am troubleshooting to see if I can find the issue. I will let you know if I find something. Please if you already had the chance to look into this let me know. On Tue, Oct 16, 2018

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Validation 2.0 (spec) v1.0

+1 On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:02 AM Roberto Cortez wrote: > +1 > > On 30 Sep 2018, at 16:38, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > Hi guys, > > To enable BVal and TomEE releases, I'd like to release our validation spec > bundle. > > Here is the staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repo

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

spec-1.0/ > > [+1] ship it > [+0] meh, don't care > [-1] nope, because ${reason} > > Here is my +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > -- Ivan

Re: [VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2

t; Cheers, > Guillaume > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > > -- Ivan

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6488) Use GEronimoClassLoader for classloader injection for GBeans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan updated GERONIMO-6488: --- Attachment: geronimo-kernel-3.0.1.jar GERONIMO-6488.patch > Use GEronimoClassLoa

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6488) Use GEronimoClassLoader for classloader injection for GBeans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13747448#comment-13747448 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-6488: I attached a patched jar file, you may replace

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6488) Use GEronimoClassLoader for classloader injection for GBeans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan updated GERONIMO-6488: --- Component/s: core Description: To support jar url classloader, originally, we had

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6488) Use GEronimoClassLoader for classloader injection for GBeans

Ivan created GERONIMO-6488: -- Summary: Use GEronimoClassLoader for classloader injection for GBeans Key: GERONIMO-6488 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6488 Project: Geronimo

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6486) @Resource SessionContext is not working

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan resolved GERONIMO-6486. Resolution: Not A Problem JIRA system is mostly for defects only, not asking questions. If you found

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6486) @Resource SessionContext is not working

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13742931#comment-13742931 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-6486: I did not see any jar files are required to sup

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6487) @Resource SessionContext is not working in Geronimo 3.0.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan resolved GERONIMO-6487. Resolution: Cannot Reproduce JIRA system is mostly for defects only, not asking questions. If you found

Re: Geronimo.Axis2 NullPointerException GeronimoFactoryRegistry

at > org.apache.axis2.jaxws.server.ServiceInstanceFactoryImpl.createServiceInstance(ServiceInstanceFactoryImpl.java:48) > > at > org.apache.axis2.jaxws.server.EndpointController.handleRequest(EndpointController.java:247) > > ... 39 more > > > > I use geronimo version 2.2.1 and geronimo.axis2 version is also 2.2.1. > > It seems like GeronimoFactoryRegistry is never set and therefore it's null > and causes this exception. I have virtual hosts setup with geronimo can > that have something to do with this? Or is this caused because I am missing > something from my geronimo setup? > > > Thanks in advance! > > > -- Ivan

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Jarek Gawor has been appointed as the the PMC Chair of the Geronimo Project

, to all the PMC members, committers, contributors, and users -- > thanks for making my job as PMC chair so easy and enjoyable. It's been a > pleasure working with you. > > --kevan -- Ivan

Re: Query About Apache Geronimo

better to solve this. > > Thanks > > -- > > G.Subrahmanyam, > +91-8867111831 > > -- Ivan

Re: JDK 7 Classloading Behavior Change

earch the ext loader (in addition to the >> boot loader) on boot delegated loads. >> >> I'm wondering if there should be a more permanent fix... here are a few >> suggestions: >> 1) Work with the JDK teams to revert back to the old behavior - I have a >> ticket open with JDK support, but they apparently moved the com.sun.* >> classes to the ext loader for a security issue, so it may be a hard sell to >> get them to move it back. >> 2) Update the default system.properties to include >> osgi.parentClassloader=ext >> 3) Modify the ClassLoaderHook's getBundleClassLoaderParent() method to >> return the ext loader ( ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader().getParent() ). >> >> If #1 is not an option, then I think I like optino #2 better than #3, as >> it allows users to change it easily if they want a different behavior. >> >> Does anybody have strong opinions? Or other suggestions? >> >> Thanks, Andy >> > > -- Ivan

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6473) el_2.2 spec pass index of vararg not the real params

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13696866#comment-13696866 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-6473: Seems that this has been fixed in GERONIMO-

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6473) el_2.2 spec pass index of vararg not the real params

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan resolved GERONIMO-6473. Resolution: Duplicate Fix Version/s: 1.x > el_2.2 spec pass index of vararg not the r

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6475) Legacy JNDI context usage support

Ivan created GERONIMO-6475: -- Summary: Legacy JNDI context usage support Key: GERONIMO-6475 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6475 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security

Legacy JNDI support ?

gic in our DefaultInitialContextFactoryBuilder. I would prefer the option b, considering the logic is so simple, and there is no need to import another jar file, also, we may not suffer the potential ordering issue, since the current DefaultInitialContextFactoryBuilder will always return one context instance. Thoughts ? -- Ivan

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6469) EJB annotations are not working in Geronimo 3.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan resolved GERONIMO-6469. Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Assignee: Ivan Nayela, I went ahead to change this as could not

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6471) IllegalStateException : Cause already initialized is thrown while mail provider failed to connect or sent the messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan resolved GERONIMO-6471. Resolution: Fixed > IllegalStateException : Cause already initialized is thrown while m

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6471) IllegalStateException : Cause already initialized is thrown while mail provider failed to connect or sent the messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13675527#comment-13675527 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-6471: Commit the changes to trunk at rev. 148

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6471) IllegalStateException : Cause already initialized is thrown while mail provider failed to connect or sent the messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan updated GERONIMO-6471: --- Affects Version/s: (was: 3.0.2) Fix Version/s: 3.0.2 > IllegalStateException : Ca

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6471) IllegalStateException : Cause already initialized is thrown while mail provider failed to connect or sent the messages

Ivan created GERONIMO-6471: -- Summary: IllegalStateException : Cause already initialized is thrown while mail provider failed to connect or sent the messages Key: GERONIMO-6471 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo devtools maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2 release

eronimo/devtools/maven-plugins/tags/maven-plugins-1.2/ >> >> NOTE: please build it with maven 2.2.1 and Java 6. >> >> Vote will be at most open for 72 hours. >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> >> -- >> Thanks! >> >> Regards, Forrest >> > > > > -- > Shawn > -- Ivan

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >