Re: Batchee coming release 1.0.1

+1 Regards JB > Le 26 oct. 2021 à 10:07, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi all, > > I pushed a few changes on BatchEE, highlights are: > > 1. drop of cxf 2 client support (think it is way overdue) > 2. adding basic spring-boot batchee UI integration > > I'd like to release it, any

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1

Good point, I think the release should be reset. Regards JB > Le 11 oct. 2021 à 17:28, Francois Papon a > écrit : > > Hi, > > I'm not sure to understand, we moved the source repository from svn to gitbox > for javamail so for me it's a -1. > > Can you do the release from gitbox? > >

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Hi Mark, I guess you mean for the release ? If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s what I’m doing at ServiceMix). But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less convenient anyway). Regards JB > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Hi, No objection from my side. Regards JB > Le 11 mai 2021 à 05:39, fpa...@apache.org a écrit : > > Hi, > > I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project > repositories from svn to gitbox. > > > I think we can start with this projects: > > -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BatchEE 1.0.0

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 8 mai 2021 à 09:51, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > hi lords and ladies! > > I want to call a VOTE on releasing Apache BatchEE 1.0.0 > This is mainly an update to JavaEE8 and a few bug fixes. > > We fixed the following tickets. > > Bug > > [BATCHEE-126

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache xBean-4.20

+1 (binding) Thanks Mark ! Regards JB > Le 7 mai 2021 à 10:22, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > hiho! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing xbean-4.20. > > The only change is to switch back to a dependency-reduced pom. > 4.18 und 4.19 did leak the shaded ASM dependencies down to consumers.

Re: BATCHEE release?

No problem for me. Regards JB > Le 28 avr. 2021 à 08:54, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > while coming along, I'd also update BATCHEE to fit EE8 and update to > 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. > Any objections? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > On Wednesday, 28 April 2021, 08:44:08 CEST, Francois Papon > wrote: >

Re: BATCHEE release?

+1 for the release. No objection. Regards JB > Le 28 avr. 2021 à 07:13, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > hi folks! > > I'd like to do a BATCHEE release soon. > Anything you want to work on then ping me. > > txs and LieGrue, > strub >

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Bean 4.19 release

ean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > I submit XBean 4.19 to your vote. > > This release especially includes: > - Upgrade to ASM 9.1 > - Fix a NPE when the superclass is not set in the bundle finder > - Fix OSGi headers in asm9 shaded artifa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bean 4.19 release

Casting my own +1 (binding) ;) Regards JB > Le 13 avr. 2021 à 07:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > I submit XBean 4.19 to your vote. > > This release especially includes: > - Upgrade to ASM 9.1 > - Fix a NPE when the superclass is not set i

[VOTE] Apache Bean 4.19 release

Hi everyone, I submit XBean 4.19 to your vote. This release especially includes: - Upgrade to ASM 9.1 - Fix a NPE when the superclass is not set in the bundle finder - Fix OSGi headers in asm9 shaded artifact Release Notes:

Release XBean 4.19

Hi guys, As XBEAN-326 is impacting several projects (Pax Web, Karaf, ActiveMQ, …), especially when using Jackson 2.12.x, I would like to release xbean 4.19. I have some minor dependency updates but it’s ready: I tested 4.19-SNAPSHOT and it fixes the NPE issue. No objection ? Thanks, Regards

Re: XBean github mirror open issue for sync update

b.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > Le mar. 9 mars 2021 à 14:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit : > Hi, > > Thanks. > > Just a quick question: I would like to fix the OSGi headers. Should I create > a PR o

Re: XBean github mirror open issue for sync update

Hi, Thanks. Just a quick question: I would like to fix the OSGi headers. Should I create a PR or just push directly ? Regards JB > Le 9 mars 2021 à 14:54, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi all, > > Just to let you know, I opened an issue to ensure our github mirror is > synchronized for

Re: MP Config implementation and interpolations

Agree for "clean interpolation" and add a flag to be spec compliant. Regards JB > Le 13 févr. 2021 à 10:07, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi all, > > Seems our list injection supports interpolation of values whereas plain value > (String, primitives, ...) don't until you use a converter.

Re: Modernizing geronimo-transaction

Hi Florent, Maybe we can start with a set of Jira or discussion on the mailing list. I think it makes sense to move forward on geronimo-transaction and prepare a new release. Thanks ! Regards JB > Le 11 févr. 2021 à 22:50, Florent Guillaume a écrit : > > Hi, > > Is there any interest in

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Arthur 1.0.2

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 11 févr. 2021 à 12:16, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi all, > > I'd like to release Arthur 1.0.2 as mentionned on the list. > It is only about ensuring our maven plugin resolves knights properly: > > GERONIMO-6803

Re: Release arthur 1.0.2 soon?

Thanks, I will take a look ! Regards JB > Le 8 févr. 2021 à 17:12, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Anyone able to test GERONIMO-6803 before we release arthur 1.0.2? > I'd love to release it with this fix but a second pair of eyes would be > welcomed. > To test you need to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.1

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 8 janv. 2021 à 12:40, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi all, > > I'd like to release Arthur 1.0.1. > > Here is the changelog: > > T Patch Info Key Summary AssigneeReporterP > Status Resolution Created Updated Due

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-openapi-1.0.14

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 30 nov. 2020 à 11:53, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.14. > Here is the changelog: > > 1–4 of 4View in Issue Navigator >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo BatchEE 0.6

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 12 nov. 2020 à 12:39, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi all, > > Here is the vote for batchee 0.6. > Here is the changelog: > > 1–14 of 14View in Issue Navigator >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo JWT Auth 1.0.4

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 11 nov. 2020 à 21:53, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for our JWT Auth implementation v 1.0.4. > > The issues are: > > GERONIMO-6757 Changes to > make geronimo-jwt-auth work

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Simple JCache 1.0.5

+1 (binding) Thanks Regards JB > Le 10 nov. 2020 à 18:10, Francois Papon a > écrit : > > +1 (non-binding) > > thanks! > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org > Le 10/11/2020 à 15:36, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : >> Hi everyone, >> >> Here is the vote for

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-openapi-1.0.13

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 16 oct. 2020 à 15:20, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > > > Hi! > > Here is the staging repo > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1132/ > > > > > source

Re: jira ticket mess

Hi, What about generalizing use of fix version containing the "target" project (and we do for openapi or metrics) ? I think both component + fix version would be enough to clearly identify release content/release notes. Regards JB > Le 16 oct. 2020 à 13:34, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > hi

Re: [VOTE] geronimo jsonp, jsonb, security, validation releases

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 15 oct. 2020 à 22:38, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > Hi! > > I want to call a VOTE on releasing > > > geronimo-json_1.1_spec-1.5 > geronimo-jsonb_1.0_spec-1.4 > geronimo-security_1.0_spec-1.1 > geronimo-validation_2.0_spec-1.1 > > The only difference to the

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec api version 1.3

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 15 oct. 2020 à 19:40, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > Hi! > > I want to call a VOTE on releasing > geronimo-jcdi_2.0 1.3 > > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1130/ >

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jcdi_1.0 and 1.1 spec jars

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 15 oct. 2020 à 19:37, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > Hi! > > I want to call a VOTE on releasing > geronimo-jcdi_1.0-1.1 and > geronimo-jcdi_1.1-1.1 > > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1129/ >

Re: [DISCUSS] release a few specs

+1 Regards JB > Le 15 oct. 2020 à 12:37, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > hi! > > I'd love to release a few specs today. They do not have any API changes but > are important nonetheless: > > The following 3 specs did get an important fix against a ClassCastException >

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.0

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 13 oct. 2020 à 16:59, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.0 > > Here is the staging repo > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1127 >

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo JavaMail Impl and Provider 1.0.0 for javamail spec 1.6

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 13 oct. 2020 à 17:07, Raymond Auge a écrit : > > +1 > > - Ray > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:04 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > wrote: > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the Geronimo JavaMail Impl and Provider for > javamail spec 1.6 > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo XBean 4.18

Just note: Karaf test is confirmed but I did a mistake about winegrower. Doing a new run. Regards JB > Le 21 sept. 2020 à 08:36, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > > By the way, tested without problem in Winegrower and Karaf. > > Regards > JB > >> Le 21 sept.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo XBean 4.18

By the way, tested without problem in Winegrower and Karaf. Regards JB > Le 21 sept. 2020 à 08:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > >> Le 21 sept. 2020 à 08:21, Romain Manni-Bucau > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.c

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo XBean 4.18

+1 (non binding) Regards JB > Le 21 sept. 2020 à 08:21, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for xbean 4.18 which provides asm9 shade. > > Here is the tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.18/ >

Re: xbean asm 9

werx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> > | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > Le mer

Re: xbean asm 9

+1 it sounds good to me. Regards JB > Le 16 sept. 2020 à 11:38, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Upgraded our asm shade to asm 9 (beta for now). > > If there is no issue, I'm planning to release it soon, please let me know if > anything is blocking. > > Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: [PROPOSAL] - website

It sounds good ! Regards JB > Le 8 mai 2020 à 23:38, Francois Papon a écrit : > > Hi, > > I would like to make a proposal about the Geronimo website > (https://geronimo.apache.org). > > I think the actual website can be simplified because as the Geronimo > application server is no longer

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Specs JCDI_2.0 1.2, Annotation_1.3 1.3, AtInject_1.0 1.2, Interceptor_1.2 1.2, JSONP_1.1 1.4, JSONB_1.0 1.3

+1 (non binding) Regards JB > Le 28 avr. 2020 à 07:59, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for some of our spec with jakarta shades. > > Tags: > - > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec-1.2/ > >

Re: Jakarta artifacts?

+1 It sounds good. I can also help about the shading. Regards JB > Le 28 avr. 2020 à 07:37, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Should we release jakarta artifacts? > Short term I'm just expecting a shade added to the default artifact since for > now it is 1-1 and for jakarta9

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo XBean 4.17

+1 (non binding) Regards JB > Le 27 avr. 2020 à 16:47, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for xbean 4.17 which provides asm8 shade. > > Here is the tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.17/ >

Re: Asm 8

It sounds good to me. No objection. Regards JB > Le 27 avr. 2020 à 15:49, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hello everyone, > > should we do asm8 release? > do we keep the xbean-asm8 (+ package) pattern? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog >

Re: MetricRegistry impl

It sounds good, thanks ! Regards JB > Le 16 avr. 2020 à 14:59, Francois Papon a > écrit : > > Hi, > > I pushed a PR to override the default methods of the MetricRegistry > implementation. > The default methods will be removed from the specs in the next release. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Metrics 3.0-M2

+1 (non binding) Regards JB > Le 13 avr. 2020 à 17:22, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi all, > > Here is the vote for our Microprofile Metrics implementation. > It brings our compliance to v3.0-M2 spec and also provides jars without jaxrs > part of the impl. > > Tag: >

Re: [VOTE] release Apache JPA-2.2 spec v1.1

+1 (non binding) Regards JB > Le 14 mars 2020 à 08:53, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > Good morning! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache Geronimo JPA-2.2 spec API in > version 1.1. > This is a maintenance release with just the automatic module name added in > the manifest file. > >

Re: Release simple jcache soon?

It sounds good to me. Regards JB > Le 13 févr. 2020 à 18:20, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi all, > > I just activated bundle plugin to generate a manifest to enable to use our > simple jcache impl in OSGi. > Any issue if we release it something like next week? > >