Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.1

+1 - Ray On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:49 AM Francois Papon wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > regards, > > Françoisfpa...@apache.org > > Le 08/01/2021 à 12:40, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi all, > > I'd like to release Arthur 1.0.1. > > Here is the changelog: > > T Patch Info Key Summary

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo BatchEE 0.6

+1 - Ray On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:47 AM Francois Papon wrote: > Nice! > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks Romain! > > regards, > > Françoisfpa...@apache.org > > Le 12/11/2020 à 12:39, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi all, > > Here is the vote for batchee 0.6. > Here is the changelog: > > 1–14

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo JWT Auth 1.0.4

+1 - Ray On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 3:53 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for our JWT Auth implementation v 1.0.4. > > The issues are: > > [image: Major][image: Bug]GERONIMO-6757 > Changes to make >

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jwt-auth-1.0.4

I'm pretty sure everything was rolled back in preparation for the subsequent attempt. - Ray On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 3:07 PM Raymond Auge wrote: > I've abandoned it. > > Feel free to take it up again whenever you want. > > - Ray > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 3:01 PM Romain

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jwt-auth-1.0.4

packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le mar. 17 déc. 2019 à 09:31, Mark Struberg a écrit : > >> Don't worry, I'll keep an eye on it. >> And thanks for getting it rolling! >> >> txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> >> &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Simple JCache 1.0.5

+1 - Ray On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 9:36 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for our JCache implementation. > The only issue it fixes is: > > [image: Major] [image: Task] GERONIMO-6789 > Simple JCache > extension

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-openapi-1.0.13

+1 - Ray On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 9:21 AM Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Hi! > > Here is the staging repo > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1132/ > > > > source jars can be found at > >

Re: [VOTE] geronimo jsonp, jsonb, security, validation releases

+1 - Ray On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 4:39 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi! > > I want to call a VOTE on releasing > > > geronimo-json_1.1_spec-1.5 > geronimo-jsonb_1.0_spec-1.4 > geronimo-security_1.0_spec-1.1 > geronimo-validation_2.0_spec-1.1 > > The only difference to the previous releases is the

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jcdi_1.0 and 1.1 spec jars

+1 - Ray On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 1:37 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi! > > I want to call a VOTE on releasing > geronimo-jcdi_1.0-1.1 and > geronimo-jcdi_1.1-1.1 > > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1129/ > > source jars can be found > >

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec api version 1.3

+1 - Ray On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 1:40 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi! > > I want to call a VOTE on releasing > geronimo-jcdi_2.0 1.3 > > The staging repo is: > *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1130/ >

Re: [DISCUSS] release a few specs

+1 - Ray On Thu., Oct. 15, 2020, 8:04 a.m. Daniel Cunha, wrote: > +1 > > Em qui., 15 de out. de 2020 às 08:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofre < > j...@nanthrax.net> escreveu: > >> +1 >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> Le 15 oct. 2020 à 12:37, Mark Struberg a écrit : >> >> hi! >> >> I'd love to release a few

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.0

+1 - Ray On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:59 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.0 > > Here is the staging repo > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1127 > > And the source jar which is voted on > >

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo JavaMail Impl and Provider 1.0.0 for javamail spec 1.6

+1 - Ray On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:04 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the Geronimo JavaMail Impl and Provider for > javamail spec 1.6 > > Here is the staging repo > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1128 > > And the source

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Health v2.0.0 and Geronimo Metrics 1.0.5

+1 - Ray On Tue., Sep. 15, 2020, 8:31 a.m. Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to release our microprofile Health implementation in v2.0.0 and > Metrics implementation in v1.0.5. > > Main change is to support the new health spec (3.0.0-RC3) which drops > @Health and new

Re: [PROPOSAL] - website

+1 Nice job! - Ray On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:46 AM Francois Papon wrote: > Thanks Romain, > > Let me know ;) > > regards, > > Françoisfpa...@apache.org > > Le 20/05/2020 à 08:43, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Anyone against merging it? (will wait 2 more days then if there is no > objection

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Specs JCDI_2.0 1.2, Annotation_1.3 1.3, AtInject_1.0 1.2, Interceptor_1.2 1.2, JSONP_1.1 1.4, JSONB_1.0 1.3

+1 - Ray On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 2:14 AM Francois Papon wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > regards, > > Françoisfpa...@apache.org > > Le 28/04/2020 à 07:59, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for some of our spec with jakarta shades. > > Tags: > - >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo XBean 4.17

+1 - Ray On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > Le 27 avr. 2020 à 16:47, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for xbean 4.17 which provides asm8 shade. > > Here is the tag: >

Re: [DISCUSS] JakartaEE - continue rolling our own API jars vs use official ones?

As someone who has fought for better OSGi support in the MP spec APIs I can say that this has proven difficult and largely without success. Le sam. 25 avr. 2020 à 10:43, Mark Struberg a écrit : > JakartaEE moved to the Eclipse Foundation and all the APIs are now >> available without much

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Metrics 3.0-M2

+1 - Ray On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:23 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is the vote for our Microprofile Metrics implementation. > It brings our compliance to v3.0-M2 spec and also provides jars without > jaxrs part of the impl. > > Tag: >

Thinking to release geronimo-config-1.2.3

This would be 1.2.3 with support for MP-Config 1.4 final. Any objections? -- *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay)

Re: releasing geronimo-jwt-auth?

The fixes we made to work with Aries CDI were never released. They however, have been in a snapshot bundle for months. Sincerely, - Ray On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 1:32 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Ray, > > Is there anything new on master? > > Le sam. 28 mars 2020 à 17:5

releasing geronimo-jwt-auth?

I'd like to call a vote for releasing geronimo-jwt-auth in the next day or two. Any objections? -- *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay)

Re: [VOTE] release Apache JPA-2.2 spec v1.1

+1 (I didn't see this email previously for some reason) - Ray On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 8:24 AM Mark Struberg wrote: > my own +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > Am 14.03.2020 um 12:52 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > Le sam. 14 mars 2020 à 11:09, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a > écrit : > >> +1 (non

Re: [VOTE] release Apache Geronimo Genesis 2.4

+1 On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 8:24 AM Mark Struberg wrote: > my own +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > Am 13.03.2020 um 19:20 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > hi folks! > > I'd like to call a VOTE for Geronimo Genesis 2.4 > > I've upgraded apache-parent to the latest one (23) and also added handling > to

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo JCache Simple 1.0.4

+1 - Ray On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:36 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As mentionned on the list, here is the vote for our jcache implementation > fixing OSGi-CDI metadata. > > Here is the staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1119/

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo JCache Simple 1.0.3

+1 - Ray On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 3:48 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > Le ven. 14 f?vr. 2020 ? 09:22, Romain Manni-Bucau > a ?crit : > >> Hi everyone, >> >> As mentionned on the list, here is our jcache implementation release vote. >> Main change is to

Re: Release simple jcache soon?

+1 - Ray On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > It sounds good to me. > > Regards > JB > > Le 13 févr. 2020 à 18:20, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > > Hi all, > > I just activated bundle plugin to generate a manifest to enable to use our > simple jcache impl in OSGi.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XBean 4.16

+1 - Ray On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 31/01/2020 16:41, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here is our asm upgrade release (to v 7.3.1). > > > > Staging > > repository: >

Re: [XBean] 4.16 coming?

+1 On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 for me, go ahead. > > Regards > JB > > On 29/01/2020 09:27, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Any blocker to release xbean 4.16 with asm 7.3.1 upgrade? > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jwt-auth-1.0.4

Hey all, So I will cancel this vote and start a new one since I messed up the email. Also, this should act like a heads up that I want to do a release. I can give it a couple of days. - Ray On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 2:22 PM Raymond Auge wrote: > Hello All, > > I'd like to ca

[VOTE] Release geronimo-jwt-auth-1.0.4

Hello All, I'd like to call a vote for release of geronimo-jwt-auth-1.0.4 The staging repo can be found here https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1116 The sources are here:

Re: [VOTE] release Apache geronimo-openapi 1.0.12

+1 - Ray On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 11:52 PM Cesar Hernandez wrote: > +1. Thanks Mark. > > El mar., 10 dic. 2019 a las 16:25, Mark Struberg () > escribió: > >> hi folks! >> >> I did run the steps for the openapi-1.0.12 release >> >> The staging repo can be found here >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.0

+1 - Ray On Sun, Dec 8, 2019, 12:55 Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: > My own +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github > |

Re: [DISCUSS] graal tooling?

I'm not vehemently opposed as I have done my own graal salivating and not that I think anyone would care much even if I was completely opposed; but I will caution that this whole graal thing is a dangerous path that Oracle (and seemingly Redhat is just as happy to do it) are taking us all down.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XBean 4.15

+1 On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:01 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > +1 > > Le jeu. 24 oct. 2019 à 10:13, Francois Papon > a écrit : > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks! >> >> regards, >> >> Françoisfpa...@apache.org >> >> Le 23/10/2019 à 09:24, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : >> >> Hi everyone, >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Spec JSON-P 1.3

+1 - Ray On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 3:48 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to call vote for our jsonp 1.3 spec jar to get out this fix: > > [image: Blocker] [image: Bug] GERONIMO-6751 > JSON-P 1.1 > incompliance:

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-security_1.0_spec API

+1 - Ray On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:25 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-security_1.0_spec-1.0.jar. > This is an API which implements the Security API JSR-375 1.0 specification > . > > Here is the staging repo >

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-annotation-1.3 spec API

+1 - Ray On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:05 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-annotation-1.3_spec-1.2 jar. > This is an API which implements the common-annotations JSR-250 1.3 > specification. > > The only change was the introduction of @Repeatable on

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.11

+1 - Ray On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:21 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > oops, editing the subject to ensure we vote for the 1.0.11 and not 1.0.10 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog >

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.10

+1 - Ray On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:21 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi all, > > As mentionned, due to JSON-B mapping fixes I'd like to release OpenAPI > 1.0.11 so here is the vote. Here is the only issue we fixed: > > > [image: Bug] GERONIMO-6746 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo JWT Auth 1.0.3

+1 On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:39 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > +1 > > Le jeu. 25 juil. 2019 à 10:15, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a > écrit : > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 25/07/2019 09:46, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > While we are in the Microprofile

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.10

+1 On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:38 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > +1 > > Le jeu. 25 juil. 2019 à 10:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a > écrit : > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 25/07/2019 09:51, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > Here is the vote for our

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Health v1.0.2

+1 On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:38 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > +1 > > Le jeu. 25 juil. 2019 à 10:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a > écrit : > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 25/07/2019 09:55, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > I'd like to release our microprofile

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.9

+1 - Ray On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:48 AM Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 05.06.2019 um 10:21 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > As mentionned here is the vote for Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.9. > > > > The changelog is the following one: > >

Re: Release Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.9?

+1 - Ray On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:06 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Do we want to release our Microprofile OpenAPI implementation (v1.0.9)? > > Here is the diff - no worry it is the changelog not the code diff ;): > > PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatusDevelopment > [image: Major]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XBean 4.14

+1 - Ray On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:21 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Here is my own +1 > > Le jeu. 23 mai 2019 à 15:15, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > >> +1 >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau | Blog >> | Old Blog

Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis

ight be that "Jakarta EE REST" (a fictitious name for next JAX-RS) might contain a subset of packages which, in combination with JAXRS v2.1, also qualifies as "Jakarata EE Rest". - Ray On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 11:26 AM Raymond Auge wrote: > so is this a matter of fo

Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis

so is this a matter of forking all the current specs into the new namespace? Or is the intention to completely change the packages in-place? - Ray On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 1:58 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hmm > > My understanding was it was getting under eclipse license as well and was >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.8

+1 - Ray On Mon, Apr 29, 2019, 06:42 Ivan Junckes Filho, wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:57 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 29/04/2019 09:41, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > here is the vote for Geronimo OpenAPI

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XBean 4.13

+1 - Ray On Fri, Mar 29, 2019, 05:59 Francois Papon, wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks! > > regards, > > François paponfpa...@apache.org > > Le 29/03/2019 à 12:45, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi guys, > > Here is the vote for xbean 4.13, it solves 3 issues: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo JCache Simple 1.0.2

+1 - Ray On Fri, Mar 29, 2019, 05:42 Jean-Baptiste Onofré, wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > Le 29 mars 2019, à 09:59, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> We now support CompletionStage in our JCache interceptors. This is an >> important feature for Microprofile and

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.7

+1 - Ray On Fri, Mar 29, 2019, 04:54 Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: > Hi guys, > > Here is the vote for our microprofile openapi implementation v 1.0.7. Here > is the changelog: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220=12345014 > > It is mainly bugfixes about

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-json_1.1 spec API jar version 1.2

+1 - Ray On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:17 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > pingping, we need 1 more binding reviewer pretty please! > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > > On Saturday, 2 March 2019, 20:06:20 CET, Mark Struberg > wrote: > > > hi folks! > > I'd like to call a vote on releasing our jsonp-1.1

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar (take2)

+1 - Ray On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:50 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > hi folks! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the JPA-2.2 api (take2). > I've updated all missing parts and did verify with the signets against the > official jar. > > Here is the staging repo: >

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar

> > :) > > Do you have time to figure out what this is about? > Fixing our json spec in the meantime. > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > On Wednesday, 27 February 2019, 18:49:13 CET, Raymond Auge < > raymond.a...@liferay.com> wrote: > > > Plea

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar

Please do some sanity checking on it first ;) - Ray On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:08 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > great thanks gonna re-roll it tonight. > > LieGrue, > strub > > On Wednesday, 27 February 2019, 14:57:39 CET, Raymond Auge < > raymond.a...@liferay.com> wr

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar

ep this mindset. > > > > Le mer. 27 févr. 2019 à 00:17, Raymond Auge > a écrit : > > If you wish I could commit all of the above. > > > > - Ray > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:16 PM Raymond Auge > wrote: > > Hey Mark, > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar

If you wish I could commit all of the above. - Ray On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:16 PM Raymond Auge wrote: > Hey Mark, > > This is not a -1 but maybe a +0 due to I'd have liked to see a few changes: > > - The exported package versions being updated > - use official OSGi depend

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar

Hey Mark, This is not a -1 but maybe a +0 due to I'd have liked to see a few changes: - The exported package versions being updated - use official OSGi dependencies rather than the deprecated felix ones - the osgi.contract version wasn't amended to add 2.2 - don't use the old

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.6

+1 - Ray On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 7:45 AM Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > +1 > > Please pick up latest apache parent next time, see > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/9 > > Cheers > Dennis > -- *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) Senior

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Microprofile 1.0.2

+1 - Ray On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:49 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > here is the vote for Geronimo Microprofile 1.0.2, > > The changelog is mainly about version upgrade: > > [image: Major] [image: Improvement] GERONIMO-6691 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Safeguard 1.2.1

+1 - Ray On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:32 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 25/02/2019 09:27, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > here is the vote for Geronimo Safeguard 1.2.1, > > > > the only change in is the following one - but guarantees we

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenTracing 1.0.2

+1 - Ray On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 25/02/2019 08:46, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Here is the vote for our opentracing+microprofile impl v1.0.2. > > > > Staging repository is available > > at >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Metrics 1.0.3

+1 - Ray On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:11 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > here is the vote for our metrics impl 1.0.3. > > Changelog is: > > [image: Minor] [image: Improvement] GERONIMO-6680 > Add a beans.xml in > extension to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Config 1.2.2

+1 - Ray On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 2:55 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > here is the vote for Geronimo Config 1.2.2, > > the only change in is the following one: > > PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatusDevelopment > [image: Major] [image: Bug] GERONIMO-6696 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Jwt Auth 1.0.2

+1 - Ray On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 2:59 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > here is the vote for Apache Geronimo Jwt Auth 1.0.2. > > Here changelog has one issue - who popped up on openwebbeans bugtracker > originally: > > [image: Bug] GERONIMO-6697 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5

+1 - Ray On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:25 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > As requested last week, here is the Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5 vote. > > Staging repo can be found at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1087/ > Tag is at >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Microprofile Aggregator 1.0.1

+1 - Ray On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:17 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > Here is the annouced vote for our microprofile aggregator project. Here > are the fixed issues: > > PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatusDevelopment > [image: Major] [image: Bug] GERONIMO-6668 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.4 (take 2 - enum fix included)

+1 - Ray On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:10 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > We already have a few fixes which can be blocker for some users so i'd > like to release our MP openapi impl. Here are the issues we fixed - and the > enum fix i mentionned in previous vote is in: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Metrics 1.0.2

+1 - Ray On Wed, Jan 2, 2019, 10:18 Romain Manni-Bucau Hi guys, > > As mentionned here is the vote for Geronimo Metrics 1.0.2 to ensure sigar > extension does not register twice the same filesystem when multiple mount > points are present - which prevents the startup of any application >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.3

+1 - Ray On Wed, Jan 2, 2019, 10:10 Romain Manni-Bucau Hi guys, > > as mentionned here is the vote fore Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.3 to ensure we > don't need jackson when using it > > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1082 > My keys is still

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Safeguard 1.2.0

+1 - Ray On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:33 AM Bruno Baptista wrote: > Thanks > Bruno Baptista > https://twitter.com/brunobat_ > > > On 18/12/18 14:25, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > The one you are in charge ;): > https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-fault-tolerance/issues/355 > > Romain

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo OpenTracing 1.0.1

+1 - Ray On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:54 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > as mentionned here is the vote fore Geronimo OpenTracing 1.0.1 > > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1 >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Microprofile Aggregator

+1 - Ray On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:53 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > as mentionned here is the vote fore Geronimo Microprofile 1.0.0 > > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1 >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.2

+1 - Ray On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:45 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > as mentionned here is the vote fore Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.2 > > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1 >

Re: [VOTE]Apache Geronimo Metrics 1.0.1

+1 - Ray On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:54 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > as mentionned here is the vote fore Geronimo Metrics 1.0.1 > > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1 >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Health 1.0.1

+1 - Ray On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:44 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > as mentionned here is the vote fore Geronimo Health 1.0.1 > > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1 >

Re: [VOTE] Apacge geronimo JWT Auth 1.0.1

+1 - Ray On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:43 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > as mentionned here is the vote fore Geronimo JWT Auth 1.0.1 > > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1 >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Config 1.2.1

+1 - Ray On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:42 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > as mentionned here is the vote fore Geronimo Config 1.2.1 > > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1 >

Re: Microprofile OpenAPI

I do personally find it very weird that MP spec would prefer YAML over JSON when there is no YAML otherwise defined as part of the MP profile! If I wanted to build a minimal MP it means I have to add a YAML impl when the stack already defines JSON to be part of the stack? It makes little sense.

Adding missing/new Spec APIs

Hey all, I want to make sure I understand Geronimo's rational w.r.t. the Specs sub-project going forward in the face of Jakarta EE and in particular on the change in licensing, and also on the openness of the process. I suppose what I'm trying to accomplish in the long run is to make sure it is

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.12 release

+1 - Ray On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 8:55 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hello everyone, > Here is the vote to let us get asm7 final out. > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ (rev 30487) > The staging repo is: >

Re: MP impl & reusability

I will be busy the next two weeks due to releases and conferences, but I'd be glad to help. I would widen the target from karaf however to simply "reusable". - Ray On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 2:48 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi > > It sounds great. I would be more than happy to help. Let me

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

+1 - Ray On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:07 AM Łukasz Dywicki wrote: > Although not binding, here is +1 from me too :-) > > Cheers, > Lukasz > > On 10/3/18 12:22 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > +1 > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > >> Am 03.10.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > >> > >> +1

Re: asm7 preparation

lopment/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le lun. 1 oct. 2018 à 15:37, Raymond Auge a > écrit : > >> Sorry for the newbie interruption. But can someone point me to the >> relevant code/project/module in Geronimo that has this asm integration? >> >> Thanks, >&

Re: asm7 preparation

Sorry for the newbie interruption. But can someone point me to the relevant code/project/module in Geronimo that has this asm integration? Thanks, - Ray On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:30 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > > Le lun. 1 oct. 2018 à 14:26, Mark Struberg a écrit : > >> Introducing our

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Validation 2.0 (spec) v1.0

+1 - Ray On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 11:38 Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: > Hi guys, > > To enable BVal and TomEE releases, I'd like to release our validation spec > bundle. > > Here is the staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1071 > The dist (dev) area

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.10

+1 - Ray On Sat, Sep 29, 2018, 11:22 Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: > My own +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github > |

Re: OSGi review of the geronimo-validation_2.0_spec api

Hey Mark, Everything looks good for me. Sincerely, - Ray On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 8:44 AM Mark Struberg wrote: > hi folks (especially Raymond and Romain) > Could you please check if the OSGi bits in the validation-2.0 spec module > are proper? > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Specs: interceptor 1.2 v1.1, el 2.2 v1.1, atinject 1.0 v1.1, annotation 1.3 v1.1, cdi 2.0 v1.1, jaxrs 2.1 v1.1, jbatch 1.0 v1.1, validation 2.0 v1.1, json 1.1 v1.1, jsonb 1

This vote has passed with 3 votes (3 binding). I will upload the artifacts ASAP. - Ray On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Raymond Auge wrote: > +1 > > - Ray > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 6:29 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> +1 >> >> LieGrue, >> strub

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Specs: interceptor 1.2 v1.1, el 2.2 v1.1, atinject 1.0 v1.1, annotation 1.3 v1.1, cdi 2.0 v1.1, jaxrs 2.1 v1.1, jbatch 1.0 v1.1, validation 2.0 v1.1, json 1.1 v1.1, jsonb 1

LinkedIn | Book > > > > > > Le mar. 28 août 2018 à 19:30, Raymond Auge a > écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to call a vote on the release of the following specs: > > > > interceptor 1.2 v1.1 > > ** Sub-task > > * [GERONIMO-6628] -

Re: analysis the log

Hello Catie, I'm sure everyone here would love to help but I suspect you've chosen the wrong list to send your question? This the Apache Geronimo developer list and I suspect you are looking for the Apache HTTP Server mailing lists which can be found here [1]. Good luck! Sincerely, - Ray [1]

Re: Safegard status

> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le jeu. 30 août 2018 à 19:42, Raymond Auge a > écrit : > >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>

Re: Safegard status

Le jeu. 30 août 2018 19:14, Raymond Auge a > écrit : > >> Romain, you may not have seen this, but the OSGi Alliance worked on a >> (self-implemented) library (yes a non-OSGi library :) ) that might prove >> useful. It is very tiny so perhaps it could simply be emb

Re: Safegard status

Romain, you may not have seen this, but the OSGi Alliance worked on a (self-implemented) library (yes a non-OSGi library :) ) that might prove useful. It is very tiny so perhaps it could simply be embedded into the geronimo safeguard implementation. Promises === maven dep [1] spec [2]

Re: safeguard's TCK status

Got it! On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 3:57 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Unfortunately the TCK tests have timing issues. They are > non-deterministic. > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018, 15:15 Raymond Auge wrote: > >> must have been a first checkout, temporal kinda thing. >> >&

Re: safeguard's TCK status

must have been a first checkout, temporal kinda thing. Sorry for the noise, - Ray On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Raymond Auge wrote: > I've just forked geronimo-safeguard but it is failing the TCK. Is that > expected status? > > -- > *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.co

safeguard's TCK status

I've just forked geronimo-safeguard but it is failing the TCK. Is that expected status? -- *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay) Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance

[VOTE] Release Geronimo Specs: interceptor 1.2 v1.1, el 2.2 v1.1, atinject 1.0 v1.1, annotation 1.3 v1.1, cdi 2.0 v1.1, jaxrs 2.1 v1.1, jbatch 1.0 v1.1, validation 2.0 v1.1, json 1.1 v1.1, jsonb 1.0 v

Hi, I'd like to call a vote on the release of the following specs: *interceptor 1.2 v1.1* ** Sub-task * [GERONIMO-6628] - Apply Portable Java Contracts: Interceptor 1.2 * [GERONIMO-6635] - Consume Portable Java Contracts: Interceptor 1.2 *el 2.2 v1.1* ** Sub-task * [GERONIMO-6627] -

Re: geronimo-config-impl CDI beans

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Raymond Auge wrote: > Romain, to clarify your question about testing, which I'm only now finally > grasped; I wouldn't want to add such tests just yet because the OSGi CDI > integration spec is not final, nor is the RI. So I wouldn't want to add > SNA

  1   2   >