Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 1.0.2

+1 lG reini > Am 17.06.2022 um 16:56 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > My own +1 > > Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 15:21, fpapon > a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > > > > On 17/06/2022 10:40, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As discussed, here is the vote f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BatchEE 1.0.0

+1 lg reini > Am 10.05.2021 um 09:14 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > My own > > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > >> Am 08.05.2021 um 09:51 schrieb Mark Struberg > >: >> >> hi lords and ladies! >> >> I want to call a VOTE on releasing Apache BatchEE 1.0.0 >> This is main

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo BatchEE 0.6

Key Summary AssigneeStatus >> BATCHEE-135 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATCHEE-135> >> Command "Names" not working >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATCHEE-135> Reinhard Sandtner >> <https://issues.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-json_1.1 spec API jar version 1.2

+1 lg reini > Am 02.03.2019 um 20:25 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > Le sam. 2 mars 2019 à 20:06, Mark Struberg > a écrit : > hi folks! > > I'd like to call a vote on releasing our jsonp-1.1 api jar in version 1.2. > This Release fixes > https://issues.apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

+1 > Am 12.06.2018 um 02:57 schrieb John D. Ament : > > +1 ! > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 11:43 AM Mark Struberg > wrote: > Hi folks! > > take 2 of the geronimo-config-1.2 release > staging repo is at > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheger

Re: Mp opentracing?

hey, took a very quick look to the spec… sounds very interesting - maybe something i could use in my $$-project +1 for a new repo to play a little bit with it ;) lg reini > Am 13.05.2018 um 16:05 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys > > Anyone started to have a look to opentracing spec? I

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving our repos to git?

hey, imo we should not mix up svn and git repos because for me its hard to think about which project/module am i working on and which vcs is it using. i would keep it simple i do not prefer to have a separate repo for each geronimo-specs module… we use this approach in my $$-job and its a mess

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Config 1.1

+1 src builds LICENSE, NOTICE, sha, md5, sig ok PS: i’ll update the copyright year to 2018 in the NOTICE file… lg reini > Am 04.01.2018 um 11:33 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 04.01.2018 um 08:32 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : >> >> +1 >> >> Le mar. 2 janv. 2

Re: [VOTE] JAX-RS 2.1 spec jar release

hey, small notice on the NOTICE file: contains Apache Geronimo JAX-RS 2.0 API Copyright 2010-2014 The Apache Software Foundation but should be Apache Geronimo JAX-RS 2.1 API and the Copyright 2010-2017 license ok, source builds, md5 and sha ok, signature ok +1 (non-binding) > Am 21.12.2017 u

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.0

+1 (non-binding) lg reini > Am 30.07.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > On Jul 30, 2017, at 12:04, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > wrote: > +1 > Thanks > > Le ven. 28 juil. 2017 à 13:20, Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

+1 (nonbinding) > Am 27.06.2017 um 11:17 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > Awesome > > +1 > > Le mar. 27 juin 2017 à 11:16, Mark Struberg > a écrit : > Hi! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing our geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar in > version 1.0 > This is the API for

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-annotation_1.3 spec jar

+1 > Am 26.06.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on our version of common-annoations 1.3. > We need this for CDI-2.0. The only change is that @Priority is now also > applicable to methods. > > Please VOTE for releasing geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec > > Th

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jsonb_1.0 v 1.0 API jar

+1 (nonbinding) lg reini > Am 24.04.2017 um 10:04 schrieb Guillaume Nodet : > > +1 > > 2017-04-21 17:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg >: > Hi! > > Please VOTE on releasing version 1.0 of the Geronimo JSONB 1.0 API (JSON > Binding). > > The staging repo is > https://repos

Re: [VOTE] Release geroniom-jaxrs_2.0 API jar

+1 (nonbinding) lg reini > Am 17.04.2017 um 08:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github

Re: [VOTE] Release geroniom-jsonp_1.1 API.jar

+1 nonbinding lg reini > Am 17.04.2017 um 00:08 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi! > > Please VOTE on releasing version 1.0 of the Geronimo JSONP 1.1 API. > > The staging repo is > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1031/ > > The source package can be found at:

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6558) API for JSR-374 JSON-P 1.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner updated GERONIMO-6558: Attachment: GERONIMO-6558-JsonPatchBuilder.patch GERONIMO-6558

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6558) API for JSR-374 JSON-P 1.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner updated GERONIMO-6558: Attachment: GERONIMO-6558-jsonpatch-doc.patch > API for JSR-374 JSON-P