code under the Apache License. I don't believe a few
files that are clearly marked would substantially change the fact that
the Geronimo SVN meets that criteria. If you do proceed to do this,
mention it in the next regularly scheduled board report and move on.
- Sam Ruby
(*) http://www.sun.com/cddl/cddl.html
On 8/4/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW, the theory under which we (geronimo) has been operating is that
> the sun copyright and legal statements apply to the text
> documentation in the schemas and that once that is removed the rest
> forms a part of the javaee specifications th
p.
Every code base should be looked at with the possibility of being a TLP.
And with the possibility of being incorporated within an existing project.
Saying "I want ActiveMQ at the ASF", and saying "I think ActiveMQ would
make a fine addition to Geronimo" are both reasonable things to say.
Saying "I want ActiveMQ at the ASF, but only if it is destined to be a
part of Geronimo" is not.
- Sam Ruby
