I just submitted the AG2.0 patch to the JIRA. My question from
AG1.1.1 below remains and is valid for the AG2.0 code, which is
essentially the same.
On 1/25/07, Ted Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have implemented this support in AG 1.1.1, and submitted the patch
to the JIRA. I wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Kirby updated GERONIMO-2735:
Attachment: JIRA2735.2.0.patch
Here is a patch for ag 2.0, based on v499398 code.
>
input on
a good and proper approach.
On 1/19/07, Ted Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A properties file sounds like a good idea. Presumably this would work like
how the config.xml filename is passed in: from the configFile attribute of
the AttributeManager GBean in the j2ee-system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Kirby updated GERONIMO-2735:
Attachment: JIRA2735.1.1.1.patch
Here is a patch for 1.1.1 based on Rev447393 code.
Here is
(Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 1.1.1, 2.0
Environment: Offline deployment
Reporter: Ted Kirby
Fix For: 2.0, 1.1.1
Minimize the side effects of using deployment commands in the "offline" mode.
In the 1.1.1 releas
ely in e.g a
properties file or something.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 18, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Ted Kirby wrote:
The idea is allow an identical configuration on a set of machines, yet
allow customization through property substitution with command line/system
property override ( i.e. java -Dxxx.yyy.zzz=AB
The idea is allow an identical configuration on a set of machines, yet allow
customization through property substitution with command line/system
property override (i.e. java -Dxxx.yyy.zzz=ABC).
For example, allow the following in config.xml:
${tomcat.port}
${tomcat.listen.ip}
These va
Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.0-M1, 1.1.1, 1.1.x
Environment: All
Reporter: Ted Kirby
Priority: Minor
Allow property substitution as it works in maven, Spring, and JBoss.
Allow a geronimo.properties type
I wonder if this is an openejb problem? See JIRA 2063: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2063
On 10/20/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rick,Here is a log with veryverbose option turned on.CheersPrasadOn 10/19/06, Prasad Kashyap <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Here is the ger
Sounds good. Good luck! Are you posting your presentation slides anywhere?
On 10/24/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,FYI -- I'll be giving an Apache Geronimo presentation at the OpenSource Conference in Tokyo. The talk is at 11 AM on October the 28th.
Here's some conference informa
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2363?page=all ]
Ted Kirby updated GERONIMO-2363:
Attachment: dbwizard_edit.jsp.patch
here is a patch, or rather a bypass. I think the file needs more work, as
described above in the JIRA.
> Cons
ira/browse/GERONIMO-2363
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: console, databases
Affects Versions: 1.1.1, 1.2
Reporter: Ted Kirby
>From admin console, click Database Pools, Create new p
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2063?page=comments#action_12425749
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-2063:
-
I guess the moral of the story is that if you plan to use corba, you might as
well have it start when the server
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2063?page=comments#action_12425748
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-2063:
-
If j2ee-corba is started, stopped and then started again, magicgball does not
run at all.
You get this failure in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2063?page=all ]
Ted Kirby updated GERONIMO-2063:
Attachment: G2063-openejb211.patch
i manually start j2ee-corba before magicgball.
The problem here is that on second start, the POA already exists.
this is
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2063?page=comments#action_12425311
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-2063:
-
If j2ee-corba is not started before magicgball, the start, stop, start of
magicball gives:
13:52:45,531 ERROR
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2239?page=comments#action_12424254
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-2239:
-
getImplicitMatch() should pass new HashMap() insteand of Collections.EMPTY_MAP
on its calls to getMatchesFromName
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2239?page=comments#action_12424168
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-2239:
-
Now that I look at the code, this is probably easily fixed by checking for
Collections.EMPTY_MAP, and if so, set
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment, OpenEJB
Affects Versions: 1.1.1
Reporter: Ted Kirby
Priority: Critical
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException
at
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2208?page=comments#action_12423489
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-2208:
-
Here is stack trace:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/geronimo/util/encoders
issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 1.1.x
Reporter: Ted Kirby
When trying to do a remote deploy using geronimo-deploy-jsr88-1.1.jar, got a
class not found exception on org.apache.geronimo.util.encoders.Base64. This
class is packaged in geronimo-util-1.1
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1145?page=comments#action_12421596
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-1145:
-
Thanks Rick.
I am still confused about David's fix of [05/Dec/05 10:32 PM].
When you say "This fix
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1145?page=comments#action_12421328
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-1145:
-
On further inspection, it seems a key piece of the [05/Dec/05 10:32 PM] fix is
missing. It seems the intent of the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1145?page=comments#action_12421316
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-1145:
-
Could/Should not then the [08/Nov/05 10:47 PM] workaround (dependency of
UnprotectedServer on Server in j2ee-corba
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2120?page=comments#action_12416261
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-2120:
-
I would prefer some use of reflection, to keep in as much checking as possible.
I have successfully tested and run with the
-2120
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment, OpenEJB
Versions: 1.1
Environment: Win XP, Intel, Sun JDK 142
Reporter: Ted Kirby
See http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-user/200606.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTE
: 1.1
Environment: Windows
Reporter: Ted Kirby
Priority: Minor
See this thread in user mailing list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-user/200605.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly
I think this is reasonable. However, PLEASE keep MagicGBall up to date and working.
I like a working CORBA sample, with both security and no security.
Ted Kirby
ncluded, special command-line arguments, environment properties, and so on."
- sachin
On Mar 1, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Ted Kirby wrote:
For the record, this did work, when I properly installed it in a fresh, new, pristine eclipse tree.
It also worked when I lanched it in debug mode.
What I
completely new workspace?)
I had then deleted my old projects, then created new ones, and this discouragedAccess rule was not working.
Now, I installed my eclipse to a tst\base dir.
To test, I xcopy that toe tst\e, then extract the plugin to tst\e, and run, with new workspace.
On 3/1/06, Ted Kirby
he vision is to go even beyond that. (ejb component, web component) thus each project type may target the same server buts the contents of its runtime would differ.
- sachin
On Feb 28, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Ted Kirby wrote:
Thanks. I put my extension element in devtools\modules\eclipse-plugin\plugins\
side a plugin.xml. The .serverdef file is a WTP specific file for defining generic servers. Its loaded via an EMF model and thus by adding your entry there invalidates your file and thats why you're seeing the exception.
- sachin
On Feb 28, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Ted Kirby wrote:
I want
I want to use this new support.
I put
point="org.apache.geronimo.devtools.eclipse.core.discouragedRuntimeAccess"
>
value="/lib"
/>
in devtools\modules\eclipse-plugin\plugins\org.apache.geronimo.devtools.eclipse.core\serverdef\geronimo10.serverdef, but it did not work. From the eclipse log, I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1455?page=comments#action_12362654
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-1455:
-
The problem is independent of the console. Is easily recreateable from
command-line deployer.
While geronimo/j2ee-corba/1.0
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1447?page=comments#action_12362510
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-1447:
-
I did get it to work, both NoSec and SSL.
I fixed three problems:
1. in client-corba plan.xml, fixed module names from org
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1447?page=comments#action_12362486
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-1447:
-
I have discovered that starting geronimo/j2ee-corba/1.0/car doesn't always work
properly.
In particular, the TSS Beans
601 - 636 of 636 matches
Mail list logo
