Getting 2.0.1 out the door was a great step and now might be a good
time to start discussing where we want geronimo to head next. Here
are some ideas I've had or think are important. If I were to try to
write actual sentences about all of this I'd probably never send the
email so this is
On 8/31/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Getting 2.0.1 out the door was a great step and now might be a good
> time to start discussing where we want geronimo to head next. Here
> are some ideas I've had or think are important. If I were to try to
> write actual sentences about all o
On 31/08/2007, at 10:12 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Clustering
IIUC we have a lot of partial clustering solutions. For instance
there's WADI, native tomcat clustering, a terracotta integration,
and IIUC Jeff has been working on a clustering solution (my
apologies if I left any out). I'd li
> > Getting 2.0.1 out the door was a great step and now might be a good
> > time to start discussing where we want geronimo to head next. Here
> > are some ideas I've had or think are important. If I were to try to
> > write actual sentences about all of this I'd probably never send the
> > email
On 9/2/07, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > but to be honest I'd need a lot of support to get it done (mentor?).
>
> As I said previously on this list, I'd be willing to help. Alas, my
> time is limited as well but I can provide help and insides where
> necessary.
Hi Karl,
Oh, I see a m
On 9/2/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/2/07, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > but to be honest I'd need a lot of support to get it done (mentor?).
> >
> > As I said previously on this list, I'd be willing to help. Alas, my
> > time is limited as well but I can pro
On Aug 30, 2007, at 5:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Getting 2.0.1 out the door was a great step and now might be a good
time to start discussing where we want geronimo to head next. Here
are some ideas I've had or think are important. If I were to try
to write actual sentences about all of th
Oh, one more thing which I think is also critical path for the health
of the server and its community...
LOGGING REFORM
We've talked about this here and there, most folks agree we need to
reform our logging usage... but so far its yet to happen. It is a
fairly simple task IMO, but its hug
FYI, I took a brief stab and making this into a wiki page here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Roadmap+for+2.1
I've only really included my thoughts and davids, so please update
this puppy... IMO this type of information is better captured in a
wiki page, though its g
Thanks for the CWiki ...
On Sep 3, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
FYI, I took a brief stab and making this into a wiki page here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Roadmap+for+2.1
I've only really included my thoughts and davids, so please update
this puppy... I
On 9/3/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aighty?
Done. Thanks!
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Apologies for such a late response. This thread came out while I was
on vacation and got buried by a lot of other things...
This is a good list. Comments, below.
On Aug 30, 2007, at 8:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Getting 2.0.1 out the door was a great step and now might be a good
time to star
12 matches
Mail list logo