Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-14 Thread Forrest Xia
+1 for both, thanks! Forrest On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Hi! > > I'd like to call a VOTE for the re-roll on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13. > I fixed the issues catched by Jarek, txs 4 the catch! > > > The Maven Staging Repo which contains both releases (xbean needs g

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-13 Thread Guillaume Nodet
+1 for both On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Hi! > > I'd like to call a VOTE for the re-roll on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13. > I fixed the issues catched by Jarek, txs 4 the catch! > > > The Maven Staging Repo which contains both releases (xbean needs genesis): > https:

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-12 Thread Jarek Gawor
I guess the xbean repo issue is not really a show stopper - just stuff that we don't need and it might affect build performance a bit but shouldn't harm anything. So I'm changing my xbean vote to +0. Jarek On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > +1 for genesis. > > -1 for xbean. Un

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-12 Thread Mark Struberg
[VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13 > > >is this snapshot repo an issue? it is not used and that's the apache snapshot >repo (should even be in the apache parent pom IIRC) > > >Romain Manni-Bucau >Twitter: @rmannibucau >Blog: http://rmannibucau.word

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-12 Thread David Blevins
+1 for genesis +1 for xbean. The presence of a snapshot repository declaration is fine, IMO. I built both genesis and xbean tags against a clean maven repo and no snapshots were downloaded. -David On Mar 11, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > +1 for genesis. > > -1 for xbean. Unless

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-12 Thread Mark Struberg
here is my +1 for both. LieGrue, strub > > From: Mark Struberg >To: geronimo-dev >Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 9:12 PM >Subject: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13 > > > >Hi! > >I'd like to call a V

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-12 Thread Kevan Miller
Here are the Jira release notes for xbean: Release Notes - XBean - Version 3.13 ** Bug * [XBEAN-233] - Support for RetentionPolicy.CLASS broken for ElementType FIELD, METHOD and CONSTRUCTOR * [XBEAN-238] - ClassNotFoundException not catch so missing classes make AnnotationFinder scannin

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
is this snapshot repo an issue? it is not used and that's the apache snapshot repo (should even be in the apache parent pom IIRC) *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau * *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* *LinkedIn:

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-11 Thread Jarek Gawor
+1 for genesis. -1 for xbean. Unless I'm looking at a cached version, there are still snaphot repositories defined in the root pom (marked with ). Jarek On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Hi! > > I'd like to call a VOTE for the re-roll on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13. > I

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 (non binding) *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau * *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/3/8 Mark Struberg >

[VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

2013-03-08 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE for the re-roll on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13. I fixed the issues catched by Jarek, txs 4 the catch! The Maven Staging Repo which contains both releases (xbean needs genesis): https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-004/ SVN source tag