> On Sep 8, 2017, at 2:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> I think i get your point of view. Ill note that i didnt participate in this
> vote but my POV is that we were only voting on item 1, retire the server.
>
> The fact that new components are coming in is a different item. If the goal
> is
> On Sep 8, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> This 'implied' 3rd block was actually never implied nor up for discussion.
> Not quite sure what I did word wrong to give you that impression.
> But rest ensurred that it was never intended that way!
>> Paraphrasing, I’ve seen “we agreed t
On Sep 8, 2017 5:10 PM, "David Blevins" wrote:
Moving the thread over here so we’re all on the same page.
> On Sep 8, 2017, at 3:28 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:45 AM David Blevins
wrote:
> > On Aug 30, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >
> > +1 for going forw
This 'implied' 3rd block was actually never implied nor up for discussion.
Not quite sure what I did word wrong to give you that impression.
But rest ensurred that it was never intended that way!
Why should we try to block anyone else from creating reusable components?
What you might mean is that
That was my understanding too.
Especially, the initial vote email says
"Note that this vote is only about the Geroniom Server but NOT about the
shared components.
Those components will be further maintained - or moved to a different
project later."
Which to me goes against your point #3.
2017-
Moving the thread over here so we’re all on the same page.
> On Sep 8, 2017, at 3:28 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:45 AM David Blevins wrote:
> > On Aug 30, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >
> > +1 for going forward
> >
> > Note that I also totally understand
Le 2 sept. 2017 21:23, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :
Time to tally the VOTE!
The following votes have been cast:
+1 Romain Manni-Bucau, David Jencks, Alan Cabrera, Guillaume Nodet,
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (nb), Mark Struberg
No -1 nor 0
That means the VOTE has passed and the Geronimo server parts wil
Time to tally the VOTE!
The following votes have been cast:
+1 Romain Manni-Bucau, David Jencks, Alan Cabrera, Guillaume Nodet,
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (nb), Mark Struberg
No -1 nor 0
That means the VOTE has passed and the Geronimo server parts will get
retird/EOLed.
Txs to all who voted!
Alan,
