Ok ... here are the final results.
The vote passes with 17 votes (12 by PMC members).
I will forward this request on to the ASF Infrastructure team and
communicate back to the Geronimo team any negotiation that occurs as a
result.
Thank you all.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this
The vote passes with 17 votes (12 by PMC members).
I will forward this request on to the ASF Infrastructure team and
communicate back to the Geronimo team any negotiation that occurs as a
result.
Thank you all.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF
Hmmm .. just realized that I said I would call the vote on Friday rather
than Thursday. So, the vote is still open in case you still want to
chime in.
Sorry for the premature call of the vote.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
The vote passes with 17 votes (12 by PMC members).
I will forward this
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure team,
they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the recommendation
and supports the intended use of the systems. I think it also bodes
well to demonstrate that the entire Geronimo community stands behind the
proposal,
Here's my +1.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure team,
they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the recommendation
and supports the intended use of the systems. I think it also bodes
well to demonstrate that the entire Geronimo
+1
Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure
team, they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the
recommendation and supports the intended use of the systems. I think
it also bodes well to demonstrate that the entire Geronimo community
stands
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
Rick McGuire wrote:
| +1
|
| Joe Bohn wrote:
| If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure
| team, they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the
| recommendation and supports the intended use of the systems. I
+1
Viet
+1
--kevan
On May 20, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure
team, they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the
recommendation and supports the intended use of the systems. I
think it also bodes
Joe Bohn wrote:
[ ] +1 I agree with the need and support the proposal. Present it to the
ASF Infrastructure team.
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 I don't see the need or disagree with the proposal. Do not
present this proposal to the ASF Infrastructure team.
+1
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
+1
--jason
On May 20, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure
team, they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the
recommendation and supports the intended use of the systems. I
think it also bodes well to demonstrate
+1
Jarek
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure team, they
want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the recommendation and
supports the intended use of the systems. I think it also bodes well
+1
I hope that the ASF Infrastructure Team has a good idea of the type
of rather heavyweight testing involved by the TCK to warrant such a
configuration.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 20/05/2008, at 10:22 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure
team,
+1
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure team,
they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the recommendation
and supports the intended use of the systems. I think it also bodes
well to demonstrate that the entire Geronimo
+1
david jencks
On May 20, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure
team, they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the
recommendation and supports the intended use of the systems. I
think it also bodes well to
+1
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:08 AM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
david jencks
On May 20, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure team,
they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the recommendation and
+1
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure team,
they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the recommendation and
supports the intended use of the systems. I think it also bodes well to
+1
Jay
Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure team,
they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the recommendation
and supports the intended use of the systems. I think it also bodes
well to demonstrate that the entire Geronimo community
+1
On May 20, 2008, at 7:22 AM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure
team, they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the
recommendation and supports the intended use of the systems. I
think it also bodes well to
+1
Cheers!
Hernan
Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure team,
they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the recommendation
and supports the intended use of the systems. I think it also bodes
well to demonstrate that the entire Geronimo
+1
David
On May 20, 2008, at 5:22 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure
team, they want assurance that the Geronimo PMC is behind the
recommendation and supports the intended use of the systems. I
think it also bodes well to demonstrate
21 matches
Mail list logo
