The vote passes with 5 +1 (all pmc members) and no other votes.
I'll get to work getting the binaries and site pushed out. As usual, it
will take a little while for the images to get synced to the mirrors.
Thanks!
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a third release candidate of the Concurrent
+1
Jay
(voted on the wrong thread last time)
Joe Bohn wrote:
> I've prepared a third release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your
> review and vote. The only change from rc2 is an update to the LICENSE
> file to include just the apache header (thanks to Kevan).
>
> This is spec is still un
+1
Jay
Joe Bohn wrote:
> I've prepared a release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your review
> and vote. This is spec is still under development so we are using an
> artifact version of 1.0-EA to indicate that it is not yet final. I'm
> just the release vehicle here ... Jarek did all the w
+1
Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a third release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your
review and vote. The only change from rc2 is an update to the LICENSE
file to include just the apache header (thanks to Kevan).
This is spec is still under development so we are using an arti
+1
Jarek
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've prepared a third release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your
> review and vote. The only change from rc2 is an update to the LICENSE file
> to include just the apache header (thanks to Kevan).
>
> This is
+1
Thanks Joe...
--kevan
On Dec 8, 2008, at 11:26 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a third release candidate of the Concurrent spec for
your review and vote. The only change from rc2 is an update to the
LICENSE file to include just the apache header (thanks to Kevan).
This is spec is st
+1 (hopefully this will be the last vote for this spec).
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a third release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your
review and vote. The only change from rc2 is an update to the LICENSE
file to include just the apache header (thanks to Kevan).
This is spec
I've prepared a third release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your
review and vote. The only change from rc2 is an update to the LICENSE
file to include just the apache header (thanks to Kevan).
This is spec is still under development so we are using an artifact
version of 1.0-EA to indi
The license files aren't quite right ... need to cancel this once more.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a second release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your
review and vote. The only change from rc1 is the addition of the
LICENSE/NOTICE files from specs/trunk into the
specs/trunk/ge
+1
Jarek
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've prepared a second release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your
> review and vote. The only change from rc1 is the addition of the
> LICENSE/NOTICE files from specs/trunk into the
> specs/trunk/geronimo-concu
+1
Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a second release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your
review and vote. The only change from rc1 is the addition of the
LICENSE/NOTICE files from specs/trunk into the
specs/trunk/geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec.
This is spec is still under developm
+1
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a second release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your
review and vote. The only change from rc1 is the addition of the
LICENSE/NOTICE files from specs/trunk into the
specs/trunk/geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec.
This is spec is still under development
I've prepared a second release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your
review and vote. The only change from rc1 is the addition of the
LICENSE/NOTICE files from specs/trunk into the
specs/trunk/geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec.
This is spec is still under development so we are using an artifac
It looks like we need to get the LICENSE/NOTICE files included in the
src for this spec. They are included in the artifacts, but it seems
they also need to be included in the src tree and pulling them from
specs-parent is not sufficient.
I'll make the changes and get a new rc up for vote lat
+1
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your review
and vote. This is spec is still under development so we are using an
artifact version of 1.0-EA to indicate that it is not yet final. I'm
just the release vehicle here ... Jarek did all the
Oh yes ... here's my +1.
I also ran the maven rat plugin on the source and verified all the
source files contained the required headers.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your review
and vote. This is spec is still under development so we are u
+1 (thanks for putting this together!)
Jarek
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've prepared a release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your review and
> vote. This is spec is still under development so we are using an artifact
> version of 1.0-EA to indic
I've prepared a release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your review
and vote. This is spec is still under development so we are using an
artifact version of 1.0-EA to indicate that it is not yet final. I'm
just the release vehicle here ... Jarek did all the work :-)
The source level is
18 matches
Mail list logo
