[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482419
 ] 

Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMO-2818:
----------------------------------------

I tried to reproduce this on 1.2 with your attached ears.  With 
deploy-inPlace.ear deployment failed with the "../' prefix and worked correctly 
as expected when I removed the prefix as the manifest  is defined in the 
notInPlace-ear.

Thus I do not see a problem here and the scenario works correctly with modules 
inside an exploded or packed ear without having to modify the manifest.

> In-Place deployment does not interpret Manifest Class-Path entries correctly 
> in JAR files
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-2818
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2818
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: deployment
>    Affects Versions: 1.2
>         Environment: Windows XP SP2
>            Reporter: Aman Nanner
>             Fix For: 1.2
>
>         Attachments: deploy-inPlace-ear.zip, deploy-notInPlace-ear.zip
>
>
> From the mailing list regarding deployment of EARs that contain JARS with a 
> Class-Path entry in their Manifest files:
> ----
> It seems like the behaviour is different depending on whether I deploy the 
> EAR as "inPlace" or not.  I was deploying an expanded EAR "inPlace" and it 
> seems that I needed the "../" prefix before each JAR in my Manifest  
> classpath.  I tried deploying an EAR containing actual JAR archives without 
> the "inPlace" attribute, and I had to change my Manifest classpath  
> references by removing the "../" prefix to make it work.
> My guess is that the deployer creates a different folder hiearchy when 
> deploying an application without the "inPlace" attribute.
> ----
> To review, using "inPlace" deployment requires that a "../" prefix be used in 
> Manifest class-path entries to reference library JARs relative to the EAR 
> root.  This is a bug, and it should be the same as non-inPlace deployment, 
> where library JARs are already relative to the EAR root.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to