That will happen as we close out the final bugs Donald. The transaction problem will most likely be
in one of the components you named below so they haven't been requested to version yet. Hopefully
soon :)
Donald Woods wrote:
Can everyone add a reply to this email thread as the dependent SNA
We'll have an idea later today. I think its critical and I am opening a JIRA
for it.
Jeff Genender wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I posted a note a few days ago with my proposed plan for releasing 1.1.
There was only one response from Jason so I will take the silence as
acceptance of the plan
Can everyone add a reply to this email thread as the dependent SNAPSHOT
projects (like OpenEJB, TranQL, ActiveMQ, ...) have created a release
version and its available on one of the default Maven repos? Given how
interdependent Geronimo, OpenEJB and TranQL are on each other, those
need to all
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I posted a note a few days ago with my proposed plan for releasing 1.1.
> There was only one response from Jason so I will take the silence as
> acceptance of the plan. Today I will:
>
> * be moving all JIRAs out from 1.1 and moving them to 1.2.
> * Cutting a release bui
I posted a note a few days ago with my proposed plan for releasing 1.1. There was only one response
from Jason so I will take the silence as acceptance of the plan. Today I will:
* be moving all JIRAs out from 1.1 and moving them to 1.2.
* Cutting a release build for review and will post it to