Is Geronimo performance tuning a good topic to cover? I guess we don't
have some nice materials on this topic currently?
-Jack
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Forrest_Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the ease of use character of Geronimo is better to be worded in the
general
On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:33 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
Is Geronimo performance tuning a good topic to cover? I guess we
don't have some nice materials on this topic currently?
Sure. All good potential topics. We don't have to list all potential
topics.
Thanks for the feedback, all.
--kevan
On Jul 14, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Sorry ... I think you should just consider the lack of comments to
be silent approval :-).
I was, just giving people a reminder...
I really am fine with it just as it is worded. However, here are
some other thoughts.
- Do we need to
I think the ease of use character of Geronimo is better to be worded in the
general description. The convenient admin console is definitely a bright
spot compared to other open source java application servers.
--
View this message in context:
On 07/13/2009 11:53 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
There will be a Geronimo Track at ApacheCon US '09. We will be sharing a
full day with the Directory Project. This means that we'll have 2 to 3
50 minute time slots. We have some flexibility on how we format these
time slots. So, IIUC, we can
Comments, anybody? I'm hoping to get started with this tomorrow...
--kevan
On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
There will be a Geronimo Track at ApacheCon US '09. We will be
sharing a full day with the Directory Project. This means that we'll
have 2 to 3 50 minute time
Sorry ... I think you should just consider the lack of comments to be
silent approval :-).
I really am fine with it just as it is worded. However, here are some
other thoughts.
- Do we need to clearly state that Geronimo delivers (out of the box) a
fully compliant Java EE Server in addition
All,
There will be a Geronimo Track at ApacheCon US '09. We will be sharing
a full day with the Directory Project. This means that we'll have 2 to
3 50 minute time slots. We have some flexibility on how we format
these time slots. So, IIUC, we can sub-divide these time slots, if we
