I have a BPEL SU deploying from a SA and it works good, except I have yet
to get a doc into it. Im sure I will get it..
I followed the servicemix example for the loanbroker BPEL SU. I
dissassembled it
and then created my bpel SU exactly how it was.
hgkrt wrote:
You can find the sun
servicemix-bpe is not supported anymore.
You should give a try to Apache Ode instead.
On 6/26/07, jbi joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to install netbeans BPEL SE into servicemix 3.1?
If so, can I get some detailed instructions on doing it?
I took a look through the netbeans
-bpel example to use Apache Ode
--
Key: SM-946
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-946
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Task
Components: servicemix-assembly
Affects
/viewvc?view=revrev=535212
Upgrade loan-broker-bpel example to use Apache Ode
--
Key: SM-946
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-946
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Task
+1 :)
On 5/3/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some changes ready to commit to upgrade the loan-broker-bpel
example
from the ServiceMix distribution to Apache Ode instead of our deprecated
servicemix-bpe SE. I think we should make this change in both trunk and
3.1 branch
Not until there is a release at least.
On 5/4/07, Adrian Co [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does this mean that ServiceMix will bundle the ode jbi installer or will
this be a separate download?
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have some changes ready to commit to upgrade the loan-broker-bpel
example
Yeah, I think we will have to discuss that.
That's a good idea, but then I think we would need several distributions
maybe.
Another problem would be a release cyclic dependency somehow as ServiceMix
would rely on Ode and Ode relies on ServiceMix dependencies...
On 5/4/07, Alex Boisvert [EMAIL
Hi,
i meant using ode and not the bpe...
gnodet wrote:
I have really no idea.
One of the problem is that the bpel engine used by servicemix-bpe
is not supported anymore, that's why this component has been
deprecated (see
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/servicemix-bpe.html).
I
From the stack trace, you are actually using servicemix-bpe ...
On 3/10/07, yhofri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i meant using ode and not the bpe...
gnodet wrote:
I have really no idea.
One of the problem is that the bpel engine used by servicemix-bpe
is not supported anymore, that's
Hi,
i've been trying to use Sun - openESB BPEL SE with servicemix, yet
encountered some issues.
has anyone done that before ?
is servicemix compatible with Sun/openESB and any other JBI Spec. components
?
10x
hofri
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/integrating-Sun---openESB
- openESB BPEL SE with servicemix, yet
encountered some issues.
has anyone done that before ?
is servicemix compatible with Sun/openESB and any other JBI Spec.
components ?
10x
hofri
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/integrating-Sun---openESB-BPEL-SE-with-servicemix
The defaultMep attribute is missing on the jms endpoint in loan-broker-bpel demo
Key: SM-843
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-843
Project: ServiceMix
://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=507629
Log:
SM-843: The defaultMep attribute is missing on the jms endpoint in
loan-broker-bpel demo
Modified:
incubator/servicemix/trunk/samples/loan-broker/loan-broker-jms-su/src/main/resources/xbean.xml
Author: gnodet
Date: Wed Feb 14 09:17:00 2007
New
New Revision: 507632
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=507632
Log:
SM-828: Add a client for the loan-broker-bpel demo. Patch provided by Gregoire
Autric, thx \!
Added:
incubator/servicemix/trunk/samples/loan-broker/build.xml (with props)
incubator/servicemix/trunk/samples/loan
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-833.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.2
into loan-broker-bpel sample
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-826:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
Add client for loan-broker-bpel
into loan-broker-bpel sample - javax.jbi.messaging.MessagingException: Do not
understand pattern: null
--
Key: SM-833
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grégoire A. updated SM-826:
---
Attachment: loan-broker.diff
please get this diff,
it includes all needs to add client for loan-broker-bpel
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38455
]
Grégoire A. commented on SM-826:
the JMSClientBPEL.java file is now useless
Add client for loan-broker-bpel
to
include
this class and start it (and add a line to the README.txt to tell how to launch
this class).
Thanks !
Add client for loan-broker-bpel
---
Key: SM-826
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-826
Project
Add client for loan-broker-bpel
---
Key: SM-826
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-826
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: servicemix-bpe
Affects Versions
The loan-broker-lw-su contains several lightweight components.
One of them is a JmsServiceComponent which receives a JMS
message posted by the client, route it to the bpel process and
send back the response. The bpel process will call several
other components (banks, credit agency) before
Hi everybody,
I've seen the bpel-bpe example of servicemix 3.0 snapshot and it works
fine...
But i can't understand what is the role of ActiveMq.
I know, tell me if i'm wrong, that the JMSClient class send a message on tcp
port 61616 and then this message arrive to the bpel that manage
Hi Guillaume,
thank you for the explaining.But I have one more question to make
I've seen the bpel-bpe example of servicemix 3.0 snapshot and it works
fine...
But i can't understand what is the role of ActiveMq.
I know, tell me if i'm wrong, that the JMSClient class send a message on tcp
port
Hi everybody,
I have only one question to make.
There's someone who can explain to me what are, if there are, the
differences between PXE and BPE bpel Engines.
Thanks
Davide
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/BPEL-tf2514159.html#a7011746
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev
PXE and BPE are two different bpel engines.
They have both merged into the Apache Ode project
which now provides its own JBI component.
See http://incubator.apache.org/ode/
On 10/26/06, davipo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have only one question to make.
There's someone who can
: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=431301view=rev
Log:
SM-526: Fault messages returned to BPEL via servicemix-bpe are not accessible
in BPEL
Modified:
incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-bpe/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/bpe/external/JbiInvokeAction.java
Fault messages returned to BPEL
Tests are failing for the BPEL component!! (mvn test)
---
Test set: org.apache.servicemix.bpe.BPEComponentTest
---
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-526?page=comments#action_36762 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-526:
Is this patch ok to apply ? Your last comment seens to indicate it was not
ready ...
Fault messages returned to BPEL via
the NormalizedMessage. The
use of XMLInteractionObject is deprecated within ODE and due to some not
entirely understood code paths this results in Fault messages being wrapped
in a CannedFormattableValue which renders the object immutable in BPEL and its
data unretrieveable to the JBI world when sent back
easier to apply as you only need
to apply one patch file.
Fault messages returned to BPEL via servicemix-bpe are not accessible in BPEL
-
Key: SM-526
URL: https://issues.apache.org
returned to BPEL via servicemix-bpe are not accessible in BPEL
-
Key: SM-526
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-526
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
. I guess the command should have
just been issued from the ServiceMix root directory :) I'll do that next time
instead.
Fault messages returned to BPEL via servicemix-bpe are not accessible in BPEL
Fault messages returned to BPEL via servicemix-bpe are not accessible in BPEL
-
Key: SM-526
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-526
Project: ServiceMix
Hi.
I would be glad to get a short example of how to execute a simple bpel-bpe
flow directly from Spring (without using servicmix.bat).
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/executing-BPEL-bpe-from-Spring-tf1895485.html#a5183888
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum
Thanks!
I've checked that.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/src-for-BPEL-Example-t1791958.html#a4934663
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
On 6/15/06, manuella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in BPEL-Example. And I want to read the source of it.
Does anyone know, where I can find it?
Thanks!
Manuella,
The source for the Loan Broker BPEL example is available in the
ServiceMix source code. Information on checking out
On 6/15/06, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/15/06, manuella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in BPEL-Example. And I want to read the source of it.
Does anyone know, where I can find it?
Thanks!
Manuella,
My apologies, please disregard what I said in my previous message
I'm interested in BPEL-Example. And I want to read the source of it.
Does anyone know, where I can find it?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/src-for-BPEL-Example-t1791958.html#a4882119
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
I have tried to run the BPEL Example on servicemix-2.0.2.
This example doesn't work...
This is the error message:
D:\Program
Files\servicemix-2.0.2\assembly\target\servicemix-2.0.2\bin\servicemi
x-2.0.2\examples\bpelservicemix servicemix.xml
ServiceMix ESB: 2.0.2
Loading ServiceMix from file
PXE integration is broken.
You may want to look at servicemix-bpe in the meantime (available in
3.0 distributions)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 5/4/06, emicalc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried to run the BPEL Example on servicemix-2.0.2.
This example doesn't work...
This is the error
On 15 Feb 2006, at 16:31, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +, James Strachan wrote:
Dims Sanjiva
Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
join us in the ODE proposal
Dims Sanjiva
Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, WS involved
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +, James Strachan wrote:
Dims Sanjiva
Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
community
to other Open source BPEL engines to
join us with their contributions? (ala, Synapse).
- Can we please add people in a phased manner as committers? based on
their patches/energy on the list? (ala, Harmony)
Thanks,
dims
On 2/15/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dims Sanjiva
Given your
On 15 Feb 2006, at 16:31, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +, James Strachan wrote:
Dims Sanjiva
Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
join us in the ODE proposal
but the new proposal changes things
slightly (being a new podling) so to clear things up I've called
another vote.
- Can we please put out a call to other Open source BPEL engines to
join us with their contributions? (ala, Synapse).
Sure, we're open to other contributions and contributors from
On Feb 15, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sanjiva,
- Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about
this
project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this
poddling?
Agreed. That is what I said to the Geronimo PMC, as well. The
Incubator
PMC
here in the Incubator believe it is best to
establish a community with no prior ties, and have repeated that on a
number of occasions (including Sanjiva's and Noel's comments today).
The general belief is that this will create a better community around
the ASF's BPEL work.
Part of the problem
a better community around
the ASF's BPEL work.
Greg, I'm trying to understand the statements above. The more I read
them the more it seems that the Incubator PMC can decide what's best
for a proposal at any given time including making decisions about the
oversight. Are there documents about
Sanjiva,
- Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about this
project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this poddling?
Agreed. That is what I said to the Geronimo PMC, as well. The Incubator
PMC will sponsor the project.
--- Noel
On 14 Feb 2006, at 01:25, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every
JBI implementation that I am aware of has and integrated
orchestration
engine exposed via the BPEL specification.
If every JBI implementation has
after also considering the following:
1. The full expanded name of BPEL is 'Business Process
Execution Language for Web Services;'
2. We have a TLP devoted to Web Services; and
3. A BPEL engine would be a component useful to
a broader range of projects that just Geronimo.
It just doesn't
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every JBI
implementation that I am aware of has and integrated orchestration
engine exposed via the BPEL specification. I am not worried about
barriers to any committers, accidental too-tight binding or
UNrelated mail on mailing
I agree with Dain; let's get the code running in ServiceMix, and then
we can break it off when it's ready to stand alone.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 2/13/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every JBI
implementation that I am aware
After a quick chat with Dims, I think I need to make a quick
correction to this email
On Feb 13, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every
JBI implementation that I am aware of has and integrated
orchestration engine
can bias against newcomers. That isn't
right for the ASF, and it *absolutely* is not write for podling
communities within the Incubator.
This doesn't apply to just BPEL. I had the same reaction to the recent
Ajax proposals. oh, sure, Dojo can come and join this new community.
Right. They'll feel
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every
JBI implementation that I am aware of has and integrated orchestration
engine exposed via the BPEL specification.
If every JBI implementation has an integrated orchestration engine, then we
should factor
After being nervous for quite a while I have come to think that the
sybase bpel engine should go in as part of servicemix and if further
uses outside servicemix develop we can see about splitting it off.
more comments inline.
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Dain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every JBI
implementation that I am aware of has and integrated orchestration
engine exposed via the BPEL specification. I am not worried about
barriers to any
I'd like to retract this email. I have doubts on both sides of this
and may try to explain them in a clearer way in another message.
My apologies
david jencks
On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:26 PM, David Jencks wrote:
After being nervous for quite a while I have come to think that the
sybase bpel
On 2/13/2006 6:43 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Sybase wants to donate to the service-mix community
In other words, they *don't* want to contribute it to Apache.
They want it to go into a specific and particular niche *at*
Apache. Why the
62 matches
Mail list logo
