CXF 2.0.7 for G 2.1.2? - [Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Using WS-Security with Geronimo 2.1.1]

2008-07-08 Thread Joe Bohn
Should we be considering CXF 2.0.7 for Geronimo 2.1.2? Does anybody know of specific reasons to move to 2.0.7 or hold at 2.0.6? Joe Reference this portion of post by Dan Kulp on the user list: Original Message Subject: Re: Re: Re: Using WS-Security with Geronimo 2.1.1 Date: T

Re: CXF 2.0.7 for G 2.1.2? - [Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Using WS-Security with Geronimo 2.1.1]

2008-07-14 Thread Joe Bohn
FWIW, I did a quick check with CXF 2.0.7 and hit some issues with the TCK tests under Geronimo. There must be some Geronimo changes necessary for this upgrade. We'll hold-off upgrading to 2.0.7 for 2.1.2 unless someone has a chance to look into the tck issues before out branch. Joe Joe Boh

Re: CXF 2.0.7 for G 2.1.2? - [Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Using WS-Security with Geronimo 2.1.1]

2008-07-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
Was 2.0.6 OK or did it have the same TCK issues? Dan On Jul 14, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: FWIW, I did a quick check with CXF 2.0.7 and hit some issues with the TCK tests under Geronimo. There must be some Geronimo changes necessary for this upgrade. We'll hold-off upgrading to 2

Re: CXF 2.0.7 for G 2.1.2? - [Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Using WS-Security with Geronimo 2.1.1]

2008-07-14 Thread Joe Bohn
2.0.6 is fine ... I only noticed the problems with 2.0.7. Something must have changed that requires comparable Geronimo changes. Joe Daniel Kulp wrote: Was 2.0.6 OK or did it have the same TCK issues? Dan On Jul 14, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: FWIW, I did a quick check with CXF